Transistors, the building blocks of modern electronics, are typically made of silicon. Because it’s a semiconductor, this material can control the flow of electricity in a circuit. But silicon has fundamental physical limits that restrict how compact and energy-efficient a transistor can be.

MIT researchers have now replaced silicon with a magnetic semiconductor, creating a magnetic transistor that could enable smaller, faster, and more energy-efficient circuits. The material’s magnetism strongly influences its electronic behavior, leading to more efficient control of the flow of electricity. 

The team used a novel magnetic material and an optimization process that reduces the material’s defects, which boosts the transistor’s performance.

The material’s unique magnetic properties also allow for transistors with built-in memory, which would simplify circuit design and unlock new applications for high-performance electronics.

“People have known about magnets for thousands of years, but there are very limited ways to incorporate magnetism into electronics. We have shown a new way to efficiently utilize magnetism that opens up a lot of possibilities for future applications and research,” says Chung-Tao Chou, an MIT graduate student in the departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) and Physics, and co-lead author of a paper on this advance.

Chou is joined on the paper by co-lead author Eugene Park, a graduate student in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE); Julian Klein, a DMSE research scientist; Josep Ingla-Aynes, a postdoc in the MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center; Jagadeesh S. Moodera, a senior research scientist in the Department of Physics; and senior authors Frances Ross, TDK Professor in DMSE; and Luqiao Liu, an associate professor in EECS, and a member of the Research Laboratory of Electronics; as well as others at the University of Chemistry and Technology in Prague. The paper appears today in Physical Review Letters.

Overcoming the limits

In an electronic device, silicon semiconductor transistors act like tiny light switches that turn a circuit on and off, or amplify weak signals in a communication system. They do this using a small input voltage.

But a fundamental physical limit of silicon semiconductors prevents a transistor from operating below a certain voltage, which hinders its energy efficiency.

To make more efficient electronics, researchers have spent decades working toward magnetic transistors that utilize electron spin to control the flow of electricity. Electron spin is a fundamental property that enables electrons to behave like tiny magnets.

So far, scientists have mostly been limited to using certain magnetic materials. These lack the favorable electronic properties of semiconductors, constraining device performance.

“In this work, we combine magnetism and semiconductor physics to realize useful spintronic devices,” Liu says.

The researchers replace the silicon in the surface layer of a transistor with chromium sulfur bromide, a two-dimensional material that acts as a magnetic semiconductor.

Due to the material’s structure, researchers can switch between two magnetic states very cleanly. This makes it ideal for use in a transistor that smoothly switches between “on” and “off.”

“One of the biggest challenges we faced was finding the right material. We tried many other materials that didn’t work,” Chou says.

They discovered that changing these magnetic states modifies the material’s electronic properties, enabling low-energy operation. And unlike many other 2D materials, chromium sulfur bromide remains stable in air.

To make a transistor, the researchers pattern electrodes onto a silicon substrate, then carefully align and transfer the 2D material on top. They use tape to pick up a tiny piece of material, only a few tens of nanometers thick, and place it onto the substrate.

“A lot of researchers will use solvents or glue to do the transfer, but transistors require a very clean surface. We eliminate all those risks by simplifying this step,” Chou says.

Leveraging magnetism

This lack of contamination enables their device to outperform existing magnetic transistors. Most others can only create a weak magnetic effect, changing the flow of current by a few percent or less. Their new transistor can switch or amplify the electric current by a factor of 10.

They use an external magnetic field to change the magnetic state of the material, switching the transistor using significantly less energy than would usually be required.

The material also allows them to control the magnetic states with electric current. This is important because engineers cannot apply magnetic fields to individual transistors in an electronic device. They need to control each one electrically.

The material’s magnetic properties could also enable transistors with built-in memory, simplifying the design of logic or memory circuits.

A typical memory device has a magnetic cell to store information and a transistor to read it out. Their method can combine both into one magnetic transistor.

“Now, not only are transistors turning on and off, they are also remembering information. And because we can switch the transistor with greater magnitude, the signal is much stronger so we can read out the information faster, and in a much more reliable way,” Liu says.

Building on this demonstration, the researchers plan to further study the use of electrical current to control the device. They are also working to make their method scalable so they can fabricate arrays of transistors.

This research was supported, in part, by the Semiconductor Research Corporation, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Army Research Office, and the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports. The work was partially carried out at the MIT.nano facilities.

A new species of squid. pretends to be a plant:

Scientists have filmed a never-before-seen species of deep-sea squid burying itself upside down in the seafloor—a behavior never documented in cephalopods. They captured the bizarre scene while studying the depths of the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ), an abyssal plain in the Pacific Ocean targeted for deep-sea mining.

The team described the encounter in a study published Nov. 25 in the journal Ecology, writing that the animal appears to be an undescribed species of whiplash squid. At a depth of roughly 13,450 feet (4,100 meters), the squid had buried almost its entire body in sediment and was hanging upside down, with its siphon and two long ...

To what extent can an artificial system be rational?

A new MIT course, 6.S044/24.S00 (AI and Rationality), doesn’t seek to answer this question. Instead, it challenges students to explore this and other philosophical problems through the lens of AI research. For the next generation of scholars, concepts of rationality and agency could prove integral in AI decision-making, especially when influenced by how humans understand their own cognitive limits and their constrained, subjective views of what is or isn’t rational.

This inquiry is rooted in a deep relationship between computer science and philosophy, which have long collaborated in formalizing what it is to form rational beliefs, learn from experience, and make rational decisions in pursuit of one's goals.

“You’d imagine computer science and philosophy are pretty far apart, but they’ve always intersected. The technical parts of philosophy really overlap with AI, especially early AI,” says course instructor Leslie Kaelbling, the Panasonic Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at MIT, calling to mind Alan Turing, who was both a computer scientist and a philosopher. Kaelbling herself holds an undergraduate degree in philosophy from Stanford University, noting that computer science wasn’t available as a major at the time.

Brian Hedden, a professor in the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, holding an MIT Schwarzman College of Computing shared position with the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), who teaches the class with Kaelbling, notes that the two disciplines are more aligned than people might imagine, adding that the “differences are in emphasis and perspective.”

Tools for further theoretical thinking

Offered for the first time in fall 2025, Kaelbling and Hedden created AI and Rationality as part of the Common Ground for Computing Education, a cross-cutting initiative of the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing that brings multiple departments together to develop and teach new courses and launch new programs that blend computing with other disciplines.

With over two dozen students registered, AI and Rationality is one of two Common Ground classes with a foundation in philosophy, the other being 6.C40/24.C40 (Ethics of Computing).

While Ethics of Computing explores concerns about the societal impacts of rapidly advancing technology, AI and Rationality examines the disputed definition of rationality by considering several components: the nature of rational agency, the concept of a fully autonomous and intelligent agent, and the ascription of beliefs and desires onto these systems.

Because AI is extremely broad in its implementation and each use case raises different issues, Kaelbling and Hedden brainstormed topics that could provide fruitful discussion and engagement between the two perspectives of computer science and philosophy.

“It's important when I work with students studying machine learning or robotics that they step back a bit and examine the assumptions they’re making,” Kaelbling says. “Thinking about things from a philosophical perspective helps people back up and understand better how to situate their work in actual context.”

Both instructors stress that this isn’t a course that provides concrete answers to questions on what it means to engineer a rational agent.

Hedden says, “I see the course as building their foundations. We’re not giving them a body of doctrine to learn and memorize and then apply. We’re equipping them with tools to think about things in a critical way as they go out into their chosen careers, whether they’re in research or industry or government.”

The rapid progress of AI also presents a new set of challenges in academia. Predicting what students may need to know five years from now is something Kaelbling sees as an impossible task. “What we need to do is give them the tools at a higher level — the habits of mind, the ways of thinking — that will help them approach the stuff that we really can’t anticipate right now,” she says.

Blending disciplines and questioning assumptions

So far, the class has drawn students from a wide range of disciplines — from those firmly grounded in computing to others interested in exploring how AI intersects with their own fields of study.

Throughout the semester’s reading and discussions, students grappled with different definitions of rationality and how they pushed back against assumptions in their fields.

On what surprised her about the course, Amanda Paredes Rioboo, a senior in EECS, says, “We’re kind of taught that math and logic are this golden standard or truth. This class showed us a variety of examples that humans act inconsistently with these mathematical and logical frameworks. We opened up this whole can of worms as to whether, is it humans that are irrational? Is it the machine learning systems that we designed that are irrational? Is it math and logic itself?”

Junior Okoroafor, a PhD student in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, was appreciative of the class’s challenges and the ways in which the definition of a rational agent could change depending on the discipline. “Representing what each field means by rationality in a formal framework, makes it clear exactly which assumptions are to be shared, and which were different, across fields.”

The co-teaching, collaborative structure of the course, as with all Common Ground endeavors, gave students and the instructors opportunities to hear different perspectives in real-time.

For Paredes Rioboo, this is her third Common Ground course. She says, “I really like the interdisciplinary aspect. They’ve always felt like a nice mix of theoretical and applied from the fact that they need to cut across fields.”

According to Okoroafor, Kaelbling and Hedden demonstrated an obvious synergy between fields, saying that it felt as if they were engaging and learning along with the class. How computer science and philosophy can be used to inform each other allowed him to understand their commonality and invaluable perspectives on intersecting issues.

He adds, “philosophy also has a way of surprising you.”

From an Anthropic blog post:

In a recent evaluation of AI models’ cyber capabilities, current Claude models can now succeed at multistage attacks on networks with dozens of hosts using only standard, open-source tools, instead of the custom tools needed by previous generations. This illustrates how barriers to the use of AI in relatively autonomous cyber workflows are rapidly coming down, and highlights the importance of security fundamentals like promptly patching known vulnerabilities.

[…]

A notable development during the testing of Claude Sonnet 4.5 is that the model can now succeed on a minority of the networks without the custom cyber toolkit needed by previous generations. In particular, Sonnet 4.5 can now exfiltrate all of the (simulated) personal information in a high-fidelity simulation of the Equifax data breach—one of the costliest cyber attacks in history­­using only a Bash shell on a widely-available Kali Linux host (standard, open-source tools for penetration testing; not a custom toolkit). Sonnet 4.5 accomplishes this by instantly recognizing a publicized CVE and writing code to exploit it without needing to look it up or iterate on it. Recalling that the original Equifax breach happened by exploiting a publicized CVE that had not yet been patched, the prospect of highly competent and fast AI agents leveraging this approach underscores the pressing need for security best practices like prompt updates and patches...

New treatments based on biological molecules like RNA give scientists unprecedented control over how cells function. But delivering those drugs to the right tissues remains one of the biggest obstacles to turning these promising yet fragile molecules into powerful new treatments.

Now Gensaic, founded by Lavi Erisson MBA ’19; Uyanga Tsedev SM ’15, PhD ’21; and Jonathan Hsu PhD ’22, is building an artificial intelligence-powered discovery engine to develop protein shuttles that can deliver therapeutic molecules like RNA to specific tissues and cells in the body. The company is using its platform to create advanced treatments for metabolic diseases and other conditions. It is also developing treatments in partnership with Novo Nordisk and exploring additional collaborations to amplify the speed and scale of its impact.

The founders believe their delivery technology — combined with advanced therapies that precisely control gene expression, like RNA interference (RNAi) and small activating RNA (saRNA) — will enable new ways of improving health and treating disease.

“I think the therapeutic space in general is going to explode with the possibilities our approach unlocks,” Erisson says. “RNA has become a clinical-grade commodity that we know is safe. It is easy to synthesize, and it has unparalleled specificity and reversibility. By taking that and combining it with our targeting and delivery, we can change the therapeutic landscape.”

Drinking from the firehose

Erisson worked on drug development at the large pharmaceutical company Teva Pharmaceuticals before coming to MIT for his Sloan Fellows MBA in 2018.

“I came to MIT in large part because I was looking to stretch the boundaries of how I apply critical thinking,” Erisson says. “At that point in my career, I had taken about 10 drug programs into clinical development, with products on the market now. But what I didn’t have were the intellectual and quantitative tools for interrogating finance strategy and other disciplines that aren’t purely scientific. I knew I’d be drinking from the firehose coming to MIT.”

Erisson met Hsu and Tsedev, then PhD students at MIT, in a class taught by professors Harvey Lodish and Andrew Lo. The group started holding weekly meetings to discuss their research and the prospect of starting a business.

After Erisson completed his MBA program in 2019, he became chief medical and business officer at the MIT spinout Iterative Health, a company using AI to improve screening for colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease that has raised over $200 million to date. There, Erisson ran a 1,400-patient study and led the development and clearance of the company’s software product.

During that time, the eventual founders continued to meet at Erisson’s house to discuss promising research avenues, including Tsedev’s work in the lab of Angela Belcher, MIT’s James Mason Crafts Professor of Biological Engineering. Tsedev’s research involved using bacteriophages, which are fast-replicating protein particles, to deliver treatments into hard-to-drug places like the brain.

As Hsu and Tsedev neared completion of their PhDs, the team decided to commercialize the technology, founding Gensaic at the end of 2021. Gensaic’s approach uses a method called unbiased directed evolution to find the best protein scaffolding to reach target tissues in the body.

“Directed evolution means having a lot of different species of proteins competing together for a certain function,” Erisson says. “The proteins are competing for the ability to reach the right cell, and we are then able to look at the genetic code of the protein that has ‘won’ that competition. When we do that process repeatedly, we find extremely adaptable proteins that can achieve the function we’re looking for.”

Initially, the founders focused on developing protein scaffolds to deliver gene therapies. Gensaic has since pivoted to focus on delivering molecules like siRNA and RNAi, which have been hard to deliver outside of the liver.

Today Gensaic has screened more than 500 billion different proteins using a process called phage display and directed evolution. It calls its platform FORGE, for Functional Optimization by Recursive Genetic Evolution.

Erisson says Gensaic’s delivery vehicles can also carry multiple RNA molecules into cells at the same time, giving doctors a novel and powerful set of tools to treat and prevent diseases.

“Today FORGE is built into the idea of multifunctional medicines,” Erisson says. “We are moving into a future where we can extract multiple therapeutic mechanisms from a single molecule. We can combine proteins with multiple tissue selectivity and multiple molecules of siRNA or other therapeutic modalities, and affect complex disease system biology with a single molecule.”

A “universe of opportunity”

The founders believe their approach will enable new ways of improving health by delivering advanced therapies directly to new places in the body. Precise delivery of drugs to anywhere in the body could not only unlock new therapeutic targets but also boost the effectiveness of existing treatments and reduce side effects.

“We’ve found we can get to the brain, and we can get to specific tissues like skeletal and adipose tissue,” Erisson says. “We’re the only company, to my knowledge, that has a protein-based delivery mechanism to get to adipose tissue.”

Delivering drugs into fat and muscle cells could be used to help people lose weight, retain muscle, and prevent conditions like fatty liver disease or osteoporosis.

Erisson says combining RNA therapeutics is another differentiator for Gensaic.

“The idea of multiplexed medicines is just emerging,” Erisson says. “There are no clinically approved drugs using dual-targeted siRNAs, especially ones that have multi-tissue targeting. We are focused on metabolic indications that have two targets at the same time and can take on unique tissues or combinations of tissues.”

Gensaic’s collaboration with Novo Nordisk, announced last year, targets cardiometabolic diseases and includes up to $354 million in upfront and milestone payments per disease target.

“We already know we can deliver multiple types of payloads, and Novo Nordisk is not limited to siRNA, so we can go after diseases in ways that aren’t available to other companies,” Erisson says. “We are too small to try to swallow this universe of opportunity on our own, but the potential of this platform is incredibly large. Patients deserve safer medicines and better outcomes than what are available now.”

A new rule by the Small Business Administration allows federal officials to waive state and local permitting requirements for disaster loan recipients, raising alarms about a broader federal power grab.

President Donald Trump’s regulatory czar is shoring up language for the inevitable court battle.

The attorneys general argue the new section in the reference manual "would be the final nail in the coffin of American-produced energy."

The Trump administration’s hands-off approach to the Colorado River fight has seven states careening toward a water and power crisis.

The governor’s administration is discussing potential changes to the state’s climate mandates amid affordability and reliability concerns.

State legislators have proposed new fees on retail deliveries to raise money for transportation. Big Tech is fighting back.

Asset managers are betting that rising energy demand and the improving economics of renewables will continue to drive investment.

The advance of green finance in China is being spurred by a growing body of dozens of national policies supporting the sector.

Researchers found parts of South Africa, Mozambique and Zimbabwe were hit with a year’s worth of rain in 10 days.

The modern world runs on chemicals and fuels that require a huge amount of energy to produce: Industrial chemical separation accounts for 10 to 15 percent of the world’s total energy consumption. That’s because most separations today rely on heat to boil off unwanted materials and isolate compounds.

The MIT spinout Osmoses is making industrial chemical separations more efficient by reducing the need for all that heat. The company, founded by former MIT postdoc Francesco Maria Benedetti; Katherine Mizrahi Rodriguez ’17, PhD ’22; Professor Zachary Smith; and Holden Lai, has developed a polymer technology capable of filtering gases with unprecedented selectivity.

Gases — consisting of some of the smallest molecules in the world — have historically been the hardest to separate. Osmoses says its membranes enable industrial customers to increase production, use less energy, and operate in a smaller footprint than is possible using conventional heat-based separation processes.

Osmoses has already begun working with partners to demonstrate its technology’s performance, including its ability to upgrade biogas, which involves separating CO2 and methane. The company also has projects in the works to recover hydrogen from large chemical facilities and, in a partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy, to pull helium from underground hydrogen wells.

“Chemical separations really matter, and they are a bottleneck to innovation and progress in an industry where innovation is challenging, yet an existential need,” Benedetti says. “We want to make it easier for our customers to reach their revenue targets, their decarbonization goals, and expand their markets to move the industry forward.”

Better separations

Benedetti joined Smith’s lab in MIT’s Department of Chemical Engineering in 2017. He was joined by Mizrahi Rodriguez the following year, and the pair spent the next few years conducting fundamental research into membrane materials for gas separations, collaborating with chemists at MIT and beyond, including Lai as he conducted his PhD at Stanford University with Professor Yan Xia.

“I was fascinated by the projects [Smith] was thinking about,” Benedetti says. “It was high-risk, high-reward, and that’s something I love. I had the opportunity to work with talented chemists, and they were synthesizing amazing polymers. The idea was for us chemical engineers at MIT to study those polymers, support chemists in taking next steps, and find an application in the separations world.”

The researchers slowly iterated on the membranes, gradually achieving better performance until, in 2020, a group including Lai, Benedetti, Xia, and Smith broke records for gas separation selectivity with a class of three-dimensional polymers whose structural backbone could be tuned to optimize performance. They filed patents with Stanford and MIT over the next two years, publishing their results in the journal Science in 2022.

“We were facing a decision of what to do with this incredible innovation,” Benedetti recalls. “By then, we’d published a lot of papers where, as the introduction, we described the huge energy footprint of thermal gas separations and the potential of membranes to solve that. We thought rather than wait for somebody to pick up the paper and do something with it, we wanted to lead the effort to commercialize the technology.”

Benedetti joined forces with Mizrahi Rodriguez, Lai, and industrial advisor Xinjin Zhao PhD ’92 to go through the National Science Foundation’s I-Corps Program, which challenges researchers to speak to potential customers in industry. The researchers interviewed more than 100 people, which confirmed for them the huge impact their technology could have.

Benedetti received grants from the MIT Deshpande Center for Technological Innovation, MIT Sandbox, and was a fellow with the MIT Energy Initiative. Osmoses also won the MIT $100K Entrepreneurship Competition in 2021, the same year they founded the company.

“I spent a lot of time talking to stakeholders of companies, and it was a window into the challenges the industry is facing,” Benedetti says. “It helped me determine this was a problem they were facing, and showed me the problem was massive. We realized if we could solve the problem, we could change the world.”

Today, Benedetti says more than 90 percent of energy in the chemicals industry is used to thermally separate gases. One study in Nature found that replacing thermal distillation could reduce annual U.S. energy costs by $4 billion and save 100 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions.

Made up of a class of molecules with tunable structures called hydrocarbon ladder polymers, Osmoses’ membranes are capable of filtering gas molecules with high levels of selectivity, at scale. The technology reduces the size of separation systems, making it easier to add to existing spaces and lowering upfront costs for customers.

“This technology is a paradigm shift with respect to how most separations are happening in industry today,” Benedetti says. “It doesn’t require any thermal processes, which is the reason why the chemical and petrochemical industries have such high energy consumption. There are huge inefficiencies in how separations are done today because of the traditional systems used.”

From the lab to the world

In the lab, the founders were making single grams of their membrane polymers for experiments. Since then, they’ve scaled up production dramatically, reducing the cost of the material with an eye toward producing potentially hundreds of kilograms in the future.

The company is currently working toward its first pilot project upgrading biogas at a landfill operated by a large utility in North America. It is also planning a pilot at a dairy farm in North America. Mizrahi Rodriguez says waste gas from landfills and agricultural make up over 80 percent of the biogas upgrading market overall and represent a promising alternative source of renewable methane for customers.

“In the near term, our goal is to validate this technology at scale,” Benedetti says, noting Osmoses aims to scale up its pilot projects. “It has been a big accomplishment to secure funded pilots in all of the verticals that will serve as a springboard for our next commercial phase.”

Osmoses’ other two pilot projects focus on recovering valuable gas, including helium with the Department of Energy.

“Helium is a scarce resource that we need for a variety of applications, like MRIs, and our membranes’ high performance can be used to extract small amounts of it from underground wells,” Mizrahi Rodriguez explains. “Helium is very important in the semiconductor industry to build chips and graphical processing units that are powering the AI revolution. It’s a strategic resource that the U.S. has a growing interest to produce domestically.”

Benedetti says further down the line, Osmoses’ technology could be used in carbon capture, gas “sweetening” to remove acid gases from natural gas, to separate oxygen and nitrogen, to reuse refrigerants, and more.

“There will be a progressive expansion of our capabilities and markets to deliver on our mission of redefining the backbone of the chemical, petrochemical, and energy industries,” Benedetti says. “Separations should not be a bottleneck to innovation and progress anymore.”

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 30 January 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02557-5

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) plays an important role in decarbonization pathways to meet climate goals, but some methods are land-intensive. Multimodel analysis reveals conflicts between biodiversity and CDR that are distributed unevenly, and shows that synergies are crucial to meet climate and conservation goals.

For decades, MIT Professor Ted Gibson has taught the meaning of language to first-year graduate students in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences (BCS). A new book, Gibson’s first, brings together his years of teaching and research to detail the rules of how words combine.

“Syntax: A Cognitive Approach,” released by MIT Press on Dec. 16, lays out the grammar of a language from the perspective of a cognitive scientist, outlining the components of language structure and the model of syntax that Gibson advocates: dependency grammar.

It was his research collaborator and wife, associate professor of BCS and McGovern Institute for Brain Research investigator Ev Fedorenko, who encouraged him to put pen to paper. Here, Gibson takes some time to discuss the book.

Q: Where did the process for “Syntax” begin?

A: I think it started with my teaching. Course 9.012 (Cognitive Science), which I teach with Josh Tenenbaum and Pawan Sinha, divides language into three components: sound, structure, and meaning. I work on the structure and meaning parts of language: words and how they get put together. That’s called syntax.

I’ve spent a lot of time over the last 30 years trying to understand the compositional rules of syntax, and even though there are many grammar rules in any language, I actually don’t think the form for grammar rules is that complicated. I’ve taught it in a very simple way for many years, but I’ve never written it all down in one place. My wife, Ev, is a longtime collaborator, and she suggested I write a paper. It turned into a book.

Q: How do you like to explain syntax?

A: For any sentence, for any utterance in any human language, there’s always going to be a word that serves as the head of that sentence, and every other other word will somehow depend on that headword, maybe as an immediate dependent, or further away, through some other dependent words. This is called dependency grammar; it means there’s a root word in each sentence, and dependents of that root, on down, for all the words in the sentence, form a simple tree structure. I have cognitive reasons to suggest that this model is correct, but it isn’t my model; it was first proposed in the 1950s. I adopted it because it aligns with human cognitive phenomena.

That very simple framework gives you the following observation: that longer-distance connections between words are harder to produce and understand than shorter-distance ones. This is because of limitations in human memory. The closer the words are together, the easier it is for me to produce them in a sentence, and the easier it is for you to understand them. If they’re far apart, then it’s a complicated memory problem to produce and understand them.

This gives rise to a cool observation: Languages optimize their rules in order to keep the words close together. We can have very different orders of the same elements across languages, such as the difference in word orders for English versus Japanese, where the order of the words in the English sentence “Mary eats an apple” is “Mary apple eats” in Japanese. But then the ordering rules in English and Japanese are aligned within themselves in order to minimize dependency lengths on average for the language.

Q: How does the book challenge some longstanding ideas in the field of linguistics?

A: In 1957, a book called “Syntactic Structures” by Noam Chomsky was published. It is a wonderful book that provides mathematical approaches to describe what human language is. It is very influential in the field of linguistics, and for good reason.

One of the key components of the theory that Chomsky proposed was the “transformation,” such that words and phrases can move from a deep structure to the structure that we produce. He thought it was self-evident from examples in English that transformations must be part of a human language. But then this concept of transformations eventually led him to conclude that grammar is unlearnable, that it has to be built into the human mind.  

In my view of grammar, there are no transformations. Instead, there are just two different versions of some words, or they can be underspecified for their grammar usage. The different usages may be related in meaning, and they can point to a similar meaning, but they have different dependency structures.

I think the advent of large language models suggests that language is learnable and that syntax isn’t as complicated as we used to think it was, because LLMs are successful at producing language. A large language model is almost the same as an adult speaker of a language in what it can produce. There are subtle ways in which they differ, but on the surface, they look the same in many ways, which suggests that these models do very well with learning language, even with human-like quantities of data.

I get pushback from some people who say, well, researchers can still use transformations to account for some phenomena. My reaction is: Unless you can show me that transformations are necessary, then I don’t think we need them.

Q: This book is open access. Why did you decide to publish it that way?

A: I am all for free knowledge for everyone. I am one of the editors of “Open Mind,” a journal established several years ago that is completely free and open access. I felt my book should be the same way, and MIT Press is a fantastic university press that is nonprofit and supportive of open-access publishing. It means I make less money, but it also means it can reach more people. For me, it is really about trying to get the information out there. I want more people to read it, to learn things. I think that’s how science is supposed to be.

Boston recently got its own good luck charm, “Amulet,” a 19-foot-tall tangle of organic spires installed in City Hall Plaza and embedded with the wishes, hopes, and prayers of residents from across the city.

The public artwork, by artist Rhea Vedro — also a lecturer and metals artist-in-residence in MIT’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE) — was installed on the north side of City Hall, in a newly renovated stretch of the plaza along Congress Street, in October and dedicated with a ribbon cutting on Dec. 19.

“I’m really interested in this idea of protective objects worn on the skin by humans across cultures, across time,” said Vedro at the event in the Civic Pavilion, across the plaza from the sculpture. “And then, how do you take those ideas off the body and turn them into a blown-up version — a stand-in for the body?”

Vedro started exploring that question in 2021, when she was awarded a Boston Triennial Public Art Accelerator fellowship and later commissioned by the city to create the piece — the first artwork installed in the refurbished section of the plaza. She invited people to workshops and community centers to create hundreds of “wishmarks” — steel panels with hammered indentations and words, each representing a personal wish or reflection.

The plates were later used to form the metal skin of the sculpture — three bird-like forms designed to be, in Vedro’s words, a “protective amulet for the landscape.”

“I didn’t ask anyone to share what their actual wishes were, but I met people going into surgery, people who were homeless and looking for housing, people who had just lost a loved one, people dealing with immigration issues,” Vedro said. She asked participants to meditate on the idea of a journey and safe passage. “That could be a literal journey with ideas around immigration and migration,” she said, “or it could be your own internal journey.”

Large-scale art, fine-scale detail

Vedro, who has several public artworks to her name, said in a video about making “Amulet” that the project was “the biggest thing I’ve ever done.” While artworks of this scale are often handed off to fabrication teams, she handled the construction herself, starting on her driveway until zoning rules forced her to move to her father-in-law’s warehouse. Sections were also welded at Artisans Asylum, a community workshop in Boston, where she was an artist in residence, and then moved to a large industrial studio in Rhode Island.

At the ribbon-cutting event, Vedro thanked friends, family members, and city officials who helped bring the project to life. The celebration ended with a concert by musician Veronica Robles and her mariachi band. Robles runs the Veronica Robles Cultural Center in East Boston, which served as the main site for wishmark workshops. The sculpture is expected to remain in City Hall Plaza for up to five years.

Vedro’s background is in fine arts metalsmithing, a discipline that involves shaping and manipulating metals like silver, gold, and copper through forging, casting, and soldering. She began working at a very different scale, making jewelry, and then later moved primarily to welded steel sculpture — both techniques she now teaches at MIT. When working with steel, Vedro applies the same sensitivity a jeweler brings to small objects, paying close attention to small undulations and surface texture.

She loves working with steel, Vedro says — “shaping and forming and texturing and fighting with it” — because it allows her to engage physically with the material, with her hands involved in every millimeter.

The sculpture’s fluid design began with loose, free-form bird drawings on a cement floor and rubber panels with soapstone, oil pastels, and paint sticks. Vedro then built the forms in metal, welding three-dimensional armatures from round steel bars. The organic shapes and flourishes emerged through a responsive, intuitive process.

“I’m someone who works in real-time, changing my mind and responding to the material,” Vedro says. She likens her process to making a patchwork quilt of steel pieces: forming patterns in a shapeable material like tar paper, transferring them to steel sheets, cutting and shaping and texturing the pieces, and welding them together. “So I can get lots of curvatures that way that are not at all modular.”

From steel plates to soaring form

The sculpture’s outer skin is made from thin, 20-gauge mild steel — a low-carbon steel that’s relatively soft and easy to work with — used for the wishmarks. Those plates were fitted over an internal armature constructed from heavier structural steel.

Because there were more wishmark panels than surface area, Vedro slipped some of them into the hollow space inside the sculpture before welding the piece closed. She compares them to treasures in a locket, “loose, rattling around, which freaked out the team when they were installing.” Any written text on the panels was burned off when the pieces were welded together.

“I believe the stuff’s all alchemized up into smoke, which to me is wonderful because it traverses realms just like a bird,” she says.

The surface of the sculpture is coated with a sealant — necessary because the outer skin material is prone to rust — along with spray paints, patinas, and accents including gold leaf. Its appearance will change over time, something Vedro embraces.

“The idea of transformation is actually integral to my work,” she says.

Standing outside the warmth of the Civic Pavilion on a windy, rainy day, artist Matt Bajor described the sculpture as “gorgeous,” attributing its impact in part to Vedro’s fluency in working across vastly different scales.

“The attention to detail — paying attention to the smaller things so that as it comes together as a whole, you have that fineness throughout the whole sculpture,” he said. “To do that at such a large scale is just crazy. It takes a lot of skill, a lot of effort, and a lot of time.”

Suveena Sreenilayam, a DMSE graduate student who has worked closely with Vedro, said her understanding of the relationship between art and craft brings a unique dimension to her work.

“Metal is hard to work with — and to build that on such small and large scales indicates real versatility,” Sreenilayam said. “To make something so artistic at this scale reflects her physical talent, and also her eye for detail and expression.”

Bajor said “Amulet” is a striking addition to the plaza, where the clean lines of City Hall’s Brutalist architecture contrast with the sculpture’s sinuous curves — and to Boston itself.

“I’m looking forward to seeing it in different conditions — in snow and bright sun — as the metal changes over time and as the patina develops,” he said. “It’s just a really great addition to the city.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation stands with the people of Minneapolis and with all of the communities impacted by the ongoing campaign of ICE and CBP violence. EFF will be closed Friday, Jan. 30 as part of the national shutdown in opposition to ICE and CBP and the brutality and terror they and other federal agencies continue to inflict on immigrant communities and any who stand with them.

We do not make this decision lightly, but we will not remain silent. 

• See our statement on ICE/CBP violence: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/01/eff-statement-lawless-actions-ice-and-cbp
• See our Surveillance Self-Defense tips for protestors: https://ssd.eff.org/module/attending-protest
• See our explanation of the right to record police activity: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/02/yes-you-have-right-film-ice

Through the MITx MicroMasters Program in Data, Economics, and Design of Policy, Munip Utama strengthened the skills he was already applying in his work with Baitul Enza, a nonprofit helping students in need via policy-shaping research and hands-on assistance. 

Utama’s commitment to advancing education for underprivileged students stems from his own background. His father is an elementary school teacher in a remote area and his mother has passed away. While financial hardship has always been a defining challenge, he says it has also been the driving force behind his pursuit of education. With the assistance of special programs for high-achieving students, Utama attended top schools and completed his bachelor’s degree in economics at UIN Jakarta — becoming the second person in his family to earn a university degree.

Utama joined Baitul Enza two months before graduation, through a faculty-led research project, and later became its manager, leading its programs and future development. In this interview, he describes how his experiences with the MicroMasters Program in Data, Economics, and Design of Policy (DEDP), offered by the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) and MIT Open Learning, are shaping his education, career, and personal mission.

Q: What motivated you to pursue the MITx MicroMasters Program in Data, Economics, and Design of Policy?

A: I was seeking high-quality, evidence-based courses in economics and development. I needed rigorous training in data analysis, economic reasoning, and policy design to strengthen our interventions at Baitul Enza. The MITx MicroMasters Program in Data, Economics, and Design of Policy offered exactly that: a curriculum grounded in real-world problem-solving, aligned with the challenges I face in Indonesia.

I deeply admire MIT’s commitment to transforming teaching and learning not only through innovation, but also through empathy. The DEDP program exemplifies this mission: It connects theory with practice, allowing learners like me to apply analytical tools directly to real development challenges. This approach has inspired me to adopt the same philosophy in my own teaching and mentoring, encouraging students to use data and critical thinking to solve problems in their communities.

Q: What have you gained from the MITx DEDP program? 

A: The DEDP courses have provided me with rigorous analytical and quantitative training in data analysis, economics, and policy design. They have strengthened both my research and mentorship abilities by teaching me to approach poverty and inequality through evidence-based frameworks. My experience conducting independent and collaborative research projects has informed how I mentor students, guiding them to carry out their own evidence-based research projects. I continue to seek further academic dialogue to broaden my understanding and prepare for future graduate studies.

Another key component has been the program’s financial assistance offers. Even with DEDP’s personalized income-based course pricing, financial constraints remain a significant challenge for me, and Baitul Enza operates entirely on donations and volunteer support. The scholarships administered by DEDP have been crucial in enabling me to continue my studies. It has allowed me to focus on learning without the constant burden of financial insecurity, while staying committed to my mission of breaking cycles of poverty through education. 

Q: How are you applying what you’ve learned from MIT Open Learning’s MITx programs, and how will you use what you’ve learned going forward?

A: The DEDP program has transformed how I lead Baitul Enza. I now apply data-driven and evidence-based approaches to program design, monitoring, and evaluation — enhancing cost-effectiveness and long-term impact. The program has enabled me to design case-based learning modules for students, where they analyze real-world data on poverty and education; mentor youth researchers to conduct small-scale projects using evidence-based methods; and improve program cost-effectiveness and outcome measurement to attract collaborators and government support.

Coming from a lower-middle-class family with limited access to education, MIT Open Learning has opened doors I never imagined possible. It has reaffirmed my belief that education, grounded in data and empathy, can break the cycle of poverty. The DEDP program continues to inspire me to mentor young researchers, empower disadvantaged students, and build a community rooted in evidence-based decision-making.

With the foundation built by MITx, I aim to produce policy-relevant research and scale up Baitul Enza’s impact. My long-term vision is to generate experimental evidence in Indonesia on scalable education interventions, inform national policy, and empower marginalized youth to thrive. MITx has not only prepared me academically, but has also strengthened my resolve to lead with clarity, design with evidence, and act with purpose. Beyond my own growth, MITx has multiplied its impact by empowering the next generation of students to use data and evidence in solving local development challenges.