When people think of asteroids, they tend to picture rare, civilization-ending impacts like those depicted in movies such as “Armageddon.” In reality, the asteroids most likely to affect modern society are much smaller. While kilometer-scale impacts occur only every tens of millions of years, decameter-scale (building-sized) objects strike Earth far more frequently: roughly every couple decades. As astronomers develop new ways to detect and track these smaller asteroids, planetary defense becomes increasingly relevant for protecting the space-based infrastructure that underpins modern life, from GPS navigation to global communications.

The good news for us earthlings is that a team of MIT researchers is on this space-case. Associate Professor Julien de Wit, Research Scientist Artem Burdanov, and their colleagues recently developed a new asteroid-detection method that could be used to track potential asteroid impactors and help protect our planet. They have now applied this new technique to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), demonstrating that JWST can be used to detect and characterize decameter-scale asteroids all the way out to the main belt, a crucial step in fortifying our planetary safety and security. De Wit and his colleagues recently co-led with with Andrew Rivkin PhD ’91 new observations of an asteroid called 2024 YR4, which made headlines last year when it was first discovered. They were able to determine that the asteroid will not collide with the Moon, which could have had impacts on Earth’s critical satellite systems.

De Wit, Burdanov, Assistant Professor Richard Teague, and Research Scientist Saverio Cambioni spoke to MIT News about the importance of planetary defense and how MIT astronomers are helping to lead the charge to ensure our planet’s safety.

Q: What is planetary defense and how is the field changing?

Burdanov: Planetary defense is a field of science and engineering that’s focused on preventing asteroids and comets from hitting the Earth. While traditionally the field has been focused on much larger asteroids, thanks to new observational capabilities the field is growing to include monitoring much smaller asteroids that could also have an impact.

De Wit: When people think about asteroids they tend to think of impacts along the lines of these rare, civilization-ending “dinosaur killer” asteroids — objects that are scientifically fascinating but, happily, statistically unlikely on human timescales. But as soon as you move to smaller asteroids, there are so many of them that you’re looking at impacts happening every few decades or less. That becomes much more relevant on human timescales.

Now that our society has become increasingly reliant on space-based infrastructure for communication, navigation technologies like GPS and satellite-based security systems, we can be affected by different populations of smaller asteroids. These smaller asteroids will probably lead to zero direct human casualties but would have very different consequences on our space infrastructure. At the same time, because they are smaller, they require different technologies to monitor and understand them, both for the detection and for the characterization. At MIT, we are working to redefine planetary defense in a way that is far more pertinent, personable, and practical — focusing on these much smaller asteroids that could have real consequences. In other words, planetary defense is no longer just about avoiding extinction-level events. It is about protecting the systems we depend on in the near term.

Q: Why are observations with telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) so important to keeping our planet safe?

Teague: We’re entering a time now where we have these large-scale sky surveys that are going to be producing an incredible amount of data. We’re trying to develop the framework here at MIT where we can sift through that data as quickly and efficiently as possible, and then use the resources that we have available, such as the optical and radio observatories that we run like the MIT Haystack and Wallace Observatories, to follow up on those potential threats as quickly as possible and determine whether they could be problematic.

We’ve been doing trial observations to try and piece together how fast we can do this. The challenging thing is that the smaller objects that we’ve been talking about, the decameter ones, they’re really hard to detect from the ground. They’re just so small, and so that’s why we really need to use space-based facilities like JWST to help keep our planet safe. JWST is just incomparable, really, for detecting these very small, faint objects. A lot of our work at the moment at MIT is trying to understand is how do we build that entire pipeline ­— from detection to risk assessment to mitigation — under one roof to make it as efficient as possible. And I think this is a really MIT-type of problem to solve. There’s not many places that have the same range of experts in astronomy and engineering and technology to really tackle this properly. It’s really exciting that MIT hosts all these sorts of experts that we’re bringing together to solve this problem and keep our planet safer.

Cambioni: There is going to be what I like to call an asteroid revolution coming up because in addition to JWST’s observational capabilities, there is a new observatory in Chile called the Vera Rubin Observatory that could increase the detection of known small objects in space by a factor of 10. The most important thing to keep in mind, though, is that this observatory will detect the objects but may lose a lot of them. This is where a part of our work is coming in, to basically follow that object and map it as soon as possible. Additionally, Vera Rubin only looks at the reflected light, and it doesn’t get a precise estimate of an asteroid’s size. This gap between detection and characterization is a fundamental problem of asteroid science, between how many objects we discover and how fast we can characterize them. At MIT, we are using our in-house capabilities to help characterize these objects. That includes the MIT Wallace Observatory and the MIT Haystack Observatory.

Q: What role can MIT play in this new era of planetary defense?

De Wit: The reality is that, given the occurrence rate of these smaller asteroids and the new observational capabilities now coming online — from the Rubin Observatory to space-based facilities like JWST — we expect that within the next decade we will identify a handful of decameter-scale objects whose trajectories place them on course to impact the Earth-Moon system within this century. At that point, society will face a very practical question: whether, and how, to respond. Because these are much smaller objects than the dinosaur-killing asteroids, the types of mitigation strategies that we may envision are different. This is also where I think MIT might have an important role to play in the development, design, and potentially even construction of cost-effective, rapid-response asteroid-mitigation strategies. To help organize that effort, we have begun bringing together researchers across the Institute through the Planetary Defense at MIT project, working closely with colleagues on the engineering side.

Teague: What I’m particularly excited about is the way we’ve managed to engage students at MIT in this research as well. We’ve really focused on the impactful research and the way we’re bridging departments and labs within MIT, and this has been a fantastic way to engage students with practical astronomy and research. Saverio has run an IAP [Independent Activities Period] course, and we’re also running a student observing lab with the Wallace Observatory, where we hire a cohort of students every semester, and they’re taught how to use these observatories remotely. They take the data, do the analysis, and this semester, we've got on the order of 10 undergraduate students that are going to be working throughout the semester to take these observations and help us build this observation pipeline.

It's great that here at MIT we’re not only pushing the forefront of the research, but we’re also training the next generation of astronomers that is going to come in and carry this project through and into the future.

Two outstanding MIT educators have been named MacVicar Faculty Fellows: professor of mechanical engineering Amos Winter and professor of electrical engineering and computer science Nickolai Zeldovich.

For more than 30 years, the MacVicar Faculty Fellows Program has recognized exemplary and sustained contributions to undergraduate education at MIT. The program is named in honor of Margaret MacVicar, MIT’s first dean for undergraduate education and founder of the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP). Fellows are chosen through an annual and highly competitive nomination process. The Registrar’s Office coordinates and administers the award on behalf of the Division of Graduate and Undergraduate Education. Nominations are reviewed by an advisory committee, and the provost selects the fellows.

Amos Winter: Bringing excitement to the classroom

Amos Winter is the Germeshausen Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (MechE). He joined the faculty in 2012 and is best known for teaching class 2.007 (Design and Manufacturing I).

A hallmark of Winter’s pedagogy is the way he connects technical learning and core engineering science with real-world impacts. His approach keeps students actively engaged and encourages critical thinking while developing their competence and confidence as design engineers. Current graduate student Ariel Mobius ’24 writes, “Professor Winter is a transformative educator. He successfully blends rigorous technical instruction with lessons on problem scoping and hands-on learning and backs it all up with personalized mentorship. He is a committed advocate for his students and has fundamentally shaped my path as a mechanical engineer.”

Especially notable is Winter’s energetic style and use of interactive materials and demonstrations to make fundamental topics tangible. “He wheels in a large steamer trunk filled with demos he has built or collected to illustrate the day’s topic,” writes Class of 1948 Career Development Professor and assistant professor of mechanical engineering Kaitlyn Becker. “Some demos are enduring classics and others newly designed each year.” Through his “Gearhead Moment of Zen” Winter will share an astonishing car stunt to explain the mechanics using course material. “The theatrics stay in students’ minds,” says Becker, highlighting how Winter’s dramatic examples reinforce learning.

These techniques, combined with a supportive culture, allowed Winter to transform 2.007 from a core class and first subject in engineering design into a celebration of student effort and learning. Throughout the term, students learn how to design and build objects culminating in a robot competition in which their creations tackle themed challenges on a life-size game board. In the past, fewer than half the students were able to compete and today, boosted by Winter’s mentorship and enthusiasm, nearly 97 percent finish a competition-ready robot.

Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering David Hardt writes, “Thanks to Amos, this subject has become transformative for many MechE undergraduates.” Becker concurs: “He is the heart and captain of the 2.007 ‘cheer squad,’ cultivating a caring and motivated teaching team.”

Current graduate student Aidan Salazar ’25 notes, “His teaching philosophy is grounded in empowerment: he encourages students to take risks when designing while giving them the confidence and support needed to do so with thoughtful engineering analysis.”

Winter is also deeply invested in students’ growth outside the classroom. He serves as faculty supervisor for MIT’s Formula SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) and Solar Car teams and guides related UROP projects. In fall 2025 alone, he advised nearly 50 UROP students from the teams, demonstrating his commitment to experiential learning and ability to mentor students at scale.

Salazar continues: “He has offered extraordinary contributions in helping MIT undergraduates embody the Institute’s ‘mens-et-manus’ [‘mind-and-hand’] motto, and I am grateful to be one of the individuals shaped by his teaching.”

“I have always looked up to my colleagues who are MacVicar Fellows as the best educators at the Institute,” writes Winter. “What makes this acknowledgement even more special to me is by earning it from teaching 2.007, which I often cite as one of the best parts of my job. The class is where most mechanical engineering undergraduates gain their first real engineering experience by physically realizing a machine of their own conception. It has been extremely gratifying to watch a generation of students translate their knowledge of engineering and design from the class into their careers … I am honored to have played a role in their intellectual growth and done so meaningfully enough to be recognized as a MacVicar Fellow.”

Nickolai Zeldovich: Inspiring independent thinkers and future teachers

Nickolai Zeldovich is the Joan and Irwin M. (1957) Jacobs Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS). Student testimonials highlight his unique ability to activate their problem-solving skills, cultivate their intellectual curiosity, and infuse learning with joy.

Katarina Cheng ’25 writes, “From my first day of lecture in the course, I was immediately drawn in by Professor Zeldovich’s joy and enthusiasm for every facet of security and its power,” and Rotem Hemo ’17, ’18 says that Zeldovich “empowers students to find solutions themselves.”

Yael Tauman Kalai, the Ellen Swallow Richards (1873) Professor and professor of EECS concurs. She notes that his lectures — with back-and-forth discussion and probing questions — encourage independent thinking and ensure that “everyone feels a little smarter at the end. It is not surprising that students love him.”

Zeldovich’s affinity for problem-solving translates to his curricular work as well. When he arrived at MIT in 2008, Course 6 offered classes in theoretical and applied cryptography, but lacked a dedicated systems security subject. Recognizing this as a significant gap, Zeldovich took it upon himself to create class 6.566/6.858 (Computer Systems Security) in 2009. Since then, the subject has become a central part of the curriculum, but sustained interest from undergraduates revealed another need, and in 2021 he partnered with colleagues to create a dedicated introductory course: 6.1600 (Foundations of Computer Security).

Edwin Sibley Webster Professor of EECS Srini Devadas writes: “What our curriculum was sorely in need of was a systems security class, and Nickolai immediately and single-handedly created [it],” and has “taught this class to rave reviews ever since.”

The impact of Zeldovich’s thoughtful, inquiry-driven approach to pedagogy extends beyond the walls of his classroom, inspiring future educators, teaching assistants (TAs), and even his faculty colleagues at MIT.

Henry Corrigan-Gibbs, the Douglas Ross (1954) Career Development Professor of Software Technology and associate professor of computer science, writes that Zeldovich has “proven himself to be a dedicated teacher of teachers … One of the things that makes teaching with Nickolai so much fun is that he shares his passion with the undergraduates and MEng students who join the course staff as TAs.”

“[He] encourages the TAs to contribute their own creative ideas to the course,” continues Corrigan-Gibbs. “It should not be a surprise then that 100% of the TAs that we have had in our class have signed up to teach with Nickolai again.”

“Due, in no small part, to how I saw Nickolai lead his classroom, I was inspired to become an educator myself,” writes MIT alumna Anna Arpaci-Dusseau ’23, SM ’24. “I saw that the role of an instructor is not only to teach, but to innovate by thinking of creative projects, and to connect by listening to students’ concerns. As I go forward in my career, I am grateful to have such a wonderful example of an educator to look up to.”

Kalai adds, “I have learned a great deal from the two times that I have ‘taken’ (part of) the class from Nickolai. His extensive knowledge and experience are evident in every lecture. There is so much variety to Nickolai’s teaching.”

Nickolai Zeldovich is the recipient of numerous awards including the EECS Spira Teaching Award (2013), the Edgerton Faculty Achievement Award (2014), the EECS Faculty Research Innovation Fellowship (2018), and the EECS Jamieson Award for Excellence in Teaching (2024).

On receiving this award, Zeldovich says, “MIT has a culture of strong undergraduate education, so being selected as a MacVicar Fellow was truly an honor. It’s a joy to teach smart students about computer systems, and the tradition of co-teaching classes in the EECS department helped me improve as a teacher. Most of all, I look forward to continuing to teach MIT’s students!”

Learn more about the MacVicar Faculty Fellows Program on the Registrar’s Office website. 

(Note: This post is also cross-posted on the Let's Encrypt blog)

As announced earlier this year, Let's Encrypt now issues IP address and six-day certificates to the general public. The Certbot team here at the Electronic Frontier Foundation has been working on two improvements to support these features: the --preferred-profile flag released last year in Certbot 4.0, and the --ip-address flag, new in Certbot 5.3. With these improvements together, you can now use Certbot to get those IP address certificates!

If you want to try getting an IP address certificate using Certbot, install version 5.4 or higher (for webroot support with IP addresses), and run this command:

sudo certbot certonly --staging \
--preferred-profile shortlived \
--webroot \
--webroot-path <filesystem path to webserver root> \
--ip-address <your ip address>

Two things of note:

• This will request a non-trusted certificate from the Let's Encrypt staging server. Once you've got things working the way you want, run without the --staging flag to get a publicly trusted certificate.
• This requests a certificate with Let's Encrypt's "shortlived" profile, which will be good for 6 days. This is a Let's Encrypt requirement for IP address certificates.

As of right now, Certbot only supports getting IP address certificates, not yet installing them in your web server. There's work to come on that front. In the meantime, edit your webserver configuration to load the newly issued certificate from /etc/letsencrypt/live/<ip address>/fullchain.pem and /etc/letsencrypt/live/<ip address>/privkey.pem.

The command line above uses Certbot's "webroot" mode, which places a challenge response file in a location where your already-running webserver can serve it. This is nice since you don't have to temporarily take down your server.

There are two other plugins that support IP address certificates today: --manual and --standalone. The manual plugin is like webroot, except Certbot pauses while you place the challenge response file manually (or runs a user-provided hook to place the file). The standalone plugin runs a simple web server that serves a challenge response. It has the advantage of being very easy to configure, but has the disadvantage that any running webserver on port 80 has to be temporarily taken down so Certbot can listen on that port. The nginx and apache plugins don't yet support IP addresses.

You should also be sure that Certbot is set up for automatic renewal. Most installation methods for Certbot set up automatic renewal for you. However, since the webserver-specific installers don't yet support IP address certificates, you'll have to set a --deploy-hook that tells your webserver to load the most up-to-date certificates from disk. You can provide this --deploy-hook through the certbot reconfigure command using the rest of the flags above.

We hope you enjoy using IP address certificates with Let's Encrypt and Certbot, and as always if you get stuck you can ask for help in the Let's Encrypt Community Forum.

Curiosity-driven research has long sparked technological transformations. A century ago, curiosity about atoms led to quantum mechanics, and eventually the transistor at the heart of modern computing. Conversely, the steam engine was a practical breakthrough, but it took fundamental research in thermodynamics to fully harness its power. 

Today, artificial intelligence and science find themselves at a similar inflection point. The current AI revolution has been fueled by decades of research in the mathematical and physical sciences (MPS), which provided the challenging problems, datasets, and insights that made modern AI possible. The 2024 Nobel Prizes in physics and chemistry, recognizing foundational AI methods rooted in physics and AI applications for protein design, made this connection impossible to miss.

In 2025, MIT hosted a Workshop on the Future of AI+MPS, funded by the National Science Foundation with support from the MIT School of Science and the MIT departments of Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics. The workshop brought together leading AI and science researchers to chart how the MPS domains can best capitalize on — and contribute to — the future of AI. Now a white paper, with recommendations for funding agencies, institutions, and researchers, has been published in Machine Learning: Science and Technology. In this interview, Jesse Thaler, MIT professor of physics and chair of the workshop, describes key themes and how MIT is positioning itself to lead in AI and science.

Q: What are the report’s key themes regarding last year’s gathering of leaders across the mathematical and physical sciences?

A: Gathering so many researchers at the forefront of AI and science in one room was illuminating. Though the workshop participants came from five distinct scientific communities — astronomy, chemistry, materials science, mathematics, and physics — we found many similarities in how we are each engaging with AI. A real consensus emerged from our animated discussions: Coordinated investment in computing and data infrastructures, cross-disciplinary research techniques, and rigorous training can meaningfully advance both AI and science.

One of the central insights was that this has to be a two-way street. It’s not just about using AI to do better science; science can also make AI better. Scientists excel at distilling insights from complex systems, including neural networks, by uncovering underlying principles and emergent behaviors. We call this the “science of AI,” and it comes in three flavors: science driving AI, where scientific reasoning informs foundational AI approaches; science inspiring AI, where scientific challenges push the development of new algorithms; and science explaining AI, where scientific tools help illuminate how machine intelligence actually works.

In my own field of particle physics, for instance, researchers are developing real-time AI algorithms to handle the data deluge from collider experiments. This work has direct implications for discovering new physics, but the algorithms themselves turn out to be valuable well beyond our field. The workshop made clear that the science of AI should be a community priority — it has the potential to transform how we understand, develop, and control AI systems.

Of course, bridging science and AI requires people who can work across both worlds. Attendees consistently emphasized the need for “centaur scientists” — researchers with genuine interdisciplinary expertise. Supporting these polymaths at every career stage, from integrated undergraduate courses to interdisciplinary PhD programs to joint faculty hires, emerged as essential.

Q: How do MIT’s AI and science efforts align with the workshop recommendations?

A: The workshop framed its recommendations around three pillars: research, talent, and community. As director of the NSF Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions (IAIFI) — a collaborative AI and physics effort among MIT and Harvard, Northeastern, and Tufts universities — I’ve seen firsthand how effective this framework can be. Scaling this up to MIT, we can see where progress is being made and where opportunities lie.

On the research front, MIT is already enabling AI-and-science work in both directions. Even a quick scroll through MIT News shows how individual researchers across the School of Science are pursuing AI-driven projects, building a pipeline of knowledge and surfacing new opportunities. At the same time, collaborative efforts like IAIFI and the Accelerated AI Algorithms for Data-Driven Discovery (A3D3) Institute concentrate interdisciplinary energy for greater impact. The MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium is also supporting application-driven AI work at the university scale.

To foster early-career AI-and-science talent, several initiatives are training the next generation of centaur scientists. The MIT Schwarzman College of Computing's Common Ground for Computing Education program helps students become “bilingual” in computing and their home discipline. Interdisciplinary PhD pathways are also gaining traction; IAIFI worked with the MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society to create one in physics, statistics, and data science, and about 10 percent of physics PhD students now opt for it — a number that's likely to grow. Dedicated postdoctoral roles like the IAIFI Fellowship and Tayebati Fellowship give early-career researchers the freedom to pursue interdisciplinary work. Funding centaur scientists and giving them space to build connections across domains, universities, and career stages has been transformative.

Finally, community-building ties it all together. From focused workshops to large symposia, organizing interdisciplinary events signals that AI and science isn’t siloed work — it’s an emerging field. MIT has the talent and resources to make a significant impact, and hosting these gatherings at multiple scales helps establish that leadership.

Q: What lessons can MIT draw about further advancing its AI-and-science efforts?

A: The workshop crystallized something important: The institutions that lead in AI and science will be the ones that think systematically, not piecemeal. Resources are finite, so priorities matter. Workshop attendees were clear about what becomes possible when an institution coordinates hires, research, and training around a cohesive strategy.

MIT is well positioned to build on what’s already underway with more structural initiatives — joint faculty lines across computing and scientific domains, expanded interdisciplinary degree pathways, and deliberate “science of AI” funding. We’re already seeing moves in this direction; this year, the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing and the Department of Physics are conducting their first-ever joint faculty search, which is exciting to see.

The virtuous cycle of AI-and-science has the potential to be truly transformative — offering deeper insight into AI, accelerating scientific discovery, and producing robust tools for both. By developing an intentional strategy, MIT will be well positioned to lead in, and benefit from, the coming waves of AI.

Young adults growing up in the attention economy — preparing for adult life, with social media and chatbots competing for their attention — can easily fall into unhealthy relationships with digital platforms. But what if chatbots weren’t mere distractions from real life? Could they be designed humanely, as moral partners whose digital goal is to be a social guide rather than an addictive escape?

At MIT, a friendship between two professors — one an anthropologist, the other a computer scientist — led to creation of an undergraduate class that set out to find the answer to those questions. Combining the two seemingly disparate disciplines, the class encourages students to design artificial intelligence chatbots in humane ways that help users improve themselves.

The class, 6.S061/21A.S02 (Humane User Experience Design, a.k.a. Humane UXD), is an upper-level computer science class cross-listed with anthropology. This unique cross-listing allows computer science majors to fulfill a humanities requirement while also pursuing their career objectives. The two professors use methods from linguistic anthropology to teach students how to integrate the interactional and interpersonal needs of humans into programming.

Professor Arvind Satyanarayan, a computer scientist whose research develops tools for interactive data visualization and user interfaces, and Professor Graham Jones, an anthropologist whose research focuses on communication, created Humane UXD last summer with a grant from the MIT Morningside Academy for Design (MAD). The MIT MAD Design Curriculum Program provides funding for faculty to develop new classes or enhance existing classes using innovative pedagogical approaches that transcend departmental boundaries.

The Design Curriculum Program is currently accepting applications for the 2026-27 academic year; the deadline is Friday, March 20.

Jones and Satyanarayan met several years ago when they co-advised a doctoral student’s research on data visualization for visually impaired people. They’ve since become close friends who can pretty much finish one another’s sentences.

“There’s a way in which you don’t really fully externalize what you know or how you think until you’re teaching,” Jones says. “So, it’s been really fun for me to see Arvind unfurl his expertise as a teacher in a way that lets me see how the pieces fit together — and discover underlying commonalities between our disciplines and our ways of thinking.”

Satyanarayan continues that thought: “One of the things I really enjoyed is the reciprocal version of what Graham said, which is that my field — human-computer interaction — inherited a lot of methods from anthropology, such as interviews and user studies and observation studies. And over the decades, those methods have gotten more and more watered down. As a result, a lot of things have been lost.

“For instance, it was very exciting for me to see how an anthropologist teaches students to interview people. It’s completely different than how I would do it. With my way, we lose the rapport and connection you need to build with your interview participant. Instead, we just extract data from them.”

For Jones’ part, teaching with a computer scientist holds another kind of allure: design. He says that human speech and interaction are organized into underlying genres with stable sets of rules that differentiate an interview at a cocktail party from a conversation at a funeral.

“ChatGPT and other large language models are trained on naturally occurring human communication, so they have all those genres inside them in a latent state, waiting to be activated,” he says.

“As a social scientist, I teach methods for analyzing human conversation, and give students very powerful tools to do that. But it ends up usually being an exercise in pure research, whereas this is a design class, where students are building real-world systems.”

The curriculum appears to be on target for preparing students for jobs after graduation. One student sought permission to miss class for a week because he had a trial internship at a chatbot startup; when he returned, he said his work at the startup was just like what he was learning in class. He got the job.

The sampling of group projects below, built with Google’s Gemini, demonstrates some of what’s possible when, as Jones says, “there’s a really deep intertwining of the technology piece with the humanities piece.” The students’ design work shows that entirely new ways of programming can be conceptualized when the humane is made a priority.

The bots demonstrate clearly that an interdisciplinary class can be designed in such a way that everyone benefits: Students learn more and differently; they can fulfill a non-major course requirement by taking a class that is directly beneficial to their careers; and long-term faculty partnerships can be forged or strengthened.

Team Pond

One project promises to be particularly useful for graduating seniors. Pond is designed to help young college graduates adapt to the challenges of independent adult life. Team Pond configured the chatbot not to simply parrot the user, or to sycophantically praise wrong answers. Instead, Pond provides advice to help with “adulting” (behaving as a responsible adult).

“Pond is built to be your companion from college life into post-college life, to help you in your transition from being a small fish in a small pond to being a small fish in a very big pond,” says sophomore Mary Feliz.

“College is very much a high-proximity and high-context environment, in the sense that everybody around you is going through the same thing, and it’s easy to build relationships or find opportunities, because there are structured pathways that you have access to,” explains graduate student Emaan Khan. “Post-grad life is low-context. You’re not always surrounded by your peers or your professors. It’s no-proximity also, in the sense that you don’t have opportunities at your doorstep. Pond is a tool to help empower you to access certain opportunities, or learn how to navigate.”

Pond’s developers are graduate student Claire Camacho, Harvard University graduate student Charlotte Cheah, Feliz, and Khan. They trained Pond to offer expertise in three areas: social life, professional life, and adult skills.

The students demonstrated Pond’s social communication by asking how to start conversations in a hobby group. Next, they exhibited Pond’s adulting communication by typing in a question.

“My landlord has asked me personal questions that make me uncomfortable. What should I do?”

Appearing in Pond’s textbox was this response: “Politely set boundaries. You are not obligated to answer personal questions. You can gently redirect the conversation back to property-related topics. Know your rights: familiarize yourself with tenant rights in your city or state regarding privacy and landlord conduct.”

When asked how to do that, Pond offered specific instructions: “You can try saying phrases like: ‘I prefer to keep our conversations focused on the property,’ and ‘let’s stick to topics related to the apartment, please.’ Always redirect the conversation back to the apartment or a legitimate maintenance issue. Keep your tone polite but firm. Document any conversations if needed.”

Pond also offered a role-playing scenario to help the user learn what polite-but-firm language might be in that situation.

“The ethos of the practice mode is that you are actively building a skill, so that after using Pond for some time, you feel confident that you can swim on your own,” Khan says. The chatbot uses a point system that allows users to graduate from a topic, and a treasure chest to store prizes, elements added to boost the bot’s appeal.

Team News Nest

Another of the projects, News Nest, provides a sophisticated means of helping young people engage with credible news sources in a way that makes it fun. The name is derived from the program’s 10 appealing and colorful birds, each of which focuses on a particular area of news. If you want the headlines, you ask Polly the Parrot, the main news carrier; if you’re interested in science, Gaia the Goose guides you. The flock also includes Flynn the Falcon, sports reporter; Credo the Crow, for crime and legal news; Edwin the Eagle, a business and economics news guide; Pizzazz the Peacock for pop and entertainment stories; and Pixel the Pigeon, a technology news specialist.

News Nest’s development team is made up of MIT seniors Tiana Jiang and Krystal Montgomery, and junior Natalie Tan. They intentionally built News Nest to prevent “doomscrolling,” provide media transparency (sources and political leanings are always shown), and they created a clever, healthy buffer from emotional manipulation and engagement traps by employing birds rather than human characters.

Team M^3 (Multi-Agent Murder Mystery)

A third team, M^3, decided to experiment with making AI humane by keeping it fun. MIT senior Rodis Aguilar, junior David De La Torre, and second-year Deeraj Pothapragada developed M^3, a social deduction multi-agent murder mystery that incorporates four chatbots as different personalities: Gemini, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, xAI’s Grok, and Anthropic’s Claude. The user is the fifth player. 

Like a regular murder mystery, there are locations, weapons, and lies. The user has to guess who committed the murder. It’s very similar to a board or online game played with real players, only these are enhanced AI opponents you can’t see, who may or may not tell the truth in response to questions. Users can’t get too involved with one chatbot, because they’re playing all four. Also, as in a real life murder mystery game, the user is sometimes guilty.

Photonic chips use light to process data instead of electricity, enabling faster communication speeds and greater bandwidth. Most of that light typically stays on the chip, trapped in optical wires, and is difficult to transmit to the outside world in an efficient manner.

If a lot of light could be rapidly and precisely beamed off the chip, free from the confines of the wiring, it could open the door to higher-resolution displays, smaller Lidar systems, more precise 3D printers, or larger-scale quantum computers.

Now, researchers from MIT and elsewhere have developed a new class of photonic devices that enable the precise broadcasting of light from the chip into free space in a scalable way.

Their chip uses an array of microscopic structures that curl upward, resembling tiny, glowing ski jumps. The researchers can carefully control how light is emitted from thousands of these tiny structures at once.

They used this new platform to project detailed, full-color images that are roughly half the size of a grain of table salt. Used in this way, the technology could aid in the development of lightweight augmented reality glasses or compact displays.

They also demonstrated how photonic “ski jumps” could be used to precisely control quantum bits, or qubits, in a quantum computing system.

“On a chip, light travels in wires, but in our normal, free-space world, light travels wherever it wants. Interfacing between these two worlds has long been a challenge. But now, with this new platform, we can create thousands of individually controllable laser beams that can interact with the world outside the chip in a single shot,” says Henry Wen, a visiting research scientist in the Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) at MIT, research scientist at MITRE, and co-lead author of a paper on the new platform.

He is joined on the paper by co-lead authors Matt Saha, of MITRE; Andrew S. Greenspon, a visiting scientist in RLE and MITRE; Matthew Zimmermann, of MITRE; Matt Eichenfeld, a professor at the University of Arizona; senior author Dirk Englund, a professor in the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and principal investigator in the Quantum Photonics and Artificial Intelligence Group and the RLE; as well as others at MIT, MITRE, Sandia National Laboratories, and the University of Arizona. The research appears today in Nature.

A scalable platform

This work grew out of the Quantum Moonshot Program, a collaboration between MIT, the University of Colorado at Boulder, the MITRE Corporation, and Sandia National Laboratories to develop a novel quantum computing platform using the diamond-based qubits being developed in the Englund lab.

These diamond-based qubits are controlled using laser beams, and the researchers needed a way to interact with millions of qubits at once.

“We can’t control a million laser beams, but we may need to control a million qubits. So, we needed something that can shoot laser beams into free space and scan them over a large area, kind of like firing a T-shirt gun into the crowd at a sports stadium,” Wen says.

Existing methods used to broadcast and steer light off a photonic chip typically work with only a few beams at once and can’t scale up enough to interact with millions of qubits.

To create a scalable platform, the researchers developed a new fabrication technique. Their method produces photonic chips with tiny structures that curve upward off the chip’s surface to shine laser beams into free space.

They built these tiny “ski jumps” for light by creating two-layer structures from two different materials. Each material expands differently when it cools down from the high fabrication temperatures.

The researchers designed the structures with special patterns in each layer so that, when the temperature changes, the difference in strain between the materials causes the entire structure to curve upward as it cools.

This is the same effect as in an old-fashioned thermostat, which utilizes a coil of two metallic materials that curl and uncurl based on the temperature in the room, triggering the HVAC system. “Both of these materials, silicon nitride and aluminum nitride, were separate technologies. Finding a way to put them together was really the fabrication innovation that enables the ski jumps. This wouldn’t have been possible without the pioneering contributions of Matt Eichenfield and Andrew Leenheer at Sandia National Labs,” Wen says.

On the chip, connected waveguides funnel light to the ski jump structures. The researchers use a series of modulators to rapidly and precisely control how that light is turned on and off, enabling them to project light off the chip and move it around in free space.

Painting with light

They can broadcast light in different colors and, by tweaking the frequencies of light, adjust the density of the pattern that is emitted. In this way, they can essentially paint pictures in free space using light.

“This system is so stable we don’t even need to correct for errors. The pattern stays perfectly still on its own. We just calculate what color lasers need to be on at a given time and then turn it on,” he says.

Because the individual points of light, or pixels, are so tiny, the researchers can use this platform to generate extremely high-resolution displays. For instance, with their technique, 30,000 pixels can be fit into the same area that can hold only two pixels used in smartphone displays, Wen says.

“Our platform is the ideal optical engine because our pixels are at the physical limit of how small a pixel can be,” he adds.

Beyond high-resolution displays and larger quantum computers with diamond-based qubits, the method could be used to produce Lidars that are small enough to fit on tiny robots.

It could also be utilized in 3D printing processes that fabricate objects using lasers to cure layers of resin. Because their chip generates controllable beams of light so rapidly, it could greatly increase the speed of these printing processes, allowing users to create more complex objects.

In the future, the researchers want to scale their system up and conduct additional experiments on the yield and uniformity of the light, design a larger system to capture light from an array of photonic chips with “ski jumps,” and conduct robustness tests to see how long the devices last.

“We envision this opening the door to a new class of lab-on-chip capabilities and lithographically defined micro-opto-robotic agents,” Wen says.

This research was funded, in part, by the MITRE Quantum Moonshot Program, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies.

Have you ever seen a really creepy targeted ad online? One that revealed just how much these companies know about your life? It's unsettling enough to see how much companies know about you—but now we have confirmation that the government is also tapping the advertising surveillance machine to get your data. We're explaining the dangers of targeted advertising and location tracking, and the latest in the fight for privacy and free speech online, with our EFFector newsletter.

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER

For over 35 years, EFFector has been your guide to understanding the intersection of technology, civil liberties, and the law. This issue covers a victory for protesters seeking to hold police accountable, a troubling conflict over the Department of Defense's use of AI, and how advertising surveillance enables government surveillance.

Prefer to listen in? Big news: EFFector is now available on all major podcast platforms! In this episode we chat with EFF Staff Attorney Lena Cohen about how targeted advertising can reveal your location to federal law enforcement. You can find the episode and subscribe in your podcast player of choice: 

%3Ciframe%20height%3D%22200px%22%20width%3D%22100%25%22%20frameborder%3D%22no%22%20scrolling%3D%22no%22%20seamless%3D%22%22%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fplayer.simplecast.com%2F924c6faa-1887-475b-a72c-0be4b6f68ba5%3Fdark%3Dfalse%22%20allow%3D%22autoplay%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3E Privacy info. This embed will serve content from simplecast.com

   

Want to stay in the fight for privacy and free speech online? Sign up for EFF's EFFector newsletter for updates, ways to take action, and new merch drops. You can also fuel the fight against online surveillance when you support EFF today!

Canada has a choice to make about its artificial intelligence future. The Carney administration is investing $2-billion over five years in its Sovereign AI Compute Strategy. Will any value generated by “sovereign AI” be captured in Canada, making a difference in the lives of Canadians, or is this just a passthrough to investment in American Big Tech?

Forcing the question is OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, which has been pushing an “OpenAI for Countries” initiative. It is not the only one eyeing its share of the $2-billion, but it appears to be the most aggressive. OpenAI’s top lobbyist in the region has met with Ottawa officials, including Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Solomon...

Surging oil and gas prices could increase inflation — a bad omen for a renewables industry that recently canceled projects because of higher costs.

A federal judge says the agency needs to comply with a December court order to restart a program that helps states prepare for natural disasters.

The leader of Climate United is taking a position with a wealth management firm.

Getting data centers to generate their own electricity may ease one obstacle to public acceptance of data centers. But it creates new hurdles.

Five senators told the Department of Homeland Security inspector general that the Federal Emergency Management Agency has ignored lawmaker queries.

Gov. Jeff Landry said the state is close to a settlement with the oil major that would help restore the Bayou State’s disappearing coast.

The Florida Legislature passed the measure that at one point was strongly opposed by the state’s insurance commissioner, who then dropped his opposition after the bill was tweaked on the Senate floor.

The higher average temperature was driven primarily by the area west of the Mississippi River, which largely missed out on winter this year, said a NOAA scientist.

As temperatures rise aboveground, the number of subway riders reporting uncomfortable conditions increases, says a new study.

Credits and offsets in Alberta’s carbon market, known as the TIER system, have fallen to $22.53, according to a price tracker.

The strategy aims to help mobilize $767 billion a year in investment in clean energy before 2030.

MIT researchers have developed a generative artificial intelligence-driven approach for planning long-term visual tasks, like robot navigation, that is about twice as effective as some existing techniques.

Their method uses a specialized vision-language model to perceive the scenario in an image and simulate actions needed to reach a goal. Then a second model translates those simulations into a standard programming language for planning problems, and refines the solution.

In the end, the system automatically generates a set of files that can be fed into classical planning software, which computes a plan to achieve the goal. This two-step system generated plans with an average success rate of about 70 percent, outperforming the best baseline methods that could only reach about 30 percent.

Importantly, the system can solve new problems it hasn’t encountered before, making it well-suited for real environments where conditions can change at a moment’s notice.

“Our framework combines the advantages of vision-language models, like their ability to understand images, with the strong planning capabilities of a formal solver,” says Yilun Hao, an aeronautics and astronautics (AeroAstro) graduate student at MIT and lead author of an open-access paper on this technique. “It can take a single image and move it through simulation and then to a reliable, long-horizon plan that could be useful in many real-life applications.”

She is joined on the paper by Yongchao Chen, a graduate student in the MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS); Chuchu Fan, an associate professor in AeroAstro and a principal investigator in LIDS; and Yang Zhang, a research scientist at the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab. The paper will be presented at the International Conference on Learning Representations.

Tackling visual tasks

For the past few years, Fan and her colleagues have studied the use of generative AI models to perform complex reasoning and planning, often employing large language models (LLMs) to process text inputs.

Many real-world planning problems, like robotic assembly and autonomous driving, have visual inputs that an LLM can’t handle well on its own. The researchers sought to expand into the visual domain by utilizing vision-language models (VLMs), powerful AI systems that can process images and text.

But VLMs struggle to understand spatial relationships between objects in a scene and often fail to reason correctly over many steps. This makes it difficult to use VLMs for long-range planning.

On the other hand, scientists have developed robust, formal planners that can generate effective long-horizon plans for complex situations. However, these software systems can’t process visual inputs and require expert knowledge to encode a problem into language the solver can understand.

Fan and her team built an automatic planning system that takes the best of both methods. The system, called VLM-guided formal planning (VLMFP), utilizes two specialized VLMs that work together to turn visual planning problems into ready-to-use files for formal planning software.

The researchers first carefully trained a small model they call SimVLM to specialize in describing the scenario in an image using natural language and simulating a sequence of actions in that scenario. Then a much larger model, which they call GenVLM, uses the description from SimVLM to generate a set of initial files in a formal planning language known as the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL).

The files are ready to be fed into a classical PDDL solver, which computes a step-by-step plan to solve the task. GenVLM compares the results of the solver with those of the simulator and iteratively refines the PDDL files.

“The generator and simulator work together to be able to reach the exact same result, which is an action simulation that achieves the goal,” Hao says.

Because GenVLM is a large generative AI model, it has seen many examples of PDDL during training and learned how this formal language can solve a wide range of problems. This existing knowledge enables the model to generate accurate PDDL files.

A flexible approach

VLMFP generates two separate PDDL files. The first is a domain file that defines the environment, valid actions, and domain rules. It also produces a problem file that defines the initial states and the goal of a particular problem at hand.

“One advantage of PDDL is the domain file is the same for all instances in that environment. This makes our framework good at generalizing to unseen instances under the same domain,” Hao explains.

To enable the system to generalize effectively, the researchers needed to carefully design just enough training data for SimVLM so the model learned to understand the problem and goal without memorizing patterns in the scenario. When tested, SimVLM successfully described the scenario, simulated actions, and detected if the goal was reached in about 85 percent of experiments.

Overall, the VLMFP framework achieved a success rate of about 60 percent on six 2D planning tasks and greater than 80 percent on two 3D tasks, including multirobot collaboration and robotic assembly. It also generated valid plans for more than 50 percent of scenarios it hadn’t seen before, far outpacing the baseline methods.

“Our framework can generalize when the rules change in different situations. This gives our system the flexibility to solve many types of visual-based planning problems,” Fan adds.

In the future, the researchers want to enable VLMFP to handle more complex scenarios and explore methods to identify and mitigate hallucinations by the VLMs.

“In the long term, generative AI models could act as agents and make use of the right tools to solve much more complicated problems. But what does it mean to have the right tools, and how do we incorporate those tools? There is still a long way to go, but by bringing visual-based planning into the picture, this work is an important piece of the puzzle,” Fan says.

This work was funded, in part, by the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab.