The same overheating problem that happens to our laptops also plagues computer servers and data centers around the world — and heat management is only getting harder as computer chips get more compact and powerful.

Understanding how heat moves through chips at the micro scale is essential for continuing to improve their performance. Unfortunately, most methods for measuring heat flow struggle with multilayered devices like the electronics that power our modern world.

Now MIT researchers have demonstrated a new way to study how heat moves through multilayered materials, combining X-rays that penetrate multiple layers with laser pulses for delivering heat. The researchers used the technique to measure how heat moves inside a promising device for transistors and flexible electronics. 

The method was so precise it allowed the researchers to quantify the effect of a single micron-scale defect in the device, revealing a surprising fourfold reduction in the material’s ability to transfer heat at that spot. They also found that the defect caused heat to spread unevenly, moving more easily in one direction than in the other.

The team believes the approach could help researchers understand overheating in devices and help companies develop more power-dense electronics for everything from AI applications to wearables and clean energy systems.

“Chip developers need devices that can handle heat,” says Mingda Li, an associate professor of nuclear science and engineering at MIT and co-corresponding author on an open-access paper about the work in Nature Communications. “I think overheating has become the real bottleneck in device performance. When doing these diagnoses using traditional techniques, they couldn’t get down to the micro- or nanometer scale. But eventually they’d like to go beyond that to study the heat carriers and understand exactly what causes failure, in order to avoid local hotspots and design better devices. This approach is a step in that direction.”

Joining Li on the paper are co-lead authors Thanh Nguyen PhD ’24 and MIT postdoc Chuliang Fu; PhD candidate Mouyang Cheng; Abhijatmedhi Chotrattanapituk ’21, SM ’26; Denisse Córdova Carrizales SM ’26; Eunbi Rha SM ’26; Tyra Espedal ’26; Buxuan Li PhD ’24; Shivam Kajale SM ’23, PhD ’26; Tongtong Liu PhD ’23; Kuan Qiao PhD ’22; University of Texas at Austin Assistant Professor Zhantao Chen SM ’18, PhD ’22; Argonne National Laboratory researchers Kumar Neeraj, Donald Walko, and Haidan Wen; MIT Principal Research Scientist Svetlana Boriskina; MIT Associate Professor Deblina Sarkar; and co-corresponding author and MIT Associate Professor Jeehwan Kim.

Tracking heat

Making more powerful computers and electronics often comes down to cramming more transistors into a smaller area. But the closer those transistors get to each other, the hotter the device gets as it operates, and the more heat needs to be moved.

Most people learn about the problem from their laptops overheating on their lap. At the data center scale, it means an enormous amount of energy must be devoted to cooling the servers.

The quest to design more power-dense computers and electronics is thus a quest to find materials that can transport heat most efficiently.

Researchers have used a number of methods to measure and model heat flow across materials, but they all have limitations when it comes to studying realistic device architectures. One common optical method to study heat at the microscopic level, for instance, is called time domain thermal reflectance.

“Because that technique uses optics, it doesn’t allow you to study different layers,” Kim explains. “Real devices have five or more layers. It also only provides an overall signal, and that makes it hard to see thermal transport happening in layers buried under the surface.”

Other techniques, like infrared cameras, don’t capture tiny changes at a fast enough frame rate to be useful at small scales.

To address those limitations, the researchers wanted to create something that could measure heat transfer at the nanoscale in multilayer systems. To do that, they used an emerging analysis technique that sends electron pulses and ultrafast X-rays at a material and measures changes in energy.

“Over the last few years, researchers have developed what is basically the brightest X-ray source in the world,” Nguyen says. “That allows you to focus an X-ray beam and get incredibly fine spatial resolution. You can also use a laser to heat the sample while the X-ray scans and shows how the heat dissipates across space in real-time.”

The technique offered a better view of heat transfer because the laser-powered electron pulse can capture changes in material strain at the atomic level while the X-rays can penetrate into multiple layers of the material, and the measurements can be combined to provide a clearer view of how a material moves heat.

“Using previous measurement techniques, in real devices, you couldn’t resolve what happens on one layer versus another, so you’d just measure the average,” Fu says. “X-rays can clearly show how heat propagates across the interface through their diffraction.”

The researchers applied their technique to a test device made of a layer of gallium nitride, which has shown promise for conducting heat efficiently, on top of silicon. The material combination has been studied for years, but its thermal performance has been shown to deteriorate because of tiny defects created during processing.

The researchers measured a fourfold reduction in heat dissipation across a wrinkle defect on the device and a 25 percent drop in heat dissipation across materials, showing more disruption to heat flow than they had expected.

“When people model heat dissipation, they model perfect crystals without defects,” Li says. “But these types of large wrinkle defects are very common in 2D materials. People never even knew how much heat is blocked by these wrinkles. Those are things we can now directly observe with this technique.”

Designing better chips

Li says a leading semiconductor industry consortium has already reached out to collaborate on applying the measurement technique to study different types of chips. He believes the technique will work to study a wide array of materials and devices.

“We can now pass a current and shine an X-ray on a device and see how the heat dissipates at a very small scale,” Kim says. “That’s something the industry has been longing for.”

Li says the approach will provide researchers with new information to improve the design of electronic systems.

“This will enable better thermal design of electronic systems,” Kim says. “Even with the same type of materials, the geometry and how the materials are laid out is quite complicated, so it will show us how those differences impact thermal flow by providing direct experimental measurements.”

The work was supported, in part, by the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. National Science Foundation, and the MIT School of Engineering Distinguished Energy Efficiency Fellowship.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 06 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02726-6

The authors integrate dendrochronological records with range shifts to show that shifts in montane tree species are tightly linked to tree hydraulic properties. While climate-sensitive species track warming to higher elevations, stress-resistant species expand downslope.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 06 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02715-9

Changes in the Earth system may persist long after atmospheric CO2 levels decline. This study examines ocean acidification and how it will persist in ocean regions globally, with the Arctic identified as the area that experiences relief from acidification the latest under negative emissions.

On July 26, 1951, the U.S. Air Force, Army, and Navy signed a charter establishing Project Lincoln, an R&D program managed by MIT to develop the nation's first continent-wide air defense system, SAGE. The charter called for a research center to be opened within the towns of Bedford, Lincoln, and Lexington, Massachusetts, to support Project Lincoln, which was subsequently renamed MIT Lincoln Laboratory.

Seventy-five years later, Lincoln Laboratory — operating as a U.S. Department of War (DoW) federally funded research and development center managed by MIT — continues to innovate technology solutions to pressing national security challenges in partnership with government, industry, and academia. These innovations have at once protected the war fighter and U.S. homeland while impacting society. 

To commemorate the lab’s 75th anniversary, 10 staff members reflect below on key technology impacts. Additional technology impacts, both past and present, are featured on the laboratory’s historical timeline and in its 2025 Impact Report.

Surveilling space

“Since the dawn of the Space Age, Lincoln Laboratory has developed, prototyped, and/or operated essentially all radar and optical systems that the nation uses to surveil space. From detecting Sputnik in 1957 and conducting the first space-based tracking of satellites in 1997 to discovering more than 50 percent of then-known natural objects in the solar system by the early 2000s, these innovations have not only provided space situational awareness for the military but also advanced science.”

—Grant Stokes, laboratory fellow in the Space Systems and Technology Division

Trailblazing military satellite communications (MILSATCOM)

“Today, MILSATCOM is an expectation, used in almost every mission. But when we began the Lincoln Experimental Satellites program in the 1960s, only the glimmer of an idea existed. The laboratory brought this concept into fruition, developing a series of prototypes and then supporting industry as they built multiple generations of operational capabilities. The laboratory continues to provide assessments, test infrastructure, and advanced technologies for ensuring warfighters remain connected globally now and into the future.”

—Tom Macdonald, head of the Communication Systems Division

Advancing capability at a national test range

“For 64 of the laboratory’s 75 years, our staff, accompanied by their families, have been serving the Ronald Reagan Space and Missile Test Range on Kwajalein Atoll in the Pacific. As the range’s scientific advisor, we have helped envision, build, operate, and enhance instrumentation critical to missile defense and space situational awareness. With our technical support, this national asset hosts stakeholders across the DoW developing and demonstrating advanced technologies to keep us ahead of adversaries.” 

—Katherine Rink, head of the Air, Missile, and Maritime Defense Technology Division

Protecting air travelers

“Aviation safety around the world has improved tremendously thanks to technologies developed at Lincoln Laboratory. Advanced surveillance and collision-avoidance systems pioneered here were critical to keep aircraft safely separated as traffic levels increased. Laboratory innovations in radar processing and weather forecasting now help controllers guide flights smoothly around storms. Today, we are excited to be designing novel technologies for drones and advanced air mobility systems that will revolutionize air transportation over the next 75 years.” 

—James Kuchar, associate head of the Homeland Protection and Air Traffic Control Division

Miniaturizing microelectronics

“All electronic devices, from smartphones to laptops, rely on ever-shrinking transistors. The laboratory’s pioneering work in 193-nanometer lithography and liquid-immersion lithography enabled chip manufacturers to continue this miniaturization from 2000 onward. For nearly two decades, we had served as the international center of excellence for developing these technologies. The semiconductor industry adopted them worldwide, impacting virtually every aspect of modern life. We continue innovating techniques to fit more transistors on chips powering our digital age.”

—Mordechai Rothschild, principal staff member in the Advanced Technology Division

Saving lives on the front lines

“During operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom, Lincoln Laboratory’s work countering improvised explosive devices helped shift the fight from reacting to roadside bombs to anticipating, detecting, and defeating them. We quickly prototyped, integrated, and fielded several advanced surveillance and sensing systems that reduced casualties and improved freedom of maneuver. This approach — combining rapid innovation with rapid transition to the field — continues to strengthen national security and save lives as we confront today’s newest battlefield challenges.”

—Justin Brooke, Lincoln Laboratory assistant director for research and development

Providing actionable intelligence

“How do you find targets hidden in plain sight? The laboratory has been addressing this question for decades. We've developed airborne 3D lidar systems to image beneath triple-canopy jungle, ground-penetrating radar and opto-acoustic systems to locate buried mines, techniques exploiting molecular vibration at terahertz frequencies to identify trace-explosives residue, and airborne synthetic aperture radar systems to map vast areas and pinpoint objects of interest. These technologies have enhanced the effectiveness of U.S. military missions globally.”

—Jalal Khan, assistant head of the ISR and Tactical Systems Division

Beaming data over lasers

“In 2013, the laboratory and NASA made history by transmitting data from the moon to Earth at record-breaking speeds using lasers instead of traditional radio. This laser communications demonstration incorporated decades of laboratory engineering innovation and paved the way for future missions. The same technology was used recently to connect the world with the Artemis II astronauts, enabling near-continuous transmission of awe-inspiring high-definition images and videos — forever shaping how we communicate across the solar system.” 

—Bryan Robinson, leader of the Optical and Quantum Communications Group

Detecting biological threats

“Biological threats, whether from weaponized agents like anthrax or infectious diseases like Covid-19, pose significant risks to national security. For three decades, the laboratory has advanced technologies that strengthen the nation’s ability to detect, prevent, and respond to such threats. Our innovations in environmental biosensing and presymptomatic detection of infection enhance public health resilience and protect infrastructure. For war fighters, these technologies provide improved health monitoring and threat awareness to maintain operational readiness in complex environments.”

—Christina Rudzinski, assistant head of the Biotechnology and Human Systems Division

Securing cyber systems

“The greatest reward of our cybersecurity work is not the research we publish or technologies we create — it is the impact we’ve delivered to the men and women on the front lines using our technology. By understanding the threats, strengthening resilience, and delivering new capabilities to confront our adversaries, we have helped secure the nation. Our innovations have not only supported the DoW and intelligence community but also advanced the world of computing and security research.”

—Stephen Rejto, head of the Cyber Security and Information Sciences Division

Looking forward

“Our founding charter called upon MIT to solve an urgent national security crisis. That mission still drives us 75 years later. Lincoln Laboratory’s technological innovations have defended the homeland from emerging threats, enhanced war fighter operations on the modern battlefield, protected the public from natural and deliberate hazards, and enhanced daily life. Across air, land, sea, space, and cyber, we are advancing technologies and prototyping complex systems to help safeguard the nation for decades to come.” 

—Melissa Choi, Lincoln Laboratory director

Super-thin superconducting materials, which are only one or a few atoms thick, have unique properties scientists can leverage to produce more compact, scalable, and efficient quantum devices. But these fragile materials degrade so rapidly in air that they are difficult to study or manufacture.

Now, researchers from MIT and elsewhere have discovered and harnessed a method to generate a large, uniform area of ultrathin superconducting material that remains stable in air. 

They “grow” the superconducting material, called niobium diselenide, underneath another atomically thin material, carbon-based graphene. The graphene layer protects the fragile superconductor from oxidation, while guiding it to grow in a smooth layer over a large wafer-scale area.

The researchers further integrated this air-stable superconductor into a superconducting microwave circuit. When tested, the material maintained its superconducting properties and exhibited high kinetic inductance, which is a resource for many quantum devices. 

In the long run, this advance could help miniaturize superconducting quantum computing hardware, as well as technologies like ultrasensitive quantum detectors for communications or cosmology.

“Emerging superconductors that are only a monolayer thick have a lot of potential. Thanks to our new process, they are no longer materials that can only be made at a very small scale. There are now exciting opportunities for scientists to study these materials, utilize them in circuits, and explore their practical applications,” says co-lead author Xudong Sheldon Zheng, a graduate student in the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS).

He is joined on the paper by co-lead authors Sameia Zaman SM ’24, an EECS graduate student, and Kenan Zhang, a recent postdoc in the MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE); corresponding authors William D. Oliver, the Henry Ellis Warren (1894) Professor of EECS and professor of physics, director of the Center for Quantum Engineering, and associate director of RLE; Joel Î-j. Wang, an assistant professor at New York University; and Jing Kong, the Jerry Mcafee (1940) Professor in Engineering at MIT and a member of RLE; as well as others at MIT and Lincoln Laboratory, Rice University, Yale University, and Pohang University in South Korea. The research appears today in Nature.

Powerful properties

Superconductors are materials that can conduct electricity without resistance, and they are essential for some types of quantum devices. 

Two-dimensional superconducting materials retain their superconducting properties despite being only a few atoms thick. These materials hold the promise to miniaturize superconducting circuitry.

Niobium diselenide, an ultrathin superconductor composed of a single, closely packed layer of niobium atoms sandwiched between a single layer of selenium atoms on either side, has a very high kinetic inductance, as members of the research team recently reported.

This enables the material to store a great deal of inductive energy in a very small area. Large kinetic inductance in a small form-factor is a desirable design element in many quantum devices. 

One commonly used approach to realizing a large kinetic inductance is to string together an array of devices called Josephson junctions.

If scientists could incorporate materials such as thin niobium diselenide with sufficiently large kinetic inductance into a quantum circuit, they could replace the large area of electronic junctions with a tiny piece of thin-film material, making the circuit more compact. But because niobium diselenide degrades rapidly in air, scientists have not been able to reliably fabricate devices at the wafer scale. Instead, they rely on exfoliation techniques that yield small flakes. Furthermore, researchers have struggled to grow material with uniform monolayer thickness. Consequently, it has been challenging to fully probe its properties or test it in practical applications.

“Typically, once we make the material and remove it from its inert environment, it immediately starts to oxidize and degrade, ultimately becoming damaged,” Zheng explains.

Scientists usually grow niobium diselenide by depositing chemical precursors onto a silicon dioxide substrate. Then they place another layer of two-dimensional material, like graphene or hexagonal boron nitride, on top to protect the fragile superconductor from air.

But such postgrowth protection presents a challenge. The superconductor begins to oxidize almost immediately after synthesis, degrading its properties before it is protected. Meanwhile, the protection process requires a stringent inert environment and delicate processing.

Mind the gap

The MIT researchers used a different tactic. They put the layer of graphene on top of the silicon dioxide substrate first. Then they deposited the precursors and grew the superconducting material in the tiny gap between the two layers.

“It took a long time for us to understand how the growth could happen underneath the graphene. Through collaboration and discussion, we eventually uncovered the mechanism for growing the material at the interface, and this solves a lot of problems and allows us to simplify our fabrication steps,” Zheng says.

The silicon dioxide substrate helps trap the precursors long enough for the crystal to begin forming, while the graphene layer allows them to move around easily and spread into a continuous monolayer.

The researchers used this technique to generate a perfectly smooth layer of niobium diselenide more than an inch in size.

“By carefully tuning the growth conditions, we can ensure the material grows between the layers in exactly the way we’ve designed,” Zheng says.

Even though the graphene is placed on top of the silicon dioxide, the weak adhesion between these materials leaves a gap between them less than 1 nanometer thick. The niobium diselenide grows only within that gap. Then, since it is already encapsulated by graphene, the researchers can safely remove it into the ambient environment without causing degradation.

Careful connections

The researchers also designed an oxidation-free transfer technique to peel the graphene-niobium diselenide structure from its growth substrate, building on prior work by members of the team.

Then, they developed a method to integrate the thin film into a quantum circuit without hampering the fragile superconductor or its properties.

“It is challenging to make a good electrical connection between this very thin material, which is only about 1 nanometer in thickness, and our electrodes, which are a few hundred nanometers in thickness,” Zaman says.

They carefully etch the side walls of the thin-film superconductor in a vacuum chamber, which preserves the smooth edge of the material. When they integrate the prepared niobium-graphene structure into a conventional superconducting circuit, it forms a reliable electrical connection. Importantly, the material maintained its superconducting properties and exhibited high kinetic inductance after clean room fabrication and integration into the circuit. This makes it particularly attractive for fabricating compact superconducting quantum devices and other quantum technologies.

Furthermore, the growth strategy is not limited to monolayer niobium diselenide. The researchers demonstrated that it can be extended to a broad family of monolayer quantum materials with diverse and technologically important properties.

In the future, the researchers aim to integrate these ultrathin superconducting materials into functional device architectures to enable the exploration of fundamental physics and the prototyping of quantum devices and other advanced technologies.

“We’ve taken a very good step toward exploring both the physics and the application side of this thin, monolayer superconductor, which we can now grow in wafer scale or in even larger areas. There are a lot of directions we can go in the future,” Zaman says.

This research was funded, in part, by the U.S. Army Research Office, the U.S. National Science Foundation, the Schlumberger Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Semiconductor Research Corporation Center, the MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, and the National Research Foundation of Korea. This work was carried out, in part, using MIT.nano facilities.

To develop new targeted treatments for cancer, scientists need tissue models that accurately represent the genetic and molecular traits of the cancer they’re studying. An international team led by researchers at MIT’s Koch Institute, the Broad Institute, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, the National Cancer Institute, and numerous other partnering institutions has developed nearly 700 new cancer models, derived from patient tumors, which they hope will aid in drug development. 

These cells, which represent 25 different types of cancer, are now available for cancer researchers around the world to use. The project is described in a new paper appearing today in Nature, with contributors from more than two dozen institutions.

The models are the result of a 10-year initiative, funded by the National Cancer Institute, to expand the number of patient-derived tissue models available. For most of these models, the researchers converted tumor cells into organoids — 3D cell cultures that can survive indefinitely and mimic the genetic and molecular features of the tumors that they originally came from.

This type of model could help researchers identify new drug targets and test potential new treatments for many more types of cancer.

“Since the sequencing of the human genome and the analysis of cancer genomes over the last 20 years, we have had many ideas about cancer targets, but we need experimental systems in the lab to validate those targets and launch drug discovery projects,” says Jesse Boehm, a research scientist at the Koch Institute and one of the senior authors of the study.

From tumors to organoids

The Human Cancer Models Initiative was launched in 2016, following the completion of the Cancer Genome Atlas, an effort to catalog the genomic alterations responsible for cancer growth. 

For the atlas project, researchers sequenced cancer cell samples from thousands of patients. That work revealed that the diversity of tumor genetic profiles was not fully captured by the roughly 1,000 patient-derived cancer cell lines that existed at the time.

“We realized that a thousand wasn’t enough, that the international community needed to invest in many more thousands to represent all cancers, all genotypes, all ethnicities,” Boehm says. “Most existing models come from European and Southeast Asian patients, and many rare cancers are missing.”

Funded by the National Cancer Institute and the United Kingdom’s Wellcome Trust, hundreds of scientists across dozens of institutions participated in obtaining patient samples and developing them into cell lines that could be used for research.

“It’s been an enormous initiative, and this Nature paper is the culmination of that 10-year swath of activity,” Boehm says.

More than 2,700 tumor samples were obtained from hospitals participating in the study, from patients who gave their permission for their cells to be used for research. These samples were collected by hospitals in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. 

“A resource of this scale depends on the kind of systematic effort that often happens behind the scenes,” says Mushriq Al-Jazrawe, scientific director of the High Throughput Sciences (HTS) platform at the Koch Institute and one of the lead authors of the study. “I’m especially grateful to the technical and scientific teams across the participating institutes whose careful, expert work turns patient tumor samples into well-characterized models and data that researchers everywhere can use with confidence.”

Most of these samples came from commonly seen cancers such as lung, liver, and pancreatic, but they also included about 150 rare types including tumors of the gallbladder and the small intestine.

To convert these samples into cells that can survive indefinitely in the lab, the researchers developed techniques for culturing the cells in specialized growth media with a scaffold that helps them grow into a 3D structure. Overall, the researchers were able to successfully convert about one-third of the patient samples that they received.

Most of these new models consist of organoids, which in some cases more closely mimic the structure of the tissue that the cells came from. Traditional cancer cell lines, which were developed beginning in the 1950s, exist as single layers of cells grown in a lab dish, while organoids consist of three-dimensional balls of cells embedded in a gelatin-like structure.

Once the organoids and cell lines were established, which can take up to a year, the researchers analyzed them to make sure that their genomic sequences, RNA expression, and epigenomic modifications closely matched those of the tumor cells that they were derived from.

Cancer vulnerabilities

All of the models developed as part of the HCMI were deposited at the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), a nonprofit distributor of cell lines. Each model also has extensive data from the patient whose cells were used to start the cell line, including mutations that the patient inherited from their parents (germline mutations), and information on the cancer treatments they received.

Using these models, scientists should be able to perform much larger scale screens that could aid in drug development efforts. 

In another paper also appearing in Nature today, Broad Institute researchers reported that they were able to profile more than 300 of the new models using high-throughput genome-sequencing, RNA sequencing, and more than 100 with CRISPR loss-of-function screens. This enabled them to identify vulnerabilities in each model that could be targeted with new drugs.

These findings have been added to a resource known as the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap), which now includes information on more than 2,000 types of cancer.

In another Nature companion paper, researchers at the Sanger Institute led an effort to characterize an additional 256 organoids developed through the HCMI project. 

Additionally, even though most aspects of the formal HCMI project are currently winding down, researchers hope to continue developing models derived from additional patient tumor samples, including more pediatric cancers and rare cancers.

“We now have about 2,000, but if we really want to represent all humans with cancer in our preclinical research, more work is needed. We have to invite patients to donate tissue to make research tools that the whole world can use,” Boehm says. “I think this will hopefully be not the end, but the beginning.”

“A major opportunity now is to carry the lessons of HCMI forward, so we can generate as much insight as possible from these precious tissue donations,” says Al-Jazrawe, who is also a researcher in the Broad Institute’s Cancer Program. “Here at HTS, we are continuing the work by developing methods to study patient-derived samples and models reproducibly and at scale, and by providing a platform for close collaboration with clinical and research teams.”

Other senior authors of the HCMI paper are Mathew Garnett of the Wellcome Sanger Institute, David Tuveson of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Andrea Califano of Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Paul Spellman of the University of California at Los Angeles, Keith Ligon of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Daniela Gerhard of the NCI Center for Cancer Genomics, and Louis Staudt of the NCI Center for Cancer Research.

In addition to Al-Jazrawe, the paper’s lead authors are Dina El-Harouni of the Broad Institute and Dana Farber, Seongmin Choi of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Merve Dede of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Toshinori Hinoue of the Van Andel Institute, Sean Misek of the Broad Institute and Dana-Farber, Heeju Hoh of the Institute of Systems Biology and the Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Luca Zanella of the Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons. 

The research was funded primarily by the National Cancer Institute and the Wellcome Trust.

An appeals court ruling unfreezing the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund could be the big break for efforts to bring clean energy to communities around the country — or just the latest turn of the legal screw.

The three wildfires near Spokane have so far burned far fewer acres than other ongoing Washington fires. But they have wrought outsize destruction.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers discussed ways of advancing a host of legislation.

The Government Accountability Office says the disaster agency is at risk of failure and operates "in uncertainty and confusion."

The shark is far more common in warmer, southern waters such as the Caribbean Sea.

The Danube’s record-low water levels also have forced power plants to the brink of shutting down.

“The goal is for the day to end better than it started,” said the head of the Greek Firefighters Association.

The cleared land was later converted into pasture for commercial use, investigators said.

This is disturbing:

…a team of security researchers at UC San Diego, who found that a model of aftermarket car alarm known as the KARR Security System, installed in more than 2 million vehicles across the US by their estimate, can let any hacker within Bluetooth range send radio commands to silently unlock the car at will, turn off its alarm, honk the car’s horn or flash its lights, or even disable its ignition and leave a driver stranded.

Imagine a bottle of hazardous chemicals sitting on a laboratory shelf that changes its appearance to alert scientists that its lid is not properly secured, potentially preventing a dangerous spill.

A new 3D-printing system created by MIT researchers enables users to produce interactive objects like this chemical bottle, which change their appearance when they are pressed, slid, or turned, without the use of any internal electronics. 

Their system simplifies the process of designing and fabricating 3D objects with mechanically switchable surface appearances, enabling individuals without technical expertise to quickly generate dynamic everyday objects.

The design and fabrication system combines specially arranged optical layers with built-in mechanical parts so a single object can display different images or patterns. The resulting objects change appearance based on user interactions like screwing on a lid or flipping a switch, and they can be manufactured in one pass on a multimaterial 3D printer.

The system can be used to fabricate a range of interactive objects that don’t require fragile electronic circuits, such as adaptable warning signs that could withstand foul weather or dynamic packaging that alerts users if fasteners came loose during shipping. 

The end-to-end system could also streamline rapid prototyping of adaptable objects for artistic, architectural, and engineering applications.

“With our system, an object can tell you whether you are using it properly, without the need for sensors or any complicated electronics. The interactive display is mechanical, so you can create a self-contained, multistate, interactive device that a user can control very intuitively,” says Yunyi Zhu, a graduate student in the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) and lead author of a paper on this platform.

Her co-authors include Dingning Cao, an MIT undergraduate; Jeremy Mrzyglocki, a graduate student at the Technical University of Munich; Stefanie Mueller, an associate professor in EECS and the Department of Mechanical Engineering at MIT and a member of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL); and Narjes Pourjafarian, a postdoc at Northeastern University. The research will be presented at the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology.

Mechanically switchable surfaces

Many interactive products rely on screens and electronics to change their appearance. But if these dynamic objects are exposed to water or harsh chemicals, or are squished, twisted, or pressed with great force, the fragile electronics could be damaged.

On the other hand, conventional methods that use surface optics to change an object’s appearance without electronics typically utilize static labels like stickers or curved lenses to create different visual effects based on where the user is looking, limiting interactivity.

To simplify the process of making dynamic, interactive objects that don’t require electronics, the MIT researchers developed a system that automatically converts a user’s design into a 3D printer-ready model of an object with a mechanically switchable surface appearance.   

Their design, ShiftLens, creates switchable appearances by combining two optical layers on an object’s surface. It places a layer of special lenses over an underlying, patterned backplane. 

The object displays different visual states based on the motion between the two layers. 

The lens layer contains an array of tiny lenticular lenses, curved lenses which steer light differently depending on the viewing angle of the user. The pattern layer contains strips of images that correspond to multiple appearances of the object surface.

When the user shifts the lens layer, different parts of the backplane come into view. The lenses magnify these parts of the backplane image, changing the surface appearance.

“The biggest challenge in this project was to make sure all moving parts align. We need to make sure that the optical effect, mechanical linkages, and computational graphics align with one another,” Zhu says.

A straightforward system

To simplify the design process, the researchers created a user-friendly tool that does all this work behind the scenes. 

It automatically generates a ShiftLens structure based on a few inputs, including images of the visual states the user wants to achieve and the desired shape and curves of the object.

“Another challenge is to communicate to users who are not familiar with optics or mechanical structures and let them specify and achieve what they have in mind,” she says.

The researchers thought carefully about how to communicate the limitations of the ShiftLens design tool to the user. For instance, ShiftLens is not compatible with all objects, since it requires a shifting motion to enable interaction between the two layers.

Users can either incorporate a ShiftLens into the design of an object that has this type of interaction built-in, like the rotation of a lipstick tube, or integrate an actuation mechanism like a switch, knob, or roller. 

“With ShiftLens, users can control what an object looks like while they are using it,” she says.

The researchers showcased how someone might use ShiftLens by fabricating a range of interactive objects.

In one experiment, they created a chemical bottle that turns green and displays a check mark when the cap is securely tightened, but turns red and displays an exclamation mark when it is loose. For another demonstration, they fabricated a tic-tac-toe game with squares that can display a red X, a blue O, or no letter, depending on which direction a user turns a knob.

While the ShiftLens tool is designed to simplify the fabrication process for makers, the techniques could be scaled up for commercial and industrial applications, Zhu says. For instance, it could be used to design piping that can change its appearance to identify a damaged connection that is causing a leak.

“The leaking sink in my apartment would be a lot easier to fix if it could tell me where the leak was coming from,” Zhu adds.

The researchers want to explore additional applications in future work. They also plan to develop an algorithm that can generate a ShiftLens structure with fewer user inputs, simplifying the design process. In addition, they plan to enhance the design tool so users can incorporate a wider variety of actuation mechanisms.

The Senate Commerce Committee will vote this week on several censorious and privacy invasive bills: KOSA, the SCREEN Act, Youth AI Privacy Act, and CHATBOT Act. While we appreciate that the Committee is taking the time to look at these bills separately, it’s still impossible to ignore the message Congress is sending to the world: Age-gate the internet and block young people from speaking and accessing lawful speech online. Or else. 

Take action

Tell Congress: don't age-gate the internet

Each of these bills claims to be trying to protect children and teenagers from dangerous situations on and offline—certainly a worthy goal. But the proposed solutions in these bills are unlikely to make children and teenagers safer at all. Rather, they would create sweeping new privacy and data security problems, and force platforms to adopt unconstitutional restrictions on the content they host, for both adults and teenagers. 

There is a better way. Instead of considering these bills, the Senate Commerce Committee should be focusing on a national consumer privacy bill that would protect ALL internet users, or on banning behavioral advertising that tracks us across the web—again, for users of all ages. 

But the bills being considered this week move in the other direction—more information being collected, more surveillance, and less privacy for internet users of all ages. 

Take action

help eff oppose these bills

EFF sent a letter to the Committee with our concerns about these bills. We look forward to continuing to work with them to find a way forward that protects all users. 

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has endorsed a commonsense technical interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), a law not usually given to such interpretation. Amazon had sued Perplexity AI to try to shut down its Comet browser, claiming the browser’s optional agentic AI “Assistant” that can browse websites like Amazon for comparison shopping purposes, violated the CFAA because Amazon did not “authorize” Perplexity to access Amazon users’ accounts. Rejecting that theory, the Ninth Circuit held that Perplexity was unlikely to be liable because users operate the tool, not Perplexity.

That’s the right conclusion, as both a legal and technical matter. As we explained to the court in our amicus brief, the CFAA requires unauthorized “access,” and Perplexity itself does not access Amazon’s servers—users of the Comet browser do. The court agreed, noting that EFF’s explanation “articulates the nature of the system most clearly.”

The court noted that agentic AI may present novel legal issues, and there is “little to no existing caselaw directly dealing with how to ascribe responsibility for AI agents like the Assistant, let alone caselaw specifically dealing with agentic AI in the CFAA context.” Ultimately, though, thorny questions of AI “intent” were irrelevant to this case, because the Assistant “is a tool, not a person for statutory purposes.” And, the court concluded, it is a tool operated by users, not Perplexity. Even where Perplexity received information from users about their Amazon accounts and used this information to instruct the Assistant, the court found that that did not constitute the sort of control needed to find access by Perplexity. As the court noted, Amazon might have other viable claims against Perplexity, but invoking the CFAA was both legally baseless and bad policy that “could expose users themselves to criminal liability. 

This is a gratifying decision because all too often, big players use the CFAA to bully upstarts and innovators who offer potentially helpful user tools. When we counsel clients as part of EFF’s Coders Rights Project, CFAA risk is a frequent topic of conversation, even for developers who merely create tools that allow others to access websites in new or different ways. We’ve stood up for these creators before, and we’ll do it again, but it’s helpful to have back up from one of the most influential appellate courts in the country.

Related Cases: Facebook v. Power Ventures

The end of World War II marked a turning point for global empires; weakened by years of conflict, European nations could no longer hold onto their colonies. A wave of independence followed. This shift was fueled by local anti-colonial activists, the heavy economic toll of the war, and the strategic interests of the new global superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union. Yet these transformations also raised an important question: How would these developing nations approach economic independence?

In his latest book, “Constructing Economic Nationalisms in Brazil and India” (Cambridge University Press, 2026), MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning (DUSP) Associate Professor Jason Jackson tracks how two of these emerging nations developed different brands of economic nationalism from the late 1800s through the early post-World War II era.

The timing of the book is prescient. The rise of globalization in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s led many observers to declare nationalism a relic of the past. Yet economic nationalism has returned with a vengeance over the past few years, making clear the importance of understanding this phenomenon in its historical and contemporary forms. 

Although the idea of economic nationalism is commonly used, it is often misleadingly defined as “anti-foreign,” says Jackson. Instead, Jackson’s research provides a more nuanced definition of how Brazil and India regulated foreign investment after World War II to advance their standing in the industrialized world.

“Brazil and India typically come to mind if one were to ask which countries in Latin America or Asia pursued a lot of nationalist policies, but their approaches to economic nationalism manifested in very different ways,” says Jackson. 

The two countries offer compelling comparisons of how economic policies and development strategies can diverge. Especially during the postwar era, both countries were driven to boost national income and secure economic sovereignty, and both aggressively pursued rapid industrialization. In addition to these shared goals, both countries faced the same basic hurdles: limited access to finance and technology that were deemed essential to building a modern industrial nation.

Jackson argues that it was Brazil’s and India’s colonial past and early independence experiences that formed their diverse approaches to economic growth. He selected two industries — oil and automobiles — to contrast their foreign direct investment policies. By focusing on the colonial experience, he explains how economic policies were born from a mix of cultural identity and material reality.

Jackson’s research relies on primary archival materials, including diplomatic correspondence between American officials in both countries and the U.S. Department of State. Because these officials served as boots-on-the-ground observers and intermediaries, their reports offer unique insights into the motivations of local business and government elites and the strategic concerns of American multinational firms.

“Nationalism manifested in very different ways in both places,” says Jackson. “In Brazil, I found that what was really salient and drove the parameters of economic nationalism was tied to the idea of protecting their natural resources. There was a strong belief that Brazil was very resource-rich and that outsiders — from neighboring countries to global powers — wanted its resources.”

This view was exemplified by oil. The link between anti-colonialism and oil in Brazil dates to the 19th century, beginning with the struggle between landed elites and the imperial court over subsoil property rights. By 1923, this sentiment was so strong that a law was proposed to ban oil concessions to foreigners. Notably, this law occurred before any oil had even been discovered.

By contrast, Brazilians were much less concerned about foreign ownership and control of other areas of industrial production such as manufacturing. To establish their automobile industry, they actively encouraged foreign firms to enter Brazil and to be the dominant partner in joint ventures, with local companies with Brazilian firms playing a more supportive, and often explicitly subordinate, role.

In India, the policies for the development of the petroleum sector and automobile manufacturing were completely reversed. 

Long before the British had arrived in India or the Industrial Revolution began, India was a global leader in textiles. Their rich artisanal history is defined by centuries-old expertise in weaving and dyeing — skills that made Indian fabrics highly sought-after for generations. 

Jackson argues that Indian economic nationalists strongly believed that British “free trade” economic policies toward the Indian colony decimated this age-old industry. “Free trade,” says Jackson, “derailed India from its natural path towards industrialization from the perspective of Indian nationalists. They saw the British as having enforced a trading system that brought in cheap manufactured goods from industrial sites such as Lancashire and Manchester in North West England and undermined artisanal production in India. In fact, many nationalists thought India would have ‘naturally’ had its own industrial revolution had the British never arrived.” 

After winning independence, Indian nationalist elites were determined to address this colonial-era policy structure that had favored British capital. With a “manufacturing” mindset to grow its economic base, foreign automobile firms were restricted from having majority ownership or managerial control of companies in the emerging automobile industry in India. In fact, General Motors, which had been operating in India since the 1920s, was forced out of India in the post-war years, both for their failure to do “real” manufacturing (GM simply imported “complete knock-down kits” that were easily assembled with hand tools, rather than doing “real” manufacturing in the country) and because the government was intent on allowing domestic firms to flourish. 

With oil production, however, Indians did not harbor concerns of foreign control or foreign multinationals taking the lead in extracting India’s petroleum. Despite explicitly recognizing oil multinationals as potential instruments of neo-imperial control, they allowed British and American oil companies to establish dominant positions. 

For Jackson, the biggest takeaway from comparing these two countries and the directions they took to achieve economic independence is that to understand contemporary geopolitics, it's “crucially important” to understand nationalism.

“Up until recently, many scholars thought that economic nationalism was a thing of the past. Yet we now live in a world where it’s fairly undeniable that nationalism is a force,” says Jackson. “In this context, there’s a tension between those that want to retain the kind of liberal, global international order of a few years ago, while there are others pushing for a global economy that is more nationally centered and regionally organized. We see this kind of battle playing out in a variety of ways between the European Union, Russia, China, and the United States.

“If you want to understand today’s complex and ever-shifting geopolitical environment, particularly from the perspective of people in other parts of the world, it’s useful to be able to understand how they interpret the actions of the current global powers. One of the things we can take directly from this book is that we can understand how different kinds of nationalisms shape the ways in which people make sense of not just historical developments or things that have happened in the past, but contemporary geopolitical developments. Together, these help us to assess the present and to imagine possible futures.” 

When Nicholas de Monchaux became head of the Department of Architecture at the School of Architecture and Planning (SA+P) in 2020, he stepped into an unusual set of leadership conditions. He had been due to start in July 2020. Instead, a springtime visit to Cambridge, Massachusetts, coincided with the first Covid-19 lockdowns, and he found himself taking on the role earlier than planned — several months before faculty, students, and staff were able to gather in the same room.

As he concludes his tenure as head of the department before becoming dean of the University of California at Berkeley’s College of Environmental Design, de Monchaux reflects on a period of disruption that became an opportunity to strengthen the department’s infrastructure and advance new models for architectural education and research: “One of the key accomplishments of my time as head of the department has involved finding ways to teach one of MIT’s most physical and collaborative subjects remotely, while keeping the community together and rebuilding our studio culture once we were back on campus,” he says. 

Engaging complexity

The questions that have motivated de Monchaux’s research became central to the challenge of leading the department. As an architect and design theorist, his work draws on the science of adaptive complex systems to examine how design can shape resilient forms of organization under changing conditions.

His first book, “Spacesuit: Fashioning Apollo,” argues that the design of the Apollo spacesuit succeeded through continual adaptation across materials, manufacturing practices, and institutional networks, rather than through engineering optimization alone. His subsequent book, “Local Code: 3,659 Proposals About Data, Design, and the Nature of Cities,” shifts this inquiry from the body to the city, using geospatial data to show how thousands of marginal city-owned vacant lots could collectively support new forms of ecological and civic infrastructure, replacing top-down master planning with coordinated, site-specific interventions. If the impacts of the pandemic could be characterized as an emergent complex system at the scale of the body, the city, the planet — then leadership could be framed as a design problem.

De Monchaux’s understanding of design in relation to complexity science is influenced by his long-standing engagement with the Santa Fe Institute, where he serves as external faculty alongside researchers in the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities. His instinct for combining multiple forms of knowledge can be traced back to MIT — he spent formative years here, where his father, John de Monchaux, served as dean of SA+P from 1981 to 1992. “I was shaped by the ethos of curiosity at MIT,” he says. “Not just when it comes to questions of science and technology, but also those of art, design, and culture.”

Paradox and works in progress

That way of thinking becomes especially relevant in the context of climate change. According to the U.N. Environment Program, the construction and operation of buildings account for almost 40 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, an even larger share when urbanization, transportation, and the wider built environment are taken into account. For architects, this presents a paradox: The systems they work within have contributed substantially to the problems they now seek to solve.

“Over the past six years, our department has focused on two fundamental climate-related challenges,” says de Monchaux. “One is how to build differently through new approaches to circularity and material reuse. The other is how to make our social, cultural, and physical systems more resilient.”

Those priorities find expression in the Climate Studios, a research and teaching initiative nestled under the Option Studios (course number 4.154) that brings together faculty members — including architects, engineers, and historians — to collaborate with students on impact-driven research projects related to climate across multiple years of integrated research and pedagogy. 

“The studios reorganize teaching in the department because students aren’t just working on speculative exercises, they’re working on real issues,” says de Monchaux. “Likewise, the studios reorganize research by allowing faculty to benefit from the boundless energy and imagination of our design students.”

The Climate Studios are part of a wider constellation of climate action initiatives in collaboration with the MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning (DUSP). One example is a collaboration with DUSP and outgoing Department Head Chris Zegras, toward creating an MIT Civilian Climate Corps. Including seminars and workshops on community-focused design for MIT and its neighbors, and student-staffed work on circular material use, the initiative served as an incubator for the MIT Farm. Other projects at different stages of development were presented in the exhibition “Climate Work: Un/Worlding the Planet,” the department’s exhibition at the 2025 Venice Architecture Biennale, curated by de Monchaux alongside incoming department head Ana Miljački and exhibition designer Calvin Zhong ’18, MA ’24, MCP ’24. The exhibition embodied its own principles of circularity: The modular display tables, fabricated in Venice, were designed for reuse, and have since been installed as worktables in the department’s forthcoming home, the Metropolitan Storage Warehouse (the Met) — a space designed, like the exhibition, to invite continual experimentation. 

Building connections

The transformation of the Met has provided another opportunity for de Monchaux to think about architecture as a process of adaptation and collaboration. Having previously worked at Diller Scofidio + Renfro, the architecture firm engaged for the renovation project, he brought a unique perspective to the process, acting as “a translator between two different languages.” Recognizing the shared culture of experimentation that linked the architecture firm and the department, he advocated for a more radical approach to the renovation, pushing the boundaries of what might be expected from an institutional building. 

“It was important that the building remain open-ended and a little raw, because there’s a long tradition at MIT of students and faculty shaping their own studios and spaces,” he explains.

While de Monchaux is proud of the initiatives that took shape during his tenure, as a scholar of complex systems he knows better than to claim ownership over any single project. He describes both architecture and administration as acts of organization and rearrangement, evolving the work of predecessors and making way for those who follow.

One of the clearest examples is the department’s collaboration with Tuskegee University, which will be carried forward by Miljački. The Robert R. Taylor Project builds on a relationship dating back to 1893, when MIT’s first Black graduate and the nation’s first professionally trained Black architect left Cambridge to design much of Tuskegee’s campus, playing an influential role in defining the university’s approach to architectural education. De Monchaux worked closely with Kwesi Daniels, head of architecture at Tuskegee, to establish an exchange program connecting students and faculty through complementary forms of expertise, from the study of historic preservation at Tuskegee to digital fabrication and entrepreneurship at MIT. 

“A relationship that was purely symbolic has now become part of the fabric of the two institutions, expanding access to different programs and ways of teaching,” says de Monchaux. 

Invisible infrastructure 

Less visible, but equally consequential, is the impact of strengthening the department’s underlying social and physical infrastructure. During de Monchaux’s tenure, this has included expanding student governance and community forums, increasing minimum fellowship support for MArch graduate students from 50 to 90 percent of tuition, earning accreditation for the department’s professional degree in architecture, and ensuring that every MArch student has access to a department-provided workstation in studio.

“What we’re really talking about is unlocking the latent curiosity and passion of every person in the department, providing the infrastructure that allows them to accomplish what they wouldn’t be able to do otherwise,” says de Monchaux. 

That statement resonates with an idea he put forth in a 2023 essay for MIT Technology Review, which argued for a return to the roots of the word “design.” Successful designers, he proposed, “reshape not just objects, but also the culture and institutions that create them.” And so, if leadership is a design problem, the goal is to create the conditions for continually new and productive outcomes. The infrastructures built during this period — physical, academic, and social — provide a strong foundation for the leadership of de Monchaux’s colleague and successor, “the incredibly capable and visionary Ana Miljački.”