MIT master’s student Sunshine Jiang ’25 and Rupert Li ’24 are recipients of this year’s Knight-Hennessy Scholarship. Now in its ninth year, the highly competitive scholarship provides up to three years of financial support for graduate studies at Stanford University. 

Sunshine Jiang  ’25

Sunshine Jiang, from Hangzhou, China, graduated from MIT in 2025 with a bachelor’s degree as a double major in physics and electrical engineering and computer science, along with minors in mathematics and economics. She will receive her master of engineering degree this month and will start her PhD in computer science at Stanford School of Engineering this fall. 

Jiang researches embodied artificial intelligence and robotics, developing data-efficient, adaptive systems for general-purpose robots that broaden accessibility. She has presented her research at major conferences, including the Conference on Robot Learning, the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, and the International Conference on Learning Representations. 

Jiang led the development of AI-powered systems that provide access to traditional Chinese art in rural classrooms, founded cross-country programs that expand girls’ access to STEM education, and created a Covid-19 documentary amplifying community voices, which was featured on China Daily.

Rupert Li ’24

Rupert Li, from Portland, Oregon, is currently pursuing a PhD in mathematics at Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences. He graduated from MIT in 2024 with a bachelor’s degree, double majoring in mathematics and computer science, economics, and data science. Along with his bachelor’s degree, he also received a master’s degree in data science. Li then traveled to the United Kingdom as a Marshall Scholar, where he earned a master’s degree in mathematics from the University of Cambridge.

Li’s research interests lie in probability, discrete geometry, and combinatorics. He enjoys serving as a mentor for MIT PRIMES-USA, a high school math research program, and previously served as an advisor for the Duluth REU, an undergraduate math research program. In addition to the Knight-Hennessy Scholarship and the Marshall Scholarship, he has been awarded the Hertz Fellowship, P.D. Soros Fellowship, and the Goldwater Scholarship, and he received honorable mention for the Frank and Brennie Morgan Prize.

MIT class 2.72/2.270 (Elements of Mechanical Design) offers undergraduate and graduate students advanced study of modeling, design, and integration, along with best practices for use of machine elements like bearings, bolts, belts, flexures, and gears.

“[Students] learn how to use basically everything from the MechE undergraduate curriculum to build hardcore advanced machines,” says Martin Culpepper, the Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor in Manufacturing and professor of mechanical engineering (MechE) at MIT.

The course employs modeling and analysis exercises based on rigorous application of physics, mathematics, and core mechanical engineering principles, which are then reinforced through lab experiences and a mechanical system design project.

Culpepper, known to students and colleagues as Marty, says one of his main goals in the course is to “make students into stronger engineers.” His methods involve a mix of teaching and coaching techniques that push students to explore the bounds of what’s possible. 

“Marty likes to say that ‘as long as something doesn't break the laws of physics, it’s possible. You just have to figure out how to engineer it,’” says Yasin Hamed, a teaching assistant for the course.

For the system design projects, students build a lathe that can meet repeatability, accuracy, and functional requirements, and that can also “pass ‘Marty’s death test,’” says MechE graduate student Sarah Stoops. “What that means practically,” explains fellow graduate student Amber Velez, “is, at the end of class, Marty takes all our lathes and drops them and hits them with a hammer, and if they explode, you don’t pass the class.”

This final test may seem harsh, but it is an important part of the process and helps build to additional, critical skills: resilience and perseverance.

“The students are very resilient. They learn to persevere and take some time to try and figure things out, and through that process … you learn so much,” says Hannah Gazdus, a teaching assistant for the course.

Before the so-called “death test,” students tackle two other challenges: precision and material removal. “All of our lathes are required to cut to within 50 microns of precision,” explains Velez. In the material removal rate competition, teams compete to see who can turn down a piece of stock by one inch the fastest. Velez’s team completed the later task in approximately 27 seconds.

“The core classes are important — things like mechanics, materials, dynamics, controls — but many of them have a degree of abstraction that separates the content within those courses from the mechanical elements that you use in designing an actual machine,” says Hamed. “I feel like this class serves very well to bridge that [and] inspire that confidence as working engineers.”

When Akorfa Dagadu arrived at MIT, she had a solution in mind: a mobile app to improve recycling and environmental engagement in her home country of Ghana. The project, called Ishara, aimed to make it easier for people to participate in local recycling systems while creating economic opportunities.

“I grew up in what people often call the trash capital of Accra,” she recalls. “I thought I knew what would fix it. So [my Ishara co-founders and I] built a solution — an app — behind some desk in a library … We did what I thought was market research, but looking back, we were basically asking people what they thought about our idea instead of asking how things actually worked … Implementation humbled us very quickly.”

On the ground, Dagadu encountered a reality very different than she anticipated.

“Informal networks of waste pickers and aggregators were already doing the work,” she explains. They’d developed a system that was already working, but it was “invisible, undervalued, and excluded from larger recycling conversations.” 

From technical solutions to systems change 

Soon after arriving at MIT, Dagadu discovered the PKG Center for Social Impact as a place that could help her pivot, taking a step back from her technical solution to understand the systemic context of the problem she was trying to solve.

As a first-year student, Dagadu received a PKG Fellowship, which provides funding and mentorship for students to pursue community-engaged research and development. This early support positioned Dagadu to apply to PKG’s IDEAS Social Innovation Incubator to further refine her social enterprise, Ishara. Dagadu was one of few first-year students selected for IDEAS among an applicant pool dominated by MBA and other graduate students. 

“At MIT, there are a lot of opportunities focused on entrepreneurship. But not as many that emphasize how you can do something for the environment or your community,” says Dagadu. IDEAS trains technical founders in systems change for social impact and community-engaged innovation.

Dagadu obtained another PKG Fellowship to iterate on Ishara the following summer, and was accepted to the IDEAS incubator a second time. Eventually, she refined her app from a technical solution the community didn’t need to one that connects existing recycling networks to the broader value chain, in ways that are transparent and fair, using a blockchain-enabled buyback center. 

“The biggest thing PKG has given me is a way of thinking,” Dagadu explains. “The systems thinking mindset really stays with you. You start to see everything as connected. Technical solutions are not just technical; they have social and economic implications. I find myself applying that in all my classes. Whether I am designing a reactor system or working through a materials problem, I am always asking how this fits into the larger system and who it affects.” 

Community-engaged chemical engineering

Dagadu says that “PKG has shaped both how I do research and how I think about it.” She grew to understand the importance of research grounded in local partnerships, and points to her collaboration with Chanja Datti, a recycling company in Nigeria, as a prime example. 

“That collaboration has directly informed my research,” says Dagadu. “What started as a PKG-supported exploration has now grown into a full undergraduate-led research project at MIT, supported by D-Lab, focused on one of the hardest questions in recycling: what to do with multilayer plastic waste.”

“This is where my chemical engineering and materials background comes in,” explains Dagadu, who studies how random heteropolymers can stabilize enzymes for plastic degradation through the Alexander-Katz Lab. “Thinking about polymer structure, processing, and what is actually feasible,” is critical to her work on the ground. “But it is also shaped by everything PKG emphasizes. You cannot separate the material from the system it lives in.”

Dagadu also appreciates the personal community she’s developed through her journey at MIT, especially as her venture evolved and her co-founders stepped away. “I went from being part of a strong team of three to building Ishara largely on my own,” she recalls. “That’s when I understood what people mean by entrepreneurship being lonely. The doubt, the weight of decisions — it became very real, very quickly.”

She drew on relationships developed through PKG and the Kuo Sharper Center for Prosperity and Entrepreneurship, where Dagadu is a student fellow, to ground her and remind her of her personal mission. “It’s not just about having a team,” she realized. “It’s about having a community that can hold you through the moments when things fall apart.” 

The PKG Center’s assistant dean, Alison Hynd, who supported Dagadu through multiple PKG Fellowships, sees Dagadu’s ability to create community as a tremendous asset: “As a first-year student, she came through the door with an intellectual vision and drive to do this work, but at MIT, she’s found her voice to pull other people into it.”

Same question, different scale

Next year, Dagadu will broaden her community still more, as a Schwarzman Scholar at Tsinghua University in Beijing. While the context of her studies will change, her motivation remains the same as when she entered MIT.

“I want to keep asking the same question that’s shaped so much of my work so far,” she says, “not just how we design better materials, but how we design systems where those materials can actually work. That means zooming out and exploring the policy and economics of material flow.” 

Through Ishara, Dagadu’s social enterprise, she’s seen how systems intersect and function on the ground in the case of recycling in Ghana. “Now, I want to understand forces at a much larger scale,” she says, “and I can’t think of a better place to explore this question than in China, the manufacturing hub of the world.”

This is a current list of where and when I am scheduled to speak:

• I’m giving a virtual talk on “The Security of Trust in the Age of AI,” hosted by the Financial Women’s Association of New York, at 6:00 PM ET on May 21, 2026.
• I’m speaking at the Potsdam Conference on National Cybersecurity at the Hasso Plattner Institut in Potsdam, Germany. The event runs June 24–25, 2026, and my talk will be the evening of June 24.
• I’m speaking at the Digital Humanism Conference in Vienna, Austria, on Tuesday, June 26, 2026.
• I’m speaking at the ...

This week, MIT launches a new initiative — titled Science Is Curiosity on a Mission — to make the case for the long-horizon, curiosity-driven science that has powered generations of American innovation. Through stories of scientists pursuing open-ended questions, the project highlights how fundamental discovery research sparks advances in medicine, technology, national security, and economic growth.

MIT News spoke with Alfred Ironside, the Institute’s vice president for communications, about what inspired the effort, what’s at stake for the U.S. research enterprise, and why curiosity remains one of America’s greatest strengths.

Q: What is “Science Is Curiosity on a Mission,” and why launch it now?

A: Science has been under threat for some time now, and public investment in discovery science has been flagging. We want to remind people in Washington and across the country what curiosity-driven science is all about, and why it matters so much in our individual lives and in the life of the country. 

Science begins with curiosity — someone asking a question and refusing to let it go. History’s most important discoveries did not begin with a commercial objective or a guaranteed outcome. They began because someone wanted to understand how the world works. Think Ben Franklin and his kite: This drive to discover goes back to the beginnings of the United States. 

That’s the story we want to tell, but in today’s terms. We’re spotlighting researchers whose years-long pursuit of core questions has seeded breakthroughs that have changed lives for the better.

We’re launching this storytelling initiative now because public investment is declining, and in all the debates about funding what’s gotten lost is an appreciation for the incredible gifts of curiosity-driven discovery science. 

Over generations, the United States became the world’s scientific leader by investing in research of this kind, especially at universities, where long-term scientific undertakings have time and space to thrive. In turn, those investments have created an extraordinary pipeline of innovation, the envy of the world.

When public investment in basic science falters, the long-term losses start right away — and cascade. Labs close. Young scientists leave the field. Entire avenues of discovery go unexplored. Those losses are not always immediately visible, but eventually we feel them through what’s missing: treatments that never arrive, industries that never emerge, talent that migrates elsewhere.

Other countries understand this. They’re watching us stumble — and they’re growing their research investments aggressively. America’s scientific leadership has been built over decades — and maintaining it requires similar commitment.

It’s important to note that while this initiative to tell the story of discovery science was sparked at MIT, it is not about MIT. We want to spotlight university-based scientists across the country whose work is critical in advancing discovery, educating talent, and fueling innovation that benefits all of us.

Q: Why emphasize the idea of “curiosity”?

A: We start with curiosity for two reasons. First, it’s a human experience we’ve all had, so everyone can relate to it. Everyone knows the feeling of just wanting to know why something happens or how something works. Second, it’s the essential fuel that drives discovery science. 

There’s sometimes a tendency to talk about science in terms of outputs: breakthroughs, startups, commercial applications. Those things matter enormously, but they usually come much later. The beginning is more human. It’s someone wondering why something behaves the way it does, or whether a seemingly impossible problem might have an answer.

Some of the most transformative breakthroughs arose from questions that once appeared disconnected from practical use. MRI technology grew from research on atomic nuclei. The foundations of immunotherapy came from scientists trying to understand how the immune system works. GPS depends on what was once viewed as purely theoretical physics.

Curiosity fuels scientific discovery by pushing people to keep pursuing deep questions because they simply need to know: How does the brain work? How does cancer start? What is the universe made of?

That’s why the second half of the phrase matters: “on a mission.” University researchers are not indulging in idle speculation. They are pursuing knowledge to expand our understanding — and that new knowledge can be the key to startling new solutions.

Universities are uniquely important environments for this work. They bring together people from different disciplines and backgrounds who challenge assumptions and generate new questions. That concentration of talent and openness is extraordinarily productive.

After World War II, the American research university system became one of the most successful engines of discovery in human history. Public investment in university research has helped produce new medicines, computing technologies, communications networks, energy systems, and entire industries that shape modern life.

This effort aims to reconnect all of us with that story.

Q: What’s at stake if the U.S. fails to sustain support for basic research?

A: What’s at stake is not just scientific leadership, but the future pace of American innovation and opportunity.

The innovation pipeline operates across long time horizons. The discoveries powering today’s companies and medical treatments often crystallized 10, 20, or 30 years ago. The breakthroughs that will define the 2040s and 2050s are being explored in laboratories right now.

Basic research is the foundation of that pipeline, and private-sector innovation depends on it. Private investment plays a critical role, but it naturally gravitates toward projects with clearer commercial returns. Public funding supports the earliest, highest-risk stages of inquiry, where outcomes are uncertain but the potential benefit to society is enormous.

If that pipeline dries up, the consequences are stark. Fewer discoveries lead to fewer technologies, startups, and industries. We also risk losing scientific talent to countries that are watching our shifting national priorities — and making larger and more sustained investments in advancing science.

At the same time, there is enormous reason for optimism. The American scientific enterprise remains one of the great achievements of the modern era. It has delivered extraordinary gains in health, prosperity, and quality of life. Millions of people are alive today because of advances rooted in publicly supported research.

This system was built through sustained national commitment across generations. The question now is whether the country will continue investing in curiosity, discovery, and the people pursuing the new knowledge that will allow us to solve the intractable problems of tomorrow.

When curiosity is given room to run, the results can be life-changing for us all.

Last month, Anthropic made a remarkable announcement about its new model, Claude Mythos Preview: it was so good at finding security vulnerabilities in software that the company would not release it to the general public. Instead, it would only be available to a select group of companies to scan and fix their own software.

The announcement requires context—but it contained an essential truth.

While Anthropic’s model is really good at finding software vulnerabilities, so are other models. The UK’s AI Security Institute found that OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, already generally available, is comparable in capability. The company Aisle ...

The conservative justice, who owns significant sums of oil and gas stock, has not recused himself from a major climate change case that could benefit the fossil fuel industry.

FEMA will no longer challenge court decisions that had invalidated its effort to force states to comply with immigration enforcement.

The Iran war is driving countries toward Chinese EVs, solar and batteries — strengthening China's hand as Trump seeks trade wins in Beijing.

A $100 million program approved by state lawmakers Wednesday will help thousands protect against roof damage from hail and wind.

The pushback from the Senate's top EPA appropriator follows similar skepticism of massive budget cuts from her House Republican counterparts.

The investments show growing confidence in a renewable energy that has roots in oil and gas fields.

The analysis determined that a quarter of games will likely be risky.

Intense, concentrated rainstorms have been on the rise for decades. And those bigger storms turn out to have a counterintuitive effect.

King Charles III has announced the government’s agenda for the next parliament.

The energy crisis is incentivizing ambitious solar power decisions across Southeast Asia.

Among the deals, Kenya Airways and Rubis Energy agreed to jointly develop Africa's first sustainable aviation fuel production facility in Kenya.

Since joining the faculty of MIT’s Department of Political Science in 2012, F. Daniel Hidalgo, known to many as “Danny,” has built a reputation as both a meticulous quantitative scholar and one of the department’s most generous and steadfast mentors.

A member of the 2025–27 Committed to Caring cohort, Hidalgo is recognized for a style of mentorship that combines intellectual intensity with humility, approachability, and a willingness to show up for students. A quantitative political scientist whose research focuses on elections, democratic accountability, and political behavior in Brazil and Latin America, his scholarship uses statistical and experimental methods to study how institutions shape political outcomes. According to his students, the rigor he brings to his research is matched by an equally strong commitment to the people he mentors.

Hidalgo’s reputation is illuminated repeatedly in nominations. One student, reflecting on years of mentorship, aptly summed this up by saying, “I have yet to meet a professor that cares more for their students.”

Showing the mess, not just the map

Most MIT political science PhD students encounter Hidalgo in their first year, when he teaches the department’s quantitative methods sequence. For many, the course is a turning point — an introduction to causal inference and the logic of experimentation that reshapes how they think about political science itself.

While the material is demanding, students describe a classroom that feels captivating, rather than intimidating. Even during the height of Covid-19-era Zoom courses, one student reflected on the ways in which Hidalgo “made the class engaging and interesting,” injecting energy into even the most complex statistical concepts. “It is no surprise that for many of us, the final papers we wrote for this class laid the foundation … for our subsequent research trajectories,” the student added.

Hidalgo’s approach to mentorship begins with demystifying research by exposing the process behind final products. If he had to articulate a guiding principle, he says, it would be this: “Show students the mess, not just the map.” Graduate students too often see only the polished journal article, not the abandoned drafts, failed models, or questions that had to be rebuilt from scratch. Hidalgo makes a point of bringing students into that disorganization early, normalizing uncertainty as part of scholarship.

That transparency reshapes both how students conceive of research, and how they intentionally practice it. As one student explained, Hidalgo’s mentorship creates “a space where we can share even our messiest ideas,” knowing they will be met with thoughtful feedback rather than judgment. His classroom and office are often described as rare environments where rigor and creativity coexist without fear.

A boundless capacity for mentorship

It is no secret within the department that Hidalgo advises a large number of students, providing one-on-one mentorship in addition to leading a growing research group. Despite this, students consistently describe weekly meetings where he gives their work his full attention. He reads drafts carefully and responds with detailed, constructive feedback, whether on a fellowship application, a conference paper, or a dissertation chapter.

Hidalgo’s mentorship is not confined to his formal advisees. Students who are not on his committee can still rely on him for advice on quantitative methods, knowing that he will make time for them. Over time, this has earned him a department-wide reputation as approachable, steady, and kind.

His advisees’ research spans the discipline: business politics in China, applied machine learning, nationalism in Europe, and electoral politics in Latin America. As one student put it, mentees are “united not by a single topic, but by [Hidalgo’s] generous and inclusive mentorship.” Although his own scholarship centers on Brazil and Latin America, students say he tackles every project with genuine curiosity and intellectual investment, connecting them to literature they might never have encountered and sharpening their arguments’ credibility.

At an institution where quantitative research is often the default, Hidalgo encourages methodological grounding that goes beyond the dataset. He pushes students to immerse themselves in the contexts they study: spend time in the field, talk to people, and absorb local political realities. Immersion, he argues, does not replace rigorous analysis — it sharpens it.

Building community in a solitary profession

Dissertation work can be isolating. In response, Hidalgo has launched a biweekly research group for his mentees. The group, now more than 10 students strong, meets throughout the semester to workshop ideas at any stage of development.

Students describe it as a rare low-stakes space where early drafts are welcome and half-formed ideas encouraged. Discussions are intellectually demanding, but never hostile. The diversity of projects — across regions, methods, and topics — broadens everyone’s perspective.

Hidalgo’s care for his students also emerges in small but meaningful ways. He brings snacks to meetings, organizes informal gatherings, and creates opportunities for connection beyond formal advising. During the isolation of the Covid-19 pandemic, he engaged students through reading groups and small gatherings. When visiting scholars arrive, he folds them in. When global or personal events weigh heavily, he checks in.

One student recalled the morning after a deeply contentious U.S. presidential election. Rather than proceed as usual, Hidalgo canceled class and invited students to gather in his office. There were pastries and a space to talk — “a small, deeply touching gesture” that made an anxious day more bearable.

Standing by students in moments of uncertainty

Several nominations speak not only to academic mentorship, but to Hidalgo’s response during moments of personal and professional difficulty.

One advisee described hitting a breaking point in their fourth year: stalled research ideas, a failed fieldwork trip, deteriorating mental health, and a departmental warning about insufficient progress. Rather than stepping back, Hidalgo leaned in — helping generate new project ideas, structuring attainable plans, and encouraging another attempt at fieldwork, which ultimately proved successful.

Another student, pursuing an unconventional joint program bridging political science and statistics, described feeling academically isolated. Recognizing that need, Hidalgo helped create a reading group aligned with the student’s interests and encouraged collaboration across departments. As the student recalled, he “[put] the maximum trust in me to make decisions while always giving me the strong feeling that he [had] my back.”

When students choose paths outside academia, Hidalgo is equally supportive — encouraging them to align their research and professional development with their goals, without diminishing the value of their work.

His mentorship leaves a lasting imprint not only on students’ research, but on how they understand what it means to support others in turn. Across these experiences, a consistent theme emerges: Hidalgo challenges students to meet high standards while ensuring they never navigate those expectations alone. 

Elazer R. Edelman ’78, SM ’79, PhD ’84, an engineer and cardiologist who helped develop cardiovascular stents that have been used by more than 100 million people, has been named the recipient of the 2026-2027 James R. Killian Jr. Faculty Achievement Award.

The award committee recognized Edelman, the Edward J. Poitras Professor in Medical Engineering at MIT’s Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, for his work at the interface of engineering, science, and medicine. In addition to his work on stents, he has made significant contributions to tissue engineering and to deciphering the fundamental biological processes underling cardiovascular disease.

A member of the MIT faculty for more than 30 years, Edelman is renowned as a teacher and mentor. He is also a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a critical care cardiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and he served as director of MIT’s Institute for Medical Engineering and Science from 2018 to 2024.

“He is a clinician of the highest order who has touched the lives of many, a teacher of greatest passion who has mentored hundreds and taught thousands, and an engineer whose work has reached around the globe,” states the award citation, which was presented at today’s faculty meeting by Xuanhe Zhao, chair of the Killian Award Selection Committee and a professor of mechanical engineering at MIT.

The Killian Award was established in 1971 to recognize outstanding professional contributions by MIT faculty members. It is the highest honor that the faculty can give to one of its members.

“It’s deeply meaningful that your colleagues think enough of you to want to recognize your life’s work. This is an incredibly awe-inspiring group, and for them to feel that way is a truly special honor,” Edelman told MIT News after learning that he had been selected for the award.

Edelman, who grew up in Brookline, Massachusetts, got his first MIT experience as a high school student, taking classes as part of the Institute’s High School Studies Program. That experience led him to apply to MIT, where he earned two bachelor’s degrees, in applied biology and electrical engineering and computer science, followed by a master’s in bioelectrical engineering and a PhD in medical engineering and medical physics. He also earned an MD from Harvard Medical School through the Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology.

As a graduate student, Edelman was one of the first students to join the lab of Robert Langer, the David H. Koch Institute Professor at MIT. Working with Langer, he developed mathematical approaches to guide the design of controlled drug-delivery systems.

“Bob opened my eyes to what it really means to use MIT science to make the world a better place,” Edelman says.

Early in his career, Edelman brought a scientist’s eye to one of medicine’s most urgent clinical challenges: how to address diseased blood vessels without provoking further injury. His studies of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of atherosclerosis and vascular healing — work that continues to this day — coupled with fundamental insights from engineering and physics, helped enable the optimization of bare-metal stents and the development of drug-eluting stents. 

Roughly 90 percent of the more than 100 million stents implanted worldwide now release drugs through principles his work helped define and advance, saving countless lives and improving quality of life for patients around the globe.

Edelman’s work reflects a continuing cycle of discovery: Basic insights in biology shaped transformative medical technologies, and the challenges posed by those technologies, in turn, continue to push biology, science, technology, and engineering together toward new discoveries and clinical advances.

“His landmark work on the cellular mechanisms underlying atherosclerosis and on the biology of cell-material interfaces established the scientific foundations that transformed bare-metal cardiovascular stents from a promising mechanical concept into a biologically informed and clinically transformative therapy with enduring legacy — paving the way for a cascade of innovations that changed the landscape of medicine,” the award committee wrote.

More recently, Edelman’s lab has designed novel heart valves and other innovative approaches to mechanical organ support.

During his tenure as the director of IMES, he led an MIT-wide effort to provide personal protective equipment to health care workers and emergency responders in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

“One of the things I’m most proud of is working with many people at MIT in the Covid response. At the height of Covid, we were supplying 23 percent of all PPE throughout New England,” he says. “Every single person who could possibly contribute contributed.”

As director of MIT’s Center for Clinical Translational Research and faculty lead for the Hood Pediatric Innovation Hub, he is now working to help clinical research thrive at MIT and to address the inequities in technology access for society’s most vulnerable population — children.

Throughout his career, Edelman has devoted himself to mentoring students and trainees.

“I’m really proud of what our students have accomplished, not only scientifically, but on a personal level, and not only with me, but everything they’ve done afterwards. The greatness of a place like MIT is that you enable people to grow beyond their potential. That’s really the extraordinary thing about our community,” he says.

In recognition of his scientific achievements, Edelman has been elected a fellow of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the Association of University Cardiologists, the American Society of Clinical Investigation, American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, National Academy of Inventors, the Institute of Medicine/National Academy of Medicine, and the National Academy of Engineering.

“The Selection Committee is delighted to have this opportunity to honor Professor Elazer Edelman for his exceptional contributions to medical engineering and science, to MIT, and to the world,” the award citation concludes.

Oxygen is a cornerstone of chemistry, largely because it is so good at building the organic molecules that make up our world. Some oxygen-based compounds, called peroxides, are famous for being highly reactive — they act like oxygen delivery trucks, transferring atoms to other molecules. This process is essential for everything from creating new medicines to industrial manufacturing.

In an open-access study published April 24 in Nature Chemistry, researchers from the labs of MIT professors Christopher C. Cummins and Robert J. Gilliard, Jr. have revealed a brand-new type of peroxide containing boron. This molecule, called a dioxaborirane, represents a major advance in a field where such structures were long-proposed, but considered too unstable to actually isolate.

Room-temperature breakthrough

Dioxaborirane forms when a specially engineered boron molecule reacts with oxygen gas. What makes this discovery remarkable is that the reaction happens almost instantly at room temperature. Usually, creating strained oxygen-containing rings like this requires extreme, “punishing” conditions — like freezing temperatures or high pressure — to keep the molecule from falling apart.

Using advanced tools such as crystallography and computational modeling, the team proved the existence of a highly strained, three-member ring made of one boron and two oxygen atoms.

A molecule with two personalities

The most exciting part of the discovery is how the molecule behaves. Depending on its electrical charge, it acts in two very different ways:

• The builder: It can donate oxygen atoms to help construct new chemical compounds.
• The trapper: It can react with carbon dioxide, potentially offering a new way to capture and transform greenhouse gases.

“By showing that these compounds can be generated under mild conditions, our work opens the door to entirely new types of chemistry,” says Chonghe Zhang, the first author of the paper and an MIT chemistry graduate student co-advised by Cummins and Gilliard. “In the long term, these findings could provide us with powerful new tools for oxidation reactions in synthesis and materials science.”

Additional co-authors on the paper are Noah D. McMillion and Chun-Lin Deng of MIT and Junyi Wang of Baylor University. The work was funded, in part, by the U.S. National Science Foundation.