Transistors, the building blocks of modern electronics, are typically made of silicon. Because it’s a semiconductor, this material can control the flow of electricity in a circuit. But silicon has fundamental physical limits that restrict how compact and energy-efficient a transistor can be.

MIT researchers have now replaced silicon with a magnetic semiconductor, creating a magnetic transistor that could enable smaller, faster, and more energy-efficient circuits. The material’s magnetism strongly influences its electronic behavior, leading to more efficient control of the flow of electricity. 

The team used a novel magnetic material and an optimization process that reduces the material’s defects, which boosts the transistor’s performance.

The material’s unique magnetic properties also allow for transistors with built-in memory, which would simplify circuit design and unlock new applications for high-performance electronics.

“People have known about magnets for thousands of years, but there are very limited ways to incorporate magnetism into electronics. We have shown a new way to efficiently utilize magnetism that opens up a lot of possibilities for future applications and research,” says Chung-Tao Chou, an MIT graduate student in the departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) and Physics, and co-lead author of a paper on this advance.

Chou is joined on the paper by co-lead author Eugene Park, a graduate student in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE); Julian Klein, a DMSE research scientist; Josep Ingla-Aynes, a postdoc in the MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center; Jagadeesh S. Moodera, a senior research scientist in the Department of Physics; and senior authors Frances Ross, TDK Professor in DMSE; and Luqiao Liu, an associate professor in EECS, and a member of the Research Laboratory of Electronics; as well as others at the University of Chemistry and Technology in Prague. The paper appears today in Physical Review Letters.

Overcoming the limits

In an electronic device, silicon semiconductor transistors act like tiny light switches that turn a circuit on and off, or amplify weak signals in a communication system. They do this using a small input voltage.

But a fundamental physical limit of silicon semiconductors prevents a transistor from operating below a certain voltage, which hinders its energy efficiency.

To make more efficient electronics, researchers have spent decades working toward magnetic transistors that utilize electron spin to control the flow of electricity. Electron spin is a fundamental property that enables electrons to behave like tiny magnets.

So far, scientists have mostly been limited to using certain magnetic materials. These lack the favorable electronic properties of semiconductors, constraining device performance.

“In this work, we combine magnetism and semiconductor physics to realize useful spintronic devices,” Liu says.

The researchers replace the silicon in the surface layer of a transistor with chromium sulfur bromide, a two-dimensional material that acts as a magnetic semiconductor.

Due to the material’s structure, researchers can switch between two magnetic states very cleanly. This makes it ideal for use in a transistor that smoothly switches between “on” and “off.”

“One of the biggest challenges we faced was finding the right material. We tried many other materials that didn’t work,” Chou says.

They discovered that changing these magnetic states modifies the material’s electronic properties, enabling low-energy operation. And unlike many other 2D materials, chromium sulfur bromide remains stable in air.

To make a transistor, the researchers pattern electrodes onto a silicon substrate, then carefully align and transfer the 2D material on top. They use tape to pick up a tiny piece of material, only a few tens of nanometers thick, and place it onto the substrate.

“A lot of researchers will use solvents or glue to do the transfer, but transistors require a very clean surface. We eliminate all those risks by simplifying this step,” Chou says.

Leveraging magnetism

This lack of contamination enables their device to outperform existing magnetic transistors. Most others can only create a weak magnetic effect, changing the flow of current by a few percent or less. Their new transistor can switch or amplify the electric current by a factor of 10.

They use an external magnetic field to change the magnetic state of the material, switching the transistor using significantly less energy than would usually be required.

The material also allows them to control the magnetic states with electric current. This is important because engineers cannot apply magnetic fields to individual transistors in an electronic device. They need to control each one electrically.

The material’s magnetic properties could also enable transistors with built-in memory, simplifying the design of logic or memory circuits.

A typical memory device has a magnetic cell to store information and a transistor to read it out. Their method can combine both into one magnetic transistor.

“Now, not only are transistors turning on and off, they are also remembering information. And because we can switch the transistor with greater magnitude, the signal is much stronger so we can read out the information faster, and in a much more reliable way,” Liu says.

Building on this demonstration, the researchers plan to further study the use of electrical current to control the device. They are also working to make their method scalable so they can fabricate arrays of transistors.

This research was supported, in part, by the Semiconductor Research Corporation, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Army Research Office, and the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports. The work was partially carried out at the MIT.nano facilities.

A "carbon-intelligent computing" tool has come in handy as the tech giant negotiates with utilities to connect data centers to the grid.

Officials from a shuttered climate and health office offer a postmortem about the limits of their work in a Democratic administration in the hopes of continuing their efforts under a future president.

A new analysis shows the state's vital infrastructure such as power plants and police stations is highly exposed to flood damage.

The shift could affect glacier mass and freshwater resources depended on by large numbers of people.

The research has already led to some conclusions that strengthened California's fire code.

The U.S. is the second-largest market for long-lasting energy storage and is expected to ramp up deployments later this decade.

Wind is gathering interest in India due to its ability to meet high demand in the evening and early morning, when solar power is absent.

Citing skyrocketing prices, members of parliament from across the aisle want the institution’s plenary sessions to be held in Brussels.

The Japan Meteorological Agency will use the term “kokushobi,” which means “severely hot day,” to “effectively raise awareness and encourage caution” among the public.

The next time you find yourself lulled by the patter of rain outside your window, think how that same sprinkle might sound if you were a tiny seed planted directly below a free-falling droplet. Would you still be similarly soothed?

In fact, MIT engineers have found the opposite to be the case: Some seeds may come alive to the sound of rain. In experiments with rice seeds, the team found that the sound of falling droplets effectively shook the seeds out of a dormant state, stimulating them to germinate at a faster rate compared with seeds that were not exposed to the same sound vibrations.

The team’s findings, which are published today in the journal Scientific Reports, are the first direct evidence that plant seeds and seedlings can sense sounds in nature. Their experiments involved rice seeds that they submerged in shallow water. Rice can germinate in both soil and shallow water. The researchers suspect that many similar seed types may also respond to the sound of rain.

The team worked out a hypothesis to explain how the seeds might be doing this. They found that when a raindrop hits the surface of a puddle or the ground, it generates a sound wave that makes the surroundings vibrate, including any shallowly submerged seeds. These vibrations can be strong enough to dislodge a seed’s “statoliths,” which are tiny gravity-sensing organelles within certain cells of a seed. When these statoliths are jostled, their movement is a signal for seeds and seedlings to grow and sprout.

“What this study is saying is that seeds can sense sound in ways that can help them survive,” says study author Nicholas Makris, a professor of mechanical engineering at MIT. “The energy of the rain sound is enough to accelerate a seed’s growth.”

Makris and his co-author, Cadine Navarro, a former graduate student in MIT’s Department of Urban Studies and Planning, suspect that the sound of rain is similar to the vibrations generated by other natural phenomena such as wind. They plan to follow up this work to investigate other natural vibrations and sounds plants may perceive.

Sound vibration

Plants are surprisingly perceptive. To help them survive, plants have evolved to sense and respond to stimuli in their surroundings. Some plants snap shut when touched, while others curl inward when exposed to toxic smells. And of course, most plants respond to light, reaching toward the sun to help them grow.

Plants can also sense gravity. A plant’s roots grow down, while its shoots push up against gravity’s pull. One way that plants sense and respond to gravity is through their statoliths. Statoliths are denser than a cell’s cytoplasm and can drift and sink through the cell, like a bit of sand in a jar of water. When a statolith finally settles to the bottom, its resting place on the cell’s membrane is a reflection of gravity’s direction and a signal for where a seed’s root or shoot should grow. If the statolith is dislodged, scientists have found that this can also trigger the seed to grow more.

Makris, whose work focuses on acoustics across a range of disciplines, became curious when Navarro asked him questions about seeds and sound. They wondered: Could sound be enough to jostle the statoliths and stimulate a seed to grow? And if so, what sounds in nature could be strong enough to have such an effect?

“I went back to look at work done by colleagues in the 1980s, who measured the sound of rain underwater. If you check, you’ll see it’s much greater than in the air,” Makris says. “It has to do with the fact that water is denser than air, so the same drop makes larger pressure waves underwater. So if you’re a seed that’s within a few centimeters of a raindrop’s impact, the kind of sound pressures that you would experience in water or in the ground are equivalent to what you’d be subject to within a few meters of a jet engine in the air.”

Such rain-induced soundwaves, Makris and Navarro suspected, might be enough to jostle statoliths and subsequently stimulate a seed’s growth.

Connecting a droplet’s dots

To test this idea, the researchers carried out experiments with rice seeds, which naturally grow in shallow watery fields. Over a large number of repeated experiments, the team submerged roughly 8,000 individual seeds of rice in shallow tubs of water and exposed sections of them to dripping water. The seeds were placed sufficiently far away from the falling droplets that only sound waves would reach them. The team varied the size and height of each water droplet to mimic raindrops during light, moderate, and heavy rainstorms.

The sound of rain, recorded by MIT researchers from underwater, within a rain puddle in Massachusetts during a moderate to heavy rainstorm. 
Credit: Courtesy of the researchers

They also used a hydrophone to measure the acoustic vibrations created underwater by the water droplets. They compared these measurements to recordings they took in the field, such as in puddles, ponds, wetlands, and soils during rainstorms. The comparisons confirmed that their water droplets in the lab were generating rain-induced acoustic vibrations as in nature.

As they observed the rice seeds, the researchers found that the groups of seeds that were exposed to the sound of water were able to germinate 30 to 40 percent faster than the seed groups that were not exposed to rain sounds but were otherwise in identical conditions. They also found that seeds that were closer to the surface could better sense the droplets’ sounds and grow faster, compared to more submerged or more distant seeds.

These experiments showed that there is a connection between the sound of a water droplet and a seed’s ability to grow. The researchers propose that there may be a biological advantage to seeds that can sense rain: If they are close enough to the surface to respond to the sound of rain, they are likely at an optimal depth to soak up moisture and safely grow to the surface.

The team then worked out calculations to see whether the physical vibrations of the droplets would be enough to jostle the seeds’ microscopic statoliths. If so, this would point to the mechanism by which sound can directly stimulate a plant’s growth.

In their calculations, the researchers factored in a rain droplet’s size and terminal velocity (the constant speed that a falling object eventually reaches), and worked out the amplitude of sound vibration the droplet would generate. From this, they determined to what degree these vibrations in water or soil would displace, or shake a submerged or buried seed, and how a shaking seed would affect microscopic statoliths within individual cells.

Makris and Navarro found that the experiments they performed on rice seeds were consistent with their calculations: The sound of rain can indeed dislodge and jostle a seed’s statoliths. This mechanism is likely at the root of a plant’s ability to “sense” the sound of rain and grow in response.

“Brilliant research has been done around the world to reveal the mechanisms behind the ability of plants to sense gravity,” Makris notes. “Our study has shown that these same mechanisms seem to be providing plant seeds a means of perceiving submergence depths in the soil or water that are beneficial to their survival by sensing the sound of rain. It gives new meaning to the fourth Japanese microseason, entitled ‘Falling rain awakens the soil.’”

This work was supported, in part, by the MIT Bose Fellowship and the MIT Koch Chair.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 22 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02615-y

It is important to assess the gap between national climate ambitions and the goal of limiting global temperature increase. This multi-model analysis shows that if net-zero pledges are implemented, meeting the 2 °C target is feasible, while increasing ambition and international cooperation is crucial.

MIT Comparative Media Studies/Writing Professor T.L. Taylor has been named a 2026-27 fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University (CASBS), a highly selective residential program that convenes scholars from a wide range of disciplines for a year of focused research, collaborative exchange, and intellectual engagement.

Professor Taylor — an ethnographer whose work sits at the intersection of sociology; media studies; and science, technology, and society — will be focusing on her current project exploring the rise of “immersion” in physical spaces as a contemporary cultural pursuit. While new entertainment undertakings like The Sphere in Las Vegas, interactive theater like Sleep No More, or Meow Wolf’s growing list of city-based immersive art projects have captured popular attention, Taylor’s project turns to their progenitor, a much older, more widespread instantiation of the immersive experience — the theme park.

Building on fieldwork undertaken over the last several years in Disney parks around the world, as well as interviews with both designers and attendees, she will be working on a new book that examines theme parks as sitting at the analytically rich intersection of design, infrastructure, and play. Extending her influential work on digital environments and online communities, this project bridges from game and virtual world studies to an examination of physical, immersive environments.

As in her prior work, Taylor treats leisure as an area of study worth taking seriously. Not dissimilar to gaming, there is a tendency to underestimate, or simply dismiss, the economic and cultural significance of these environments. In 2025, theme parks worldwide boasted 976 million visitors and the Walt Disney Co.’s “Experiences” division alone reported $10 billion in profit last year. Spaces of play and experiential engagement also regularly embody some of our most pressing contemporary conversations. Theme parks, she notes, are “at the heart of economic and media systems, technological development, and cultural imaginaries despite — like video games before them — often being dismissed as peripheral to ‘serious’ matters.”

The fellowship project frames theme parks as simultaneously operating on several levels: intentionally designed worlds “that invite people to step into them,” socio-technical infrastructures “meant to facilitate affective, embodied experience,” and as “playgrounds” that sometimes afford participation beyond corporate control and governance.

At the center of the work is a tension familiar from digital environments. “You invite people into a designed space,” she says, “but what happens when emergent culture collides with expectations of use?” One of the most interesting examples of this tension she has encountered in her fieldwork, for example, is of fan-organized live-action role-play within a theme park, a moment in which the environment functions as a playground for emergent experience within an otherwise tightly controlled commercial frame.

The CASBS fellowship will offer Taylor the time and intellectual cross-pollination needed to best situate, and even challenge, her new work. The program’s interdisciplinary cohort is drawn from across the social sciences, humanities, law, health, and other fields; it includes 36 scholars from 30 institutions. “It’s an amazing opportunity to work through the data and write in a really vibrant setting where conversation and cross-disciplinary engagement is at the heart of the experience” she says.

When you throw a ball in the air, the equations of classical physics will tell you exactly what path the ball will take as it falls, and when and where it will land. But if you were to squeeze that same ball down to the size of an atom or smaller, it would behave in ways beyond anything that classical physics can predict.

Or so we’ve thought.

MIT scientists have now shown that certain mathematical ideas from everyday classical physics can be used to describe the often weird and nonintuitive behavior that occurs at the quantum, subatomic scale.

In a paper appearing today in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society, the team shows that the motion of a quantum object can be calculated by applying an idea from classical physics known as “least action.” With their new formulation, they show they can arrive at exactly the same solution as the Schrödinger equation — the main description of quantum mechanics — for a number of textbook quantum-mechanical scenarios, including the double-slit experiment and quantum tunneling.

Such mysterious phenomena, that could only be understood through equations of quantum mechanics, can now also be described using the team’s new classical formulation. In essence, the researchers have built an exact mathematical bridge between the classical, everyday physical world and the world that happens at dimensions smaller than an atom.

“Before, there was a very tenuous bridge that worked only for reasonably large [quantum] particles,” says study co-author Winfried Lohmiller, a research associate in the Nonlinear Systems Laboratory at MIT. “Now we have a strong bridge — a common way to describe quantum mechanics, classical mechanics, and relativity, that holds at all scales.”

“We’re not saying there’s anything wrong with quantum mechanics,” emphasizes co-author Jean-Jacques Slotine, an MIT professor of mechanical engineering and information sciences, and of brain and cognitive sciences. “We’re just showing a different way to compute quantum mechanics, which is based on well-known classical ideas that we put together in a simple way.”

To infinity and far below

Slotine and Lohmiller derived the quantum bridge while working on solidly classical problems. The researchers are members of the MIT Nonlinear Systems Laboratory, which Slotine directs. He and his colleagues develop models to describe complex behavior in problems of robotic and aircraft control, neuroscience, and machine learning. To predict the behavior of such systems, engineers often look to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, which is one of the major formulations of classical mechanics and is related to Newton’s famous laws of motion.

The Hamilton-Jacobi equation essentially represents an object’s motion as minimizing a quantity called the action. Take, for instance, a simple scenario in which a ball is thrown from point A to point B. Theoretically, the ball could take any number of zigzagging paths between the two points. But the equation states that the actual path should be one where the ball’s “action” is minimized at every single point along that path.

In this case, the term “action” refers to the sum over time of the difference between an object’s kinetic energy (the energy that is generating the motion) and its potential energy (the object’s stored energy). The actual path that a ball takes between point A and B should then be a sequence of positions where the overall difference between kinetic and potential energy is minimized.

Slotine and Lohmiller were applying the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, and the principle of least action, to a number of classical mechanics problems with constraints when they realized that the equation, with some mathematical extensions, could solve a famous problem in quantum mechanics known as the double-slit experiment.

The double-slit experiment illustrates one of the weird, nonclassical behaviors that arises at quantum scales. In the experiment, two slits are cut out of a metal wall. When a single photon — a quantum-scale particle of light — is shot toward the wall, classical physics predicts that you should see a spot of light on the other side of the wall, assuming that the photon flew straight through either one of the holes, following a single path.

But experimentalists have instead observed alternating bright and dark stripes. The reality-bending pattern is a result of a quantum mechanical phenomenon by which a photon takes more than one path simultaneously. In this context, when a single photon is shot toward the wall, it can pass through both holes at the same time, along two paths that end up interfering with each other. The pattern of stripes that results means that the photon’s two interfering paths must be wave-like. The experiment therefore demonstrates how a quantum particle can also behave, however improbably, like a wave.

Since the discovery of quantum mechanics, physicists have tried to explain the double-slit experiment using tools from classical, everyday physics. But they’ve only ever been able to approximate the experiment’s results.

Even the noted physicist Richard Feynman ’39 found the task impossible. He assumed that one would have to consider and average over every single theoretical path that a photon could take, whether it be a straight line or any variation of a zigzagging path through either of the two holes. Such an exercise would require calculating an infinite number of possible zigzag paths, which all contradict the classical smooth paths one would expect. 

This last point is what Slotine and Lohmiller realized could be tweaked. Where classical physics assumes that an object must only take a single path from point A to B, quantum mechanics allows for an object to take multiple paths and multiple states simultaneously — a fundamental quantum property known as superposition.

The team wondered: What if classical physics could also entertain, at least mathematically, this notion of multiple paths? Then, they reasoned that an infinite number of paths wouldn’t have to be calculated. Instead, a much smaller number of “least action” classical paths might produce the exact same quantum result.

With this idea in mind, they looked back to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation to see how they might adapt its principles of least action to predict the double-slit experiment and other quantum phenomena.

“For a while we thought it was a little too good to be true,” Slotine says.

A particle’s destiny is in its density

In their new study, the team adds another ingredient of classical physics: “density,” which is, essentially, a probability that a given path is taken.

“We think of density in terms of fluid dynamics,” Lohmiller explains. “For the double-slit experiment, imagine pumping a hose toward the wall. What will happen is, most of the water will hit the center, but some droplets will also go toward the sides. A high density of water at the center means there is a high probability of finding a droplet along that path. And there will be a distribution, which we can compute.”

He and Slotine tweaked the Hamilton-Jacobi equation to include terms of density and multiple least action paths, and applied it to the double-slit experiment. They found that with this formulation, they only had to consider two classical paths through the two slits, as compared to Feynman’s infinity of zigzag paths. Ultimately, their calculations of classical density and action produced a wave function, or distribution of most probable paths that a photon could take, that was exactly the same as what was predicted by the Schrödinger equation, which is the central equation used to describe quantum-mechanical behavior.

“We show that the Schrödinger’s equation of quantum mechanics and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation of classical physics are actually identical given a suitable computation of density,” Slotine says. “That’s a purely mathematical result. We’re not saying that quantum phenomena happens at classical scales. We’re saying you can compute this quantum behavior with very simple classical tools.”

In addition to the double-slit experiment, the researchers showed the reworked equation can also predict other quantum mechanical behavior, such as quantum tunneling, in which particles such as electrons can pass through energy barriers that would not be possible according to classical physics. They could also derive the exact quantum wave of the electron in a hydrogen atom from the classical orbit of a planet. Finally, they revisited from this perspective the famous Einstein-Podolski-Rosen experiment, which started the modern study of quantum entanglement.

The researchers envision that scientists could use the new formula as a simple method to predict how certain quantum systems and devices will perform.

“There could be important implications for quantum computing, where quantum bits have these nonlinear energies that physicists must approximate, or for better understanding problems involving both quantum physics and general relativity,” Slotine offers. “In principle at least, we should now be able to characterize this quantum behavior exactly, with simple classical tools, and show that it’s not so mysterious after all.”

Mitali Chowdhury ’24 and Christina Kim ’24 have been selected as 2026 Gates Cambridge Scholars. The highly competitive fellowship offers fully funded opportunities for postgraduate study in any field at Cambridge University in the U.K. Kim is a second-time Gates Cambridge Scholar.

MIT students interested in the Gates Cambridge Scholar program should contact Kim Benard, associate dean of distinguished fellowships in Career Advising and Professional Development.

Mitali Chowdhury

Chowdury graduated from MIT with a BS in biological engineering and minors in both urban planning and environment and sustainability. Chowdhury has had a longstanding interest in reducing inequities in global health. At MIT, she pursued research in point-of-care diagnostics to identify and treat disease with accessible biotechnologies. She also helped develop low-cost testing for bacterial contamination in water in South Asia.

Chowdury currently works at a startup advancing sequencing-based diagnostics. At Cambridge University, she will study for MPhil and PhD degrees in the Centre for Doctoral Training in Sensor Technologies. Her research will focus on CRISPR-based diagnostics to address antimicrobial resistance and expand equitable access to care.

Christina Kim

After graduating from MIT with a bachelor’s degree in chemistry and biology, Kim worked as a researcher in women’s health at the Wellcome Sanger Institute in Cambridge, U.K. 

As a 2025 Gates Cambridge Scholar, Kim pursued an MPhil in research at the institute, focusing on using bioinformatics and tissue engineering to design novel in vitro models. Her second Gates Cambridge scholarship will fund her PhD studies.

In a world leaning away from globalization, governments face a tough choice: Should they block dominant foreign companies to protect local businesses, or welcome them in hopes of fast-tracking economic growth and modernization? 

In his recently published book, “Traders, Speculators, and Captains of Industry: How Capitalist Legitimacy Shaped Foreign Investment Policy in India” (Harvard University Press, November 2025), Jason Jackson, associate professor in political economy and urban planning in the MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning, explains that these policy decisions aren’t just math, but long-standing and often heated moral debates over how businesses should conduct themselves, and who they serve.

Jackson argues that morality has a long history in economics and deserves more attention because, while ever-present in economic policy discourse, moral beliefs are often under-recognized or underappreciated.

“India is an exemplary case of ways in which moral beliefs shape economic policy decisions,” says Jackson. “But at the same time, I think it’s representative of a general feature of capitalism. It’s the perfect case.”

Jackson’s focus on India for this book stems from his interest in industrial policy and the politics of international development. Multinational firms have long been a source of controversy. They are seen as bringing two crucial resources to developing countries: finance and technology. However, while multinationals are potentially valuable contributors to economic development through the mechanism of foreign direct investment (FDI), they can also be monopolistic, dominating local industries and displacing domestic firms.

This long-standing tension in foreign investment policy became the backdrop for several emerging markets in developing countries — Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) — in the early 2000s. India was growing at an extremely high level — 6-7 percent annually — and Indian companies were doing well, including those in industries that were seen as key to development, such as autos. Jackson wanted to understand why Indian companies were holding their own relative to foreign firms, which dominated more manufacturing in other places, and planned to focus on the period from the 1980s through the 2010s that coincides with the period of economic liberalization in India and, more broadly, with globalization. But while conducting field work, Jackson noticed that in describing how they made industrial policy decisions, Indian policymakers drew distinctions between firms that were fashioned in moral terms. There were some firms that policymakers believed would invest in technology and provide good jobs, and other firms — both foreign and domestic — seen as exploitative and not interested in engaging in activities that would advance economic growth and industrial transformation.

“I realized these distinctions had deep salience,” says Jackson. “My interlocutors would describe firms — especially foreign firms they saw as simply trading, or as exploitative — as ‘New East India’ companies, referencing the famous East India Company that was the governance authority in colonial India, but had been defunct for more than 150 years. That forced my research to become more historical, increasingly relying on archival work to make sense of these moralized distinctions between different types of business actors, whether foreign or domestic, and to understand how these beliefs became so powerful across Indian society.”

“Moral categories of capitalist legitimacy”

Jackson says there are several ways in which social scientists think that policymakers make decisions. One view considers the competing interest groups policymakers must negotiate with, in which case outcomes may depend on one group having more influence or power than others. Another approach assumes these individuals make decisions based on self-interest, particularly when their choices are perceived as corrupt.

“But what I found is that neither of these approaches gave enough credence to the ways in which policymakers in India grapple with quite technical and complex policy decisions regarding the type of development they want to promote in their country, and the types of companies they thought could help to achieve their development goals.” says Jackson. “Therefore, I was more interested in trying to understand what kind of ideas and beliefs animated their decision-making.”

What Jackson found was that Indian policymakers viewed both foreign firms and local Indian companies through what he terms “moral categories of capitalist legitimacy.” Would these firms invest in productive technologies? Would they provide good employment for the local population? Or would they be exploitative? These criteria were not only applied to multinational corporations. Even Indian family-controlled business groups were evaluated as to whether the gains accrued stayed within the confines of the extended family or whether they provided broader societal benefits. 

Coca-Cola goes to India

The story of Coca-Cola in India is an example of the tension experienced with regulating foreign investment where multinational companies were seen as exploitative. The company made its initial foray into India in the 1950s, and over the next two decades its reach became extensive. In the late 1970s, India’s Minister of Industry George Fernandes was visiting a village in Bihar — a state with one of the highest levels of poverty — when he asked for a glass of water. Instead, he was told the water was not suitable to drink, and was given Coca-Cola.

“This struck Fernandes as deeply problematic,” says Jackson. “He later recalled thinking that ‘after 30 years of freedom in India, our villages do not have clean drinking water, but they do have Coca-Cola — which, of course, is made with purified water, so safe to drink. How was this possible?’” Fernandes returned to his office in New Delhi determined to do something about it.

Just a few years earlier, India had passed a law, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), which required foreign companies to dilute their equity to no more than 40 percent. The law was explicitly designed to encourage technology transfer, but Coca-Cola had not complied. Fernandes told Coca-Cola that it had to take on an Indian partner or it would have to leave. Coca-Cola chose the latter. In the following year, IBM was also kicked out of India when it similarly balked at complying with FERA and sharing its technology.

“These companies were very much seen in the mold of the East India Co.,” says Jackson. “A firm comes from abroad and extracts resources from India while giving little benefit to the country. These are all very clearly morally coded beliefs that played a crucial role in these policy decisions.”

With Coca-Cola out of India, the beverage market became wide open, and several Indian companies emerged. Thums Up, an Indian cola brand — founded by Ramesh Chauhan ’62 — took off and became the dominant cola by the 1980s. Chauhan developed its own unique formula independently.

In 1991, India accelerated its economic liberalization, especially around FDI, and FERA’s standards were diluted. Coca-Cola returned to India, again without a partner. Other major brands, including Pepsi, had also entered the market. By then, Thums Up had a market share in India of well over 80 percent, but, concerned with its ability to compete in a war between the deep-pocketed American multinational giants, Thums Up sold out to Coca-Cola for $60 million in 1993, a figure that was later deemed to be small.

Trader, speculator, or captain of industry?

Jackson says that in India, there were two competing interpretations of this story. In one version, Fernandes kicking out a global multinational firm was seen as a developing country establishing its economic sovereignty by making a bold policy decision and “risking all kind of geopolitical blowback that might follow from the U.S.,” says Jackson. “In this view, the Indian government’s bold move allowed local entrepreneurs and local companies like Chauhan and Thums Up to emerge.”

Yet an important counter narrative emerged that challenged the view that companies like Thums Up and figures like Chauhan are enterprising entrepreneurs.

“Maybe they just took advantage of protectionism to form a company and make some money,” says Jackson. “So rather than being an intrepid captain of industry, observers wondered whether maybe Chauhan was ‘simply a trader’ who took advantage of policy protection, but sold out as soon as the market became competitive.”

Later developments added some credibility to this view. Ironically, Coca-Cola was unable to remove Thums Up and Limca, another soda brand from Chauhan’s company, from its product lineup, and both remained extremely popular and widely consumed. This suggested to many observers that Thums Up could have survived the cola wars had it not sold out to the American multinational. The public had acquired a taste for the distinctly Indian beverages that Chauhan had created.

“This narrative encapsulates this kind of tension policymakers face: If we provide policy support to our enterprising entrepreneurs and they thrive, will they also do well for the country? Or are they simply opportunists who will take advantage of policy support in ways that benefit themselves but have little broader benefits to the country,” says Jackson.

This episode was just one of dozens of instances of conflicts between Indian companies and multinational firms in the liberalizing 1990s and 2000s, which the government was often compelled to adjudicate. Throughout this period, the question persisted: How would policymakers identify the business figures who could be agents of industrial development and economic transformation, whether foreign or domestic? 

Ramesh Chauhan for one continued an enterprising path. He turned his attention to the bottled water industry in India and his brand — Bisleri — remains one of the country’s leading bottled water brands today.

The MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center (PSFC) showcased its high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnet technology, essential for fusion energy and increasingly relevant to superhot geothermal applications, to Representative Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass) during his March 12 visit.

High-field electromagnets are required to confine plasma in fusion reactors, and PSFC’s HTS technology enables dramatically higher magnetic fields, allowing for more compact and cost-effective reactor designs. The same HTS technology can also be applied to gyrotrons, which are high-power microwave sources that operate more efficiently at higher frequencies, enabling new energy applications.

One such application is millimeter-wave drilling for superhot geothermal energy, where microwave energy is used to heat, melt, or vaporize rock. Because drilling rates scale with input power and costs increase less rapidly with depth than in conventional drilling, this approach could overcome key economic barriers to accessing deep geothermal resources and enable scalable, baseload clean energy.

During Auchincloss’ recent visit to PSFC, MIT researchers explained the technology development and testing underway to take millimeter-wave technology from laboratory to the real world.

“I visited MIT’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center to learn more about the science and engineering necessary to make this technology work at utility scale. Superhot geothermal uses microwaves to melt rock, going much deeper and hotter than is possible with contact drilling. This can generate clean, baseload power in America east of the Rocky Mountains, where the geology has conventionally not been suitable for industrial geothermal,” says Auchincloss.

“The technology is still years away from working in a state with ‘cool rock’ like Massachusetts, but the ultimate benefit for the Bay State could be tremendous. In addition to lower utility bills, a new industry with good jobs could thrive here. Indeed, this is already starting to happen, as spinouts from MIT — and the suppliers for these spinouts — are already setting up shop in Massachusetts,” he says.

Staff from MIT startup Quaise Energy participated in Auchincloss’ visit to PSFC. Quaise Energy, which has an office in Cambridge, completed a successful drilling demonstration using gyrotron-based millimeter-wave technology last fall in Texas. One of the first rounds of MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI) seed funding provided support for PSFC’s initial development of the technology in 2008.

Superhot rock geothermal energy refers to tapping temperatures of nearly 400 degrees Celsius to generate large amounts of electricity. Conventional drilling approaches can fail at the great depths (several kilometers) and high temperatures required to reach this geothermal resource. The millimeter-wave drilling technology invented at PSFC and being commercialized by Quaise Energy could be faster and more effective than conventional drilling, especially at high temperatures and great depths. PSFC is planning a new laboratory facility to further study millimeter-wave drilling and test improvements to the existing technology.

“This initiative will leverage MIT’s extensive capabilities in geophysics, geochemistry, millimeter-wave technology, and AI, along with existing infrastructure including power, water, and experimental facilities. The goal is to anchor next-generation geothermal innovation within an integrated academic-industry ecosystem, accelerating both technology maturation, de-risking deployment pathways, and developing the needed workforce,” says Steve Wukitch, the interim director and a principal research scientist at PSFC.

Oliver Jagoutz, the Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Geology and director of the Earth Resources Laboratory (ERL), also participated in the representative’s visit to PSFC. ERL is teaming with PSFC on the planned laboratory facility for testing millimeter-wave drilling under representative pressure and temperature conditions and on realistic rock samples.

Earlier in March, MITEI’s Spring Symposium, titled “Next-generation geothermal for firm power,” explored the current state of the geothermal industry, innovative technologies, and the opportunities ahead. During the symposium, Wukitch served as moderator of a panel on drilling advances and described the planned PSFC laboratory facility for millimeter-wave testing, and Quaise Energy’s Matt Houde described the company’s recent advances and future plans. On the following day, MITEI and the Clean Air Task Force co-hosted a gathering of MITEI member companies, next-generation geothermal companies, and investors for a GeoTech Summit, titled “Accelerating geothermal technology, projects, and deal flow.”

A national housing shortage is straining finances and communities across the United States. In Massachusetts, at least 222,000 homes will have to be built in the next 10 years to meet the population's needs. At the same time, there are numerous challenges in traditional construction. There's a shortage of skilled construction workers. Most projects involve multiple contractors and subcontractors, adding complexity and lag time. And the construction process, as well as the buildings themselves, can be a major source of emissions that contribute to climate change.

Reframe Systems, co-founded by Vikas Enti SM '20, uses robotics, software, and high-performance materials to address these problems. Founded in 2022, the company deploys microfactories that bring housing fabrication and production closer to the regions where the homes are needed. The first homes designed and manufactured in Reframe's first microfactory have been fully built in Arlington and Somerville, Massachusetts. 

Enti's experiences in MIT System Design and Management (SDM) shaped the company from its start. "Learning how to navigate the system and finding the optimal value for each stakeholder has been a key part of the business strategy," he says, "and that's rooted in what I learned at SDM."

Better tools for system-level problems

Enti applied to SDM's master of science in engineering and management while he was working at Kiva Systems, overseeing its acquisition by Amazon and transformation into Amazon Robotics. He found that the SDM program's fundamentals of systems engineering, system architecture, and project management provided him with the tools he needed to address system-level problems in his work.

While he was at MIT, Enti also served as an associate director for the MIT $100K Entrepreneurship Competition, which offers students and researchers mentorship, feedback, and potential funding for their startup ideas. He realized that "there isn't a single formula for how businesses start, or how long it takes to get them started," he says, which helped shape his plans to start his own business.

Enti took a leave of absence from MIT to oversee the expansion of Amazon Robotics in Europe. He returned and completed his degree in 2020, writing his thesis on developing technology that could mitigate falls for elderly people. This instinct to use his education for a good cause resurfaced when his daughters were born. He wanted his future business to address a real-world problem and have a social impact, while also reducing carbon emissions.

Growing housing, shrinking emissions

Enti concluded that housing, with immediate real-world impact and a significant share of global carbon emissions, was the right problem to work on. He reached out to his colleagues Aaron Small and Felipe Polido from Amazon Robotics to share his idea for advanced, low-cost factories that could be deployed quickly and close to where they were needed. The two joined him as co-founders.

Currently, the microfactory in Andover, Massachusetts, produces structural panels, with robotics completing wall and ceiling framing and people completing the rest of the work, including wiring and plumbing. Eventually, Reframe hopes to automate more of the building process through further use of robotics. The modular construction process allows for reduced waste and disruption on the eventual home site. And the finished homes are designed to be energy-efficient and ready for solar panel installation. The company is set to start work soon on a group of homes in Devens, Massachusetts.

In addition to the Andover location, Reframe is setting up in southern California to help rebuild homes that were destroyed in the area's January 2025 wildfires. The company's software-assisted design process and the adjustability of the microfactories allows them to meet local zoning and building codes and align with the local architectural aesthetic. This means that in Somerville, Reframe's completed buildings look like modernized versions of the neighboring three-story buildings, known locally as "triple-deckers." On the other side of the country, Reframe's design offerings include Spanish-style and craftsman homes.

"Housing is a complex systems problem," Enti says, explaining the impact SDM has had on his work at Reframe. The methods and tools taught in the integrated core class EM.412 (Foundations of System Design and Management) help him tackle systems-level problems and take the needs of multiple stakeholders into account. The Reframe team used technology roadmapping as they devised their overall business plan, inspired by the work of Olivier de Weck, associate head of the MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. And lectures on project management from Bryan Moser, SDM's academic director, remain relevant. 

"Embracing the fact that this is a systems problem, and learning how to navigate the system and the stakeholders to make sure we're finding the optimal value, has been a key part of the business strategy," Enti says.

Reframe Systems is set to continue learning through iteration as they plan to expand their network of microfactories. The company remains committed to the core vision of sustainably meeting the country's need for more housing. "I'm grateful we get to do this," Enti says. "Once you strip away all the robotics, the advanced algorithms, and the factories, these are high-quality, healthy homes that families get to live in and grow." 

People building the future of the social web — interoperable and decentralized — need to protect themselves against copyright liability. Like anyone who creates and operates platforms for user-uploaded content, the hosts of the decentralized social web can take preventive measures to reduce their legal exposure when a user posts material that violates someone’s copyright.

This post gives an overview of the steps to take. It’s meant for operators of Mastodon and other ActivityPub servers, Bluesky hosts, RSS mirrors, and other decentralized social media protocols, and developers of apps for those protocols — but it will apply to other hosts as well. This isn’t legal advice, and can’t substitute for a consultation with a lawyer about your specific circumstances. It focuses on U.S. law — the law may impose different requirements elsewhere. Still, we hope it helps you get started with confidence.

Why should I care? Copyright’s Sword of Damocles

In some circumstances, the operator of a platform that handles user content can be legally responsible for content that infringes copyright. That can happen when the platform operator is directly involved in copying or distributing the copyrighted material, when they promote or knowingly assist the infringement, or when they benefit financially from infringement while being in a position to supervise it. But these judge-made rules are often difficult and uncertain to apply in practice — and the penalties for being found on the wrong side of the law can be severe. Copyright’s “statutory damages” regime allows for massive, unpredictable financial liability. That’s why it’s important to limit your risk.

For Server Operators: Limiting Risk with the DMCA Safe Harbors

If you run a social network server, the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) are an important way to limit your liability risk. The DMCA shields server operators from nearly all forms of copyright liability that can result from “storage at the direction of a user” — in other words, hosting user-uploaded content. But to qualify for this protection, there are steps a server operator has to take.

1. Designate A Contact To Receive Copyright Infringement Notices

First, you’ll need to provide contact information for someone who can receive infringement notices (a “designated agent”). That information needs to be posted in at least two places: on your server in a place visible to users (such as a “DMCA” page or post, or as part of your Terms of Service), and in the U.S. Copyright Office’s “Designated Agent Directory.” To post that information to the directory, you have to create an account at https://www.copyright.gov/dmca-directory/ and pay a small fee. The directory listings expire after three years, and once expired, your safe harbor protection goes away, so it’s important to keep that listing current.

2. Respond Promptly to Notices and Counter-notices

When you receive infringement notices, it’s important to respond to them promptly. Notices are supposed to identify the copyright holder, the copyrighted work they claim was infringed, and the post they claim is infringing. By deleting or disabling access to the posted material, you protect yourself from liability with respect to that material.

The theory behind Section 512 is that hosts don’t have to be in a position of deciding whether a post infringes someone’s copyright — it’s up to the poster, the rights holder, and potentially a court to decide that. A host who takes down posts whenever they receive an infringement notice is well-protected. But it’s equally important to recognize that hosts aren’t required to take down content in response to every notice. Infringement notices are frequently wrong, misguided, or abusive, or simply incomplete. Hosts who want to stand up for their users’ speech can choose to disregard infringement notices that seem suspect. While this risks losing the automatic protection of the safe harbor in each instance, it can still be done safely with careful preparation, ideally using a plan crafted with help from a lawyer. Bear in mind that people sending false notices, including by failing to consider whether a post is a fair use before asking a host to take it down, can be liable for damages under the DMCA.

The DMCA also allows the person who posted the material to send a “counter-notification” asserting that they really did have the right to post and that there’s no copyright infringement. Responding to counter-notifications is a good way for a host to demonstrate that they look out for their users. When a host receives a counter-notification, they should forward it on to the person who sent the original takedown notice and let them know that the post will be restored in 10 business days. Then, after that waiting period has elapsed, the host can restore the posted material. Just like with infringement notices, a host isn’t required to honor a counter-notification that appears to be fraudulent, but there’s no penalty for honoring it anyway.

3. Have A Repeat Infringer Policy

The next requirement is to have a policy of terminating the accounts of “subscribers and account holders” who are “repeat infringers” in “appropriate circumstances,” and to carry out that policy. Yes, that’s a vague requirement. It doesn’t require a “three strikes” policy or any other sports analogy. It just needs to be reasonable. Be sure your policy is spelled out in your website terms or “DMCA” page.

4. Don’t Ignore Known Infringement

Hosts need to take down user posts whenever the host actually knows that the post is infringing. In other words, a host isn’t protected if they ignore takedown notices based on technicalities in the notices, or if they learn about the infringement some other way. But hosts don’t need to actively look for infringement on their servers — only to act when someone notifies them.

5. Don’t Encourage Infringement

Finally, make sure that nothing you post or advertise actively encourages copyright infringement. For example, don’t post examples of users uploading copyrighted music or video without permission, or insinuate that your server is a good place for infringing content.

There are some other technicalities in the DMCA that can affect the safe harbor, which is why it’s always a good idea to consult with a lawyer. But following these steps will help protect you when you run a social media server — or any other kind of user-uploaded content platform.

It’s an essential insight about our world: Innovation drives economic growth. For the U.S. to thrive, it must keep innovating. But how, and in what areas?

A new book co-authored by MIT faculty members focuses on six key areas where technology advances can drive the economy and support national security.

Those sectors — semiconductors, biotechnology, critical minerals, drones, quantum computing, and advanced manufacturing — are all built on U.S. know-how but are also areas where the country has either yielded a lead in production or innovation, or could yet fall behind.

As the book explains, a roadmap for U.S. prosperity and security involves sustaining notable areas of innovation and the national research ecosystem behind them, while rebuilding domestic manufacturing.

“In each of these areas, there are breakthroughs to be had, where the U.S. can leapfrog competitors and gain an advantage,” says Elisabeth Reynolds, an MIT expert on industrial innovation and editor of the new volume. “That’s a very exciting part of this.” She adds: “These areas are front and center for U.S. national economic and security policy.”

The book, “Priority Technologies: Ensuring U.S. Security and Shared Prosperity,” is published this week by the MIT Press. It features chapters by MIT faculty with expertise on the industrial sectors in question. Reynolds, a professor of the practice in MIT’s Department of Urban Studies and Planning, is a leading expert on industrial innovation and has long advocated for innovation-based growth that helps the U.S. workforce.

“All of this can be good for everyone,” says MIT economist Simon Johnson, who wrote the foreword to the book. “Out of that flow of innovations and ideas, we can create more good jobs for all Americans. Pushing the technological frontier and turning that into jobs is definitely going to help.”

Making more chips

“Priority Technologies” grew out of an ongoing MIT seminar by the same name, which Reynolds and Johnson began holding in 2023, often with appearances by other MIT faculty.

Both Reynolds and Johnson bring vast experience to the subject of innovation and production. Among other things, Reynolds headed MIT’s Industrial Performance Center for over a decade and was executive director of the MIT Task Force on the Work of the Future. She served in the White House National Economic Council as special assistant to the president for manufacturing and development.

Johnson, the Ronald A. Kurtz (1954) Professor of Entrepreneurship at the MIT Sloan School of Management, shared the 2024 Nobel Prize in economics, with MIT’s Daron Acemoglu and the University of Chicago’s James Robinson, for work about the historical relationship between institutions and economic growth. He has co-authored numerous books, including, with Acemoglu, the 2023 book “Power and Progress,” about the trajectory and implications of artificial intelligence.

As it happens, “Priority Technologies” does not focus on AI, instead opting to examine other vital, and often related, areas of innovation.

“We do not think this is the entire list of priority technologies,” Johnson says. “This is a partial list, and there are lots of other ideas.”

In the chapter on semiconductors, Jesús A. del Alamo, the Donner Professor of Science in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, calls them “the oxygen of modern society.” This U.S.-born industry has seen a large manufacturing shift away from the country, however, leaving it vulnerable in terms of security and the economy; about one-third of inflation experienced in 2021 stemmed from a chip shortage. As he notes, the U.S. is now in the process of rebuilding its capacity to make leading-edge logic chips, for one thing.

“With semiconductors, people thought the U.S. could lose the manufacturing, stay on top of the innovation and design side, and would be fine,” Reynolds says. “But it’s turned out to make the country quite vulnerable. So we’ve had a massive shift to rebuild semiconductor manufacturing capabilities here in the U.S., and I would argue that’s been a successful strategy in recent years.”

Bringing biotech back home

In biotechnology, relocating manufacturing in the U.S. is also key, using new technologies in the process. As J. Christopher Love, the Laurent Professor of Chemical Engineering, puts it in his chapter, while the U.S. is the leader in biotech research, it “lacks the manufacturing infrastructure and expertise necessary to bring these ideas to the market at the same pace as it generates innovative new products.” Among other remedies, he suggests that smaller, more flexible production facilities can help the U.S. “leapfrog” other countries on the manufacturing side. Love is also co-director of MIT’s Initiative for New Manufacturing, which aims to drive advances in U.S. production across industries.

“We have tremendous biotech innovation, we’re the leaders, but we have a bottleneck when it comes manufacturing,” Reynolds observes. “If we can break through that with new technologies, new production processes, we’re in a position to make us less vulnerable, from a supply chain point of view, and capture more of what is going to be a $4 trillion market over the next 15 years.”

A similar story holds in other areas. Many drone innovations were developed in the U.S., while much manufacturing has shifted to China. Fiona Murray, the William Porter (1967) Professor of Entrepreneurship, writes that the U.S. has an “opportunity to rebuild its production at scale,” although that will also require significant strengthening of its supply chains, too.

Elsa Olivetti, the Jerry McAfee (1940) Professor of Engineering and a professor of materials science and engineering, recommends a multifaceted approach to help the U.S. regain traction in the production of critical minerals, including better forms of extraction, manufacturing, and recycling, to reduce potential scarcities.

And in the quantum computing chapter, two MIT co-authors — William D. Oliver, the Henry Ellis Warren (1894) Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and a professor of physics; and Jonathan Ruane, a senior lecturer at MIT Sloan — note that the sector could help accelerate drug discovery, materials science, and energy applications. Noting that the U.S. still leads in private-sector investment in the field but tails China in public-sector investment, they urge more research support and stronger supply chains for quantum computing components, among other recommendations.

“The country that achieves quantum leadership will gain decisive advantages in these strategically important industries,” they write.

The university engine

From industry to industry, the book makes clear that certain key issues are broadly important to U.S. competitiveness and growth. The partnership between the federal government and the world-leading research capacities of U.S. universities, for one thing, has given the country an initial lead in many economic sectors and promises to continue driving innovation.

At the same time, the U.S. would benefit from expanding and strengthening its domestic supply chains, in the process of building up more domestic manufacturing, and needs capital investment that will help hardware-side, physically substantial industrial growth.

“These common themes include supply chain resilience and manufacturing capability,” Reynolds says. “Can we help drive the country’s innovation ecosystem through expansion of our industrial system and manufacturing? That’s a big question.”

On the research front, she reflects, over the years, “It’s been amazing how much MIT-led research has aligned with national priorities — or maybe that’s not so surprising.”

The partnership between the U.S. federal government and universities as research engines was formalized in the 1940s, thanks in part to then-MIT president Vannevar Bush. According to some estimates, government investment in non-defense research and development alone has accounted for up to 25 percent of U.S. economic growth since World War II.

“Vannevar Bush realized it wasn’t about a stock of technology, it was about a flow of innovation,” Johnson says. “And that brilliant insight is still relevant today. I think that is the insight of the last century. And that’s what we’re trying to capture and reiterate and repeat.”

“This is not even the future. This is current.”

Scholars and industry leaders have praised “Priority Technologies.” Erica Fuchs, a professor of engineering and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University, has stated that when it comes to “ensuring American national security, economic competitiveness, and societal well-being,” the book underscores “the positive role technology can play in those outcomes.” Hemant Taneja, CEO of the venture capital firm General Catalyst, calls the volume “required reading for anyone interested in building the abundant, resilient future America deserves.”

For their part, Reynolds and Johnson hope the book will draw many kinds of readers interested in the economy, innovation, prosperity, and national security.

“We tried to make the volume accessible,” Reynolds says, noting that the book directly lays out “challenges for the country, and what we see as recommendations for next steps in how we position the country to succeed, and lead globally. Each of these chapters has something important to say.”

Johnson also notes the MIT scholars participating in the project want to enhance the ongoing policy conversation, in Washington and across the country, about supporting innovation and using it to drive U.S. economic and technological leadership.

“One reason to write a book is, you can’t pound the table with a podcast,” quips Johnson, who co-hosts a podcast, “Power and Consequences,” on major policy issues. In conversations with political leaders and their staffs, he adds, there is a core message to be transmitted about America and technology-driven growth: We have the knowledge and resources, but need to focus on supporting innovation while trying to increase domestic production.

“Here are the technologies we currently need,” Johnson says. “This is not imagination, this is not fanciful, this is not science fiction. This is not even the future. This is current. These are the technologies needed to defend the country and its interests. And we need to invest in these, and in everything we need to drive them forward.”