A startup is selling the military mobile manufacturing units that produce fuel from carbon dioxide.

Despite an executive order to take control of wildfire rebuilding, the administration implemented only one minor regulation. Improved cooperation with local officials made further moves unnecessary, administration officials said.

Lawmakers rejected a precedent-setting bill to hold fossil fuel companies liable for some insurance costs after American Petroleum Institute opposition.

New legislation is part of Democrats deploying the Congressional Review Act against Trump administration rollbacks.

The administrator appointed industry representatives and a member of a group that disputes mainstream climate science.

The court wants to know whether and how Republicans' repeal of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund affects the grants fight.

The carmaker is seeking new battery revenue streams as China’s dominant suppliers cut their prices and electric vehicle growth rates slow.

New York-based Jefferies is telling clients not to panic and to stick with the clean energy sector.

Renewables and a circular economy are part of the EU’s strategic autonomy, argues new ENVI Committee Chair Pierfrancesco Maran.

The Matrix, a 5-ton electric vertical takeoff and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, is considered the largest electric aircraft built so far, at least in China.

Countries around the world are becoming increasingly concerned about their dependencies on the US. If you’ve purchase US-made F-35 fighter jets, you are dependent on the US for software maintenance.

The Dutch Defense Secretary recently said that he could jailbreak the planes to accept third-party software.

This year in a rural school district in southeastern Montana, one high school student is taking calculus. For many people, calculus is daunting enough, even when teachers are used to offering it and peers are around to help. Studying it solo can be even harder. Yet this lone student has an unusual source of support: weekly tutoring directly from an MIT undergraduate, by Zoom, a long-distance but helpful way to stay on track.

It's part of a new program called the MIT4America Calculus Project, launched from the Institute last summer, in which MIT undergraduates and alumni work with school districts across the U.S., from Montana to Texas to New York, to tutor high school students. The logic is compelling: Students are highly proficient at calculus at MIT, where it is almost a requirement for admissions and success. The new civic-minded outreach program lets those MIT people share their knowledge and skills, getting high schoolers ready for further studies and even jobs, especially in STEM fields. 

“Calculus is a gateway for many students into STEM higher education and careers,” says MIT Professor Eric Klopfer, a co-director of the MIT4America Calculus Project. “We can help more students, in more places, fulfill requirements and get into great universities across the country, whether MIT or others, and then into STEM careers. We want to make sure they have the skills to do that.”

At this point, the project is working closely with 14 school districts across the U.S., deploying 30 current MIT undergraduates and seven alumni as tutors. The weekly sessions are carefully coordinated with school administrators and teachers, and the MIT tutors have all received training. The program started with an in-person summer calculus camp in 2025; by next summer, the goal is to be collaborating with about 20 schools districts.

“We want it to have a lasting impact,” says Claudia Urrea, an education scholar and co-director of the MIT4America Calculus Project “It’s not just about students passing an exam, but having tutors who look like what the students want to be in the future, who are mentors, have conversations, and make sure the high school students are learning.” 

Klopfer and Urrea bring substantial experience to the project. Klopfer is a professor and director of the Scheller Teacher Education Program and the Education Arcade at MIT; Urrea is executive director for the PreK-12 Initiative at MIT Open Learning.

The MIT4America Calculus Project is supported through a gift from the Siegel Family Endowment and was developed as a project in consultation with David Siegel SM ’86, PhD ’91, a computer scientist and entrepreneur who is chairman of the firm Two Sigma.

“David Siegel came to us with two powerful questions: How can we spread the educational impact of MIT beyond our walls? And how can we open doors to STEM careers for U.S. high school students who don’t have access to calculus?” says MIT President Sally Kornbluth.

She adds: “The MIT4America Calculus Project answers those questions in a perfectly MIT way: Reflecting the Institute’s longstanding commitment to national service, the MIT4America Calculus Project supplies an innovative answer to a hard practical problem, and it taps the uncommon skill of the people of MIT to create opportunity for others. We’re enormously grateful to David for his inspiration and guidance, and to the Siegel Family Endowment for the financial support that brought this idea to life.”

The U.S. has more than 13,000 school districts, and about half of them offer calculus classes. The MIT effort aims to work with districts that already have existing programs but are striving to add educational support for them, often while facing funding constraints or other limitations.

In contrast to the one-student calculus situation in Montana, the project is also working with a 5,000-student district in Texas, south of Dallas, where about 60 high school students take calculus; currently five Institute undergraduates are tutoring 15 students from the district’s schools.

“Other organizations are involved in efforts like this, but I think MIT brings some unique things to it,” Klopfer says. “I think involving our undergraduates in this is an awesome contribution. Our students really do come from all over the place, and are sometimes connecting back to their home states and communities, and that makes a difference on both sides.”

He adds: “I see benefits for our students, too. They develop good ways of communicating, working with other people and building skills. They can gain a lot of great experience.”

In addition to the in-person summer calculus camp, which is expected to continue, and the weekly video tutoring, the MIT4America Calculus Project is working on developing online tools that help guide high school students as well. Still, Urrea emphasizes, the project is built around “the importance of people. A community of support is very important, to have connections that build over time.  The human aspect of the program is irreplaceable.”

The MIT tutors must pass rigorous training sessions that cover pedagogy and other aspects of working with high school students, and know they are making a substantial commitment of time and effort.

It has been worth it, as teachers say their high school students have been responding very well to the MIT tutors.

“For students to be able to see themselves in their tutors is a really cool thing,” says Shilpa Agrawal ’15, director of computer science and an AP calculus AB teacher at Comp Sci High in the Bronx, New York, where 15 students are participating in the project.

“It’s led to a lot of success for my students,” adds Agrawal, who majored in computer science at MIT. She is part of the national network of MIT-connected teachers who have been helping the program grow organically, having reached out to Jenny Gardony, manager of the MIT4America Calculus Project.

Gardony, who is also the math project manager in MIT’s Scheller Teacher Education program, has been receiving enthusiastic emails from teachers in other participating districts since the project started.

“I have to start by saying thank you,” one teacher wrote to Gardony, adding that one student “was so excited in class today. The session she had with you made her so confident. She’s always nervous, but today she was smiling and helping others, and that was 100 percent because of you.”

Gardony adds: “The fact that a busy teacher takes the time to send that email, I’m touched they would do that.” 

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02592-2

Changing bird nutrient inputs

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02593-1

Amplified variability

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02591-3

Design impacts building emissions

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02594-0

Symbolic policies foster support

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-026-02589-x

Overshoot, the temporary crossing of climate targets before warming is reversed, has shifted from theoretical models to an urgent reality. Addressing this challenge requires effective strategies, global collaboration of different stakeholders and fair governance systems to manage the unprecedented risks.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02515-7

Youth-led translation efforts provide solutions to make climate knowledge accessible worldwide.

The SAFE act, introduced by Senators Mike Lee (R-UT) and Dick Durbin (D-IL), is the first of many likely proposals we will see to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act of 2008—and while imperfect, it does propose a litany of real and much-needed reforms of Big Brother’s favorite surveillance authority. 

The irresponsible 2024 reauthorization of the secretive mass surveillance authority Section 702 not only gave the government two more years of unconstitutional surveillance powers, it also made the policy much worse. But, now people who value privacy and the rule of law get another bite at the apple. With expiration for Section 702 looming in April 2026, we are starting to see the emergence of proposals for how to reauthorize the surveillance authority—including calls from inside the White House for a clean reauthorization that would keep the policy unchanged. EFF has always had a consistent policy: Section 702 should not be reauthorized absent major reforms that will keep this tactic of foreign surveillance from being used as a tool of mass domestic espionage. 

What is Section 702?

Section 702 was intended to modernize foreign surveillance of the internet for national security purposes. It allows collection of foreign intelligence from non-Americans located outside the United States by requiring U.S.-based companies that handle online communications to hand over data to the government. As the law is written, the intelligence community (IC) cannot use Section 702 programs to target Americans, who are protected by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. But the law gives the intelligence community space to target foreign intelligence in ways that inherently and intentionally sweep in Americans’ communications.

We live in an increasingly globalized world where people are constantly in communication with people overseas. That means, while targeting foreigners outside the U.S. for “foreign intelligence Information” the IC routinely acquires the American side of those communications without a probable cause warrant. The collection of all that data from U.S telecommunications and internet providers results in the “incidental” capture of conversations involving a huge number of people in the United States.

But, this backdoor access to U.S. persons’ data isn’t “incidental.” Section 702 has become a routine part of the FBI’s law enforcement mission. In fact, the IC’s latest Annual Statistical Transparency Report documents the many ways the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) uses Section 702 to spy on Americans without a warrant. The IC lobbied for Section 702 as a tool for national security outside the borders of the U.S., but it is apparent that the FBI uses it to conduct domestic, warrantless surveillance on Americans. In 2021 alone, the FBI conducted 3.4 million warrantless searches of US person’s 702 data.

The Good

Let’s start with the good things that this bill does. These are reforms EFF has been seeking for a long time and their implementation would mean a big improvement in the status quo of national security law.

First, the bill would partially close the loophole that allows the FBI and domestic law enforcement to dig through 702-collected data’s “incidental” collection of the U.S. side of communications. The FBI currently operates with a “finders keeper” mentality, meaning that because the data is pre-collected by another agency, the FBI believes it can operate with almost no constraints on using it for other purposes. The SAFE act would require a warrant before the FBI looked at the content of these collected communications. As we will get to later, this reform does not go nearly far enough because they can query to see what data on a person exists before getting a warrant, but it is certainly an improvement on the current system. 

Second, the bill addresses the age-old problem of parallel construction. If you’re unfamiliar with this term, parallel construction is a method by which intelligence agencies or domestic law enforcement find out a piece of information about a subject through secret, even illegal or unconstitutional methods. Uninterested in revealing these methods, officers hide what actually happened by publicly offering an alternative route they could have used to find that information. So, for instance, if police want to hide the fact that they knew about a specific email because it was intercepted under the authority of Section 702, they might use another method, like a warranted request to a service provider, to create a more publicly-acceptable path to that information. To deal with this problem, the SAFE Act mandates that when the government seeks to use Section 702 evidence in court, it must disclosure the source of this evidence “without regard to any claim that the information or evidence…would inevitably have been discovered, or was subsequently reobtained through other means.” 

Next, the bill proposes a policy that EFF and other groups have nonetheless been trying to get through Congress for over five years: ending the data broker loophole. As the system currently stands, data brokers who buy and sell your personal data collected from smartphone applications, among other sources, are able to sell that sensitive information, including a phone’s geolocation, to the law enforcement and intelligence agencies. That means that with a bit of money, police can buy the data (or buy access to services that purchase and map the data) that they would otherwise need a warrant to get. A bill that would close this loophole, the Fourth Amendment is Not For Sale Act passed through the House in 2024 but has yet to be voted on by the Senate. In the meantime, states have taken it upon themselves to close this loophole with Montana being the first state to pass similar legislation in May 2025. The SAFE Act proposes to partially fix the loophole at least as far as intelligence agencies are concerned. This fix could not come soon enough—especially since the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has signaled their willingness to create one big, streamlined, digital marketplace where the government can buy data from data brokers. 

Another positive thing about the SAFE Act is that it creates an official statutory end to surveillance power that the government allowed to expire in 2020. In its heyday, the intelligence community used Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify the mass collection of communication records like metadata from phone calls. Although this legal authority has lapsed, it has always been our fear that it will not sit dormant forever and could be reauthorized at any time. This new bill says that its dormant powers shall “cease to be in effect” within 180 of the SAFE Act being enacted. 

What Needs to Change 

The SAFE Act also attempts to clarify very important language that gauges the scope of the surveillance authority: who is obligated to turn over digital information to the U.S. government. Under Section 702, “electronic communication service providers” (ECSP) are on the hook for providing information, but the definition of that term has been in dispute and has changed over time—most recently when a FISA court opinion expanded the definition to include a category of “secret” ECSPs that have not been publicly disclosed.  Unfortunately, this bill still leaves ambiguity in interpretation and an audit system without a clear directive for enforcing limitations on who is an ECSP or guaranteeing transparency. 

As mentioned earlier, the SAFE Act introduces a warrant requirement for the FBI to read the contents of Americans’ communications that have been warrantlessly collected under Section 702. However, the law does not in its current form require the FBI to get a warrant before running searches identifying whether Americans have communications present in the database in the first place. Knowing this information is itself very revealing and the government should not be able to profit from circumventing the Fourth Amendment. 

When Congress reauthorized Section 702 in 2014, they did so through a piece of policy called the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA). This bill made 702 worse in several ways, one of the most severe being that it expanded the legal uses for the surveillance authority to include vetting immigrants. In an era when the United States government is rounding up immigrants, including people awaiting asylum hearings, and which U.S officials are continuously threatening to withhold admission to the United States from people whose politics does not align with the current administration, RISAA sets a dangerous precedent. Although RISAA is officially expiring in April, it would be helpful for any Section 702 reauthorization bill to explicitly prohibit the use of this authority for that reason. 

Finally, in the same way that the SAFE Act statutorily ends the expired Section 215 of the Patriot Act, it should also impose an explicit end to “Abouts collection” a practice of collecting digital communications, not if their from suspected people, but if their are “about” specific topics. This practice has been discontinued, but still sits on the books, just waiting to be revamped. 

We're celebrating the launch of Privacy's Defender, a new book by EFF Executive Director Cindy Cohn on Thursday, March 12—and we want you to join us! Cindy has tangled with the feds, fought for your data security, and argued before judges to protect our access to science and knowledge on the internet. In Privacy's Defender she asks: can we still have private conversations if we live our lives online?

Join the festivities for a live conversation between Cindy Cohn and Annalee Newitz followed by a book signing with Cindy.

REGISTER TODAY! 

$20 General Admission for 1
$30 Discounted tickets for 2
$12.50 Student Ticket
All proceeds benefit EFF's mission.

Want your own copy of Privacy's Defender?
Save $10 when you preorder the book with your ticket purchase

WHEN:
Thursday, March 12th, 2026
6:30 pm to 9:30 pm

WHERE:
Ciel Creative Space
Entrance located at:
940 Parker St, Berkeley, CA 94710

6:30 PM Doors Open
7:15 PM Program Begins

About the book

Throughout her career, Cindy Cohn has been driven by a fundamental question: Can we still have private conversations if we live our lives online? Privacy’s Defender chronicles her thirty-year battle to protect our right to digital privacy and shows just how central this right is to all our other rights, including our ability to organize and make change in the world.

Shattering the hypermasculine myth that our digital reality was solely the work of a handful of charismatic tech founders, the author weaves her own personal story with the history of Crypto Wars, FBI gag orders, and the post-9/11 surveillance state. She describes how she became a seasoned leader in the early digital rights movement, as well as how this work serendipitously helped her discover her birth parents and find her life partner. Along the way, she also details the development of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which she grew from a ragtag group of lawyers and hackers into one of the most powerful digital rights organizations in the world.

Part memoir and part legal history for the general reader, the book is a compelling testament to just how hard-won the privacy rights we now enjoy as tech users are, but also how crucial these rights are in our efforts to combat authoritarianism, grow democracy, and strengthen other human rights. Learn about the Privacy's Defender book tour.

Parking

Street parking is available around the building.

Accessibility

The main event space is wheelchair accessible, on concrete. Lively music will be playing, and the speakers will be using a microphone, so louder volumes are expected. EFF is committed to improving accessibility for our events. If you will be attending in-person and need accommodation, or have accessibility questions prior to the event, please contact events@eff.org.

Food and Drink

Wine & Beer will be available for purchase. Cellarmaker Brewing Co., located next door to Ciel Space, will be serving food until 8:00 pm. 

Questions?

Email us at events@eff.org.

About the Speakers

Cindy Cohn
Cindy Cohn is the Executive Director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. From 2000-2015 she served as EFF’s Legal Director as well as its General Counsel.  Ms. Cohn first became involved with EFF in 1993, when EFF asked her to serve as the outside lead attorney in Bernstein v. Dept. of Justice, the successful First Amendment challenge to the U.S. export restrictions on cryptography. 

Ms. Cohn has been named to TheNonProfitTimes 2020 Power & Influence TOP 50 list, honoring 2020's movers and shakers.  In 2018, Forbes included Ms. Cohn as one of America's Top 50 Women in Tech. The National Law Journal named Ms. Cohn one of 100 most influential lawyers in America in 2013, noting: "[I]f Big Brother is watching, he better look out for Cindy Cohn." She was also named in 2006 for "rushing to the barricades wherever freedom and civil liberties are at stake online."  In 2007 the National Law Journal named her one of the 50 most influential women lawyers in America. In 2010 the Intellectual Property Section of the State Bar of California awarded her its Intellectual Property Vanguard Award and in 2012 the Northern California Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists awarded her the James Madison Freedom of Information Award.  

Ms. Cohn is the author of the professional memoir, called Privacy's Defender to be published by MIT Press in March, 2026. She is also the co-host of EFF's award-winning podcast, How to Fix the Internet.  

 

Annalee Newitz
Annalee Newitz writes science fiction and nonfiction. They are the author of four novels: Automatic Noodle, The Terraformers, The Future of Another Timeline, and Autonomous, which won the Lambda Literary Award. As a science journalist, they are the author of Stories Are Weapons: Psychological Warfare and the American Mind, Four Lost Cities: A Secret History of the Urban Age and Scatter, Adapt and Remember: How Humans Will Survive a Mass Extinction, which was a finalist for the LA Times Book Prize in science. They are a writer for the New York Times and elsewhere, and have a monthly column in New Scientist. They have published in The Washington Post, Slate, Scientific American, Ars Technica, The New Yorker, and Technology Review, among others. They were the co-host of the Hugo Award-winning podcast Our Opinions Are Correct, and have contributed to the public radio shows Science Friday, On the Media, KQED Forum, and Here and Now. Previously, they were the founder of io9, and served as the editor-in-chief of Gizmodo.