Feed aggregator
States threaten legal fight over Trump plan to cash out offshore wind leases
Democratic support for California’s 2035 gas car ban slips, poll finds
‘Storm’ looms for aviation as EU plans to price emissions from international flights
EU bets fossil fuel lobby is crying wolf over supply shock warnings
The European Commission’s moment of climate truth
Coal mines say they cut emissions. Scientists don’t believe them.
Puerto Rico announces emergency water rationing as drought worsens
How an influx of salt may affect microbial ecosystems
As sea levels rise due to climate change, encroaching sea water will likely make freshwater environments saltier. In a new study, MIT researchers have shown how that increase in salinity might affect microbial ecosystems found in environments such as rivers and estuaries.
These microbial communities play important roles in the carbon cycle, and they also help to decompose organic matter such as algae. The MIT team found that when salt levels rise, these populations lose diversity as faster-growing strains tend to take over the community, but they maintain their overall growth rate.
“At higher salinity, you lose diversity, which is ultimately not good for an ecosystem. But what we were surprised at is that in the meantime, even though diversity decreases, the growth of the community and the production of biomass is not impacted that much,” says Jana Huisman, an MIT postdoc and the lead author of the new study.
Jeff Gore, an MIT professor of physics, is the senior author of the paper, which appears today in Nature Microbiology. Martina Dal Bello, a former MIT postdoc who is now an assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at Yale University, is also an author of the study.
Rising salt levels
Microbes that live in aquatic environments are typically adapted to thrive in fresh or salt water, or somewhere in between. Microbes that live in higher salt environments have cell walls that are optimized to resist osmotic pressure, and membrane transporters that can pump sodium ions out of the cell.
Freshwater lakes and rivers have salt concentrations around 1 gram of salt per liter of water (g/L), while oceans can reach 35 g/L. As the climate warms and sea levels rise, those oceanic waters may seep into estuaries and other inland bodies of water, increasing their salinity.
“When you think about climate change, you can think about rising temperatures, which is very common, but also a lot of other environmental stresses are going to increase,” Huisman says.
Huisman is from the Netherlands, a country with an extensive coastal delta, and she was interested in exploring how changes in salinity might affect microbial ecosystems in those aquatic habitats. The new study builds on previous work from Gore’s lab showing that higher seawater temperatures tend to favor slower-growing bacteria.
For the new study, the researchers took samples from three aquatic environments with varying salinity: the Charles River near the MIT Sailing Pavilion (4 g/L), Boston Harbor (30 g/L), and a beach in Nahant, Massachusetts (35 g/L). Each community contained hundreds of species of microbes. The researchers then grew each population in three environments of varying salinity — 16, 31, or 46 g/L.
Over two weeks, the researchers measured the communities’ growth rates and found that overall, each community maintained the same growth rate at each of the three concentrations. However, in the communities exposed to higher salt environments, the overall composition became less diverse. Further studies showed that these communities tended to be dominated by faster-growing species.
“We saw that those communities that had been propagated at higher salinity had reached a markedly different composition than the ones that lower salinity,” Huisman says.
Natural ecosystems
To explore whether their lab results might correspond to what happens in natural ecosystems, the researchers analyzed publicly available genomic data from microbes found in different aquatic ecosystems, including the Chesapeake Bay, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Baltic Sea.
For this portion of the study, the researchers focused on a genetic marker called the 16S rRNA gene copy number, which can be used as a proxy for the maximum growth rate that a species can attain. The more copies of this gene that a species has, the faster its intrinsic growth rate.
The researchers found that in these natural communities, environments with higher salinity also tended to be dominated by faster-growing species.
“When we first saw that, it was very exciting — that, indeed, what we found in the lab seems to also be represented in data from natural communities, sampled across a range of different environments,” Huisman says. “You see the same signatures in such data, and that’s highly suggestive that what we found in the lab might also be true in natural environments.”
One potential drawback to this loss of diversity is a reduction in microbial populations’ ability to withstand other types of environmental stress, the researchers say.
In this study, the researchers did not investigate the functions of the individual bacterial strains that ended up becoming more prevalent. Some of them may play beneficial roles, but it’s also possible that some of them might be pathogenic strains.
“Whether you want faster-growing species to take over or not might also be related to what the identity of those species is. That is something that I’m interested in looking at in the future,” Huisman says.
The research was funded by a Human Frontier Science Program Fellowship and a Schmidt Science Polymath Award.
Diana Grass: Listening to the body’s language
Growing up in Colombia, Diana Grass had a simple response whenever someone told her something was impossible.
“I’ll figure it out.”
It’s a phrase that she still lives by today as PhD candidate in the Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology (HST), as she develops soft bioelectronic devices to study the physiological signals through which the brain and body communicate.
“I’ve always been fascinated by one question: How do complex systems work?” Grass says.
An instinct to get to the bottom of things has guided Grass’ unconventional academic journey across continents and disciplines. Before becoming a neuroscientist and engineer, Grass studied philology and education to understand how language evolves, preserves knowledge, and shapes human communication. Looking back, she sees a common thread. “I wasn’t just studying language,” she says. “I was learning how complex systems communicate.”
But it wasn’t until she moved to the United States and began working as a medical interpreter that her scientific interests took a new direction.
“Every day, I translated conversations between physicians and patients with neurological disorders,” she says. “Watching those interactions sparked a fascination with the brain. I was intrigued by how a single organ could shape how we communicate, and ultimately who we are.”
Working alongside clinicians, Grass watched them rely on laboratory tests, medical imaging, and vital signs to understand what was happening inside the body. Despite remarkable advances in medical imaging and diagnostics, clinicians still rely largely on isolated snapshots of biological processes that are continuously changing inside the body.
“The body is communicating all the time,” she says. “We still lack the tools to understand its language.”
Determined to better understand the brain, Grass returned to school to study neuroscience with a minor in pre-medicine. She joined an immunology laboratory at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, where she investigated neuroimmune communication and gained a new appreciation for the body’s interconnected physiology.
“Until then, I had been fascinated by the brain,” she says. “My work in immunology made me realize that the nervous system doesn’t function in isolation,” she says. “It continuously communicates with the immune system and peripheral organs to coordinate physiology and maintain homeostasis. To understand health and disease, we have to understand how those interactions preserve or disrupt that balance.”
That realization transformed her scientific focus from understanding the brain to understanding how the nervous system coordinates physiology through continuous communication with the rest of the body, beginning with the immune system.
The complexity of that question ultimately brought Grass to pursue a PhD in medical engineering and medical physics with the HST program. She works in the Bioelectronics Group, led by Polina Anikeeva, the Matoula S. Salapatas Professor and head of MIT’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Grass also uses facilities in the T.J. Rodgers Laboratory and MIT.nano, and is part of the K. Lisa Yang Brain Body Center.
Today, Grass develops soft bioelectronic devices that integrate seamlessly with soft peripheral tissues without damaging them, to continuously monitor multiple physiological signals while enabling electrical recording and stimulation of neural circuits. These technologies provide a new way to investigate how neural communication coordinates physiology across the entire body. This knowledge could enable earlier diagnosis, more precise therapies, and a new generation of bioelectronic medicine.
For Grass, the work has taken on an even deeper significance since becoming a mother. Grass has two school-age children and for her, the possibility of developing technologies that help detect disease earlier and personalize treatments isn’t just a scientific goal; it’s one she hopes will shape the future of medicine for the next generation.
“I want to contribute to a future where medicine understands the body physiology well enough to predict disease instead of simply reacting to it, personalize therapies with greater precision, and ultimately give families more healthy years together,” she says. “Because once you become a parent, every scientific question becomes deeply human.”
The complexity of Grass’ research has required her to step well beyond her original training. After studying neuroscience and immunology, she immersed herself in materials science, systems physiology, device fabrication, bioelectronics, and surgery to develop the tools needed to answer fundamental biological questions.
“The scientific question was bigger than any one discipline,” she says. “HST taught me to begin with biology, not disciplines. Once you understand the biological principles, medicine, engineering, and science stop being separate fields. They become complementary ways of answering the same question.”
The constant need to learn a new discipline has been both the most rewarding and challenging part of Grass’ research so far.
“Every time I crossed into a new discipline, I felt like an immigrant again,” she says. “I had to learn a new language, understand a new culture, and earn the trust of people who had spent their careers there.”
Grass’ passion for understanding cultures extends well beyond the lab. Soon after arriving at MIT, she co-founded the Graduate First-Generation Low-Income Student Group to create a supportive space for students and connect them with the resources they need to thrive. What began as a small initiative has grown into a community of more than 300 graduate students representing over 60 countries, connecting students with faculty, alumni, entrepreneurs, and industry leaders.
“It has been really rewarding to see new GFLI leaders emerge and continue this legacy,” Grass says.
As an avid traveler, Grass’ favorite pastime is exploring new cultures, whether that be through learning a new traditional recipe or a new language. She speaks four languages fluently and can say “thank you” in roughly 50 more.
Whether she’s cooking Thai food with her children or introducing friends to recipes from around the world, she sees food as another language capable of connecting people across cultures. That same philosophy shapes how she thinks about science.
“I’ve realized that every culture has its own language and every scientific discipline its own way of understanding the world,” she says. “Looking back, every stage of my life has been about understanding how complex systems communicate. Today, my goal is to help medicine understand the principles that govern communication across the human body in health and disease.”
Win–wins for wind and whales
Nature Climate Change, Published online: 17 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02705-x
Offshore wind development presents huge potential for climate change mitigation, but loud underwater noises produced during construction can negatively impact marine species. Recent research shows that careful planning and noise-reduction technologies can effectively reduce impacts on critically endangered North Atlantic right whales at relatively minor additional cost.Tropical forest restoration can offset water flux losses from deforestation but not everywhere
Nature Climate Change, Published online: 17 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02710-0
Tropical forest restoration is widely promoted as a nature-based climate solution, but its potential to restore hydrological functions impaired by deforestation remains unclear. Now, satellite observations show that forest gain can increase evapotranspiration and precipitation more than forest loss reduces them, with prominent asymmetry in South America and Africa.Balancing marine species conservation with cost-effective renewable energy development
Nature Climate Change, Published online: 17 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02696-9
The authors consider the potential conflict between renewable energy development (offshore wind) and wildlife (North Atlantic right whales, Eubalaena glacialis). They demonstrate a framework to identify trade-offs under different scenarios, maximizing conservation with minimal financial burden.Intercity connectivity enhances urban mobility resilience to extreme rainfall
Nature Climate Change, Published online: 17 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02713-x
Growing extreme weather poses escalating threats to urban functionality. This study shows that higher network centrality and stronger ties to wealthier cities enhance intracity mobility resilience during extreme rainfall, with larger benefits for smaller and poorer cities from targeted investment.Protecting Privacy in an AI Era
Daniel Solove argues in the Wall Street Journal (alternate link) that giving people control of their personal data is not an effective way to regulate privacy in this era. Instead, we need to hold companies accountable for their actions, similar to what we do with food and drug companies. Measures such as rigorous data minimization, fiduciary duties, liability for negligent or reckless technological design, liability for algorithms that cause harm, and multi-stakeholder review of technologies will be far more effective.
