The latest United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) concluded in November without a roadmap to phase out fossil fuels and without significant progress in strengthening national pledges to reduce climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions. In aggregate, today’s climate policies remain far too unambitious to meet the Paris Agreement’s goal of capping global warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius, setting the world on course to experience more frequent and intense storms, flooding, droughts, wildfires, and other climate impacts. A global policy regime aligned with the 1.5 C target would almost certainly reduce the severity of those impacts.

In the “2025 Global Change Outlook,” researchers at the MIT Center for Sustainability Science and Strategy (CS3) compare the consequences of these two approaches to climate policy through modeled projections of critical natural and societal systems under two scenarios. The Current Trends scenario represents the researchers’ assessment of current measures for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; the Accelerated Actions scenario is a credible pathway to stabilizing the climate at a global mean surface temperature of 1.5 C above preindustrial levels, in which countries impose more aggressive GHG emissions-reduction targets.  

By quantifying the risks posed by today’s climate policies — and the extent to which accelerated climate action aligned with the 1.5 C goal could reduce them — the “Global Change Outlook” aims to clarify what’s at stake for environments and economies around the world. Here, we summarize the report’s key findings at the global level; regional details can also be accessed in several sections and through MIT CS3’s interactive global visualization tool.  

Emerging headwinds for global climate action 

Projections under Current Trends show higher GHG emissions than in our previous 2023 outlook, indicating reduced action on GHG emissions mitigation in the upcoming decade. The difference, roughly equivalent to the annual emissions from Brazil or Japan, is driven by current geopolitical events. 

Additional analysis in this report indicates that global GHG emissions in 2050 could be 10 percent higher than they would be under Current Trends if regional rivalries triggered by U.S. tariff policy prompt other regions to weaken their climate regulations. In that case, the world would see virtually no emissions reduction in the next 25 years.

Energy and electricity projections

Between 2025 and 2050, global energy consumption rises by 17 percent under Current Trends, with a nearly nine-fold increase in wind and solar. Under Accelerated Actions, global energy consumption declines by 16 percent, with a nearly 13-fold increase in wind and solar, driven by improvements in energy efficiency, wider use of electricity, and demand response. In both Current Trends and Accelerated Actions, global electricity consumption increases substantially (by 90 percent and 100 percent, respectively), with generation from low-carbon sources becoming a dominant source of power, though Accelerated Actions has a much larger share of renewables.   

“Achieving long-term climate stabilization goals will require more ambitious policy measures that reduce fossil-fuel dependence and accelerate the energy transition toward low-carbon sources in all regions of the world. Our Accelerated Actions scenario provides a pathway for scaling up global climate ambition,” says MIT CS3 Deputy Director Sergey Paltsev, co-lead author of the report.

Greenhouse gas emissions and climate projections

Under Current Trends, global anthropogenic (human-caused) GHG emissions decline by 10 percent between 2025 and 2050, but start to rise again later in the century; under Accelerated Actions, however, they fall by 60 percent by 2050. Of the two scenarios, only the latter could put the world on track to achieve long-term climate stabilization.  

Median projections for global warming by 2050, 2100, and 2150 are projected to reach 1.79, 2.74, and 3.72 degrees C (relative to the global mean surface temperature (GMST) average for the years 1850-1900) under Current Trends and 1.62, 1.56, and 1.50 C under Accelerated Actions. Median projections for global precipitation show increases from 2025 levels of 0.04, 0.11, and 0.18 millimeters per day in 2050, 2100, and 2150 under Current Trends and 0.03, 0.04, and 0.03 mm/day for those years under Accelerated Actions.

“Our projections demonstrate that aggressive cuts in GHG emissions can lead to substantial reductions in the upward trends of GMST, as well as global precipitation,” says CS3 deputy director C. Adam Schlosser, co-lead author of the outlook. “These reductions to both climate warming and acceleration of the global hydrologic cycle lower the risks of damaging impacts, particularly toward the latter half of this century.”

Implications for sustainability

The report’s modeled projections imply significantly different risk levels under the two scenarios for water availability, biodiversity, air quality, human health, economic well-being, and other sustainability indicators. 

Among the key findings: Policies that align with Accelerated Actions could yield substantial co-benefits for water availability, biodiversity, air quality, and health. For example, combining Accelerated Actions-aligned climate policies with biodiversity targets, or with air-quality targets, could achieve biodiversity and air quality/health goals more efficiently and cost-effectively than a more siloed approach. The outlook’s analysis of the global economy under Current Trends suggests that decision-makers need to account for climate impacts outside their home region and the resilience of global supply chains.  

Finally, CS3’s new data-visualization platform provides efficient, screening-level mapping of current and future climate, socioeconomic, and demographic-related conditions and changes — including global mapping for many of the model outputs featured in this report. 

“Our comparison of outcomes under Current Trends and Accelerated Actions scenarios highlights the risks of remaining on the world’s current emissions trajectory and the benefits of pursuing a much more aggressive strategy,” says CS3 Director Noelle Selin, a co-author of the report and a professor in the Institute for Data, Systems and Society and Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT. “We hope that our risk-benefit analysis will help inform decision-makers in government, industry, academia, and civil society as they confront sustainability-relevant challenges.” 

This interview is part of a series of short interviews from the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS). Each spotlight features a student answering their choice of questions about themselves and life at MIT. Today’s interviewee, senior Diego Temkin, is double majoring in courses 6-3 (Computer Science and Engineering) and 11 (Urban Planning). The McAllen, Texas, native is involved with MIT’s Dormitory Council (DormCon), helps to maintain Hydrant (formerly Firehose)/CourseRoad, and is both a member of the Student Information Processing Board (MIT’s oldest computing club) and an Advanced Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (SuperUROP) scholar.

Q: What’s your favorite key on a standard computer keyboard, and why?

A: The “1” key! During Covid, I ended up starting a typewriter collection and trying to fix them up, and I always thought it was interesting how they didn’t have a 1 key. People were just expected to use the lowercase “l,” which presumably makes anyone who cares about ASCII very upset.

Q: Tell us about a teacher from your past who had an influence on the person you’ve become.

A: Back in middle school, everyone had to take a technology class that taught things like typing skills, Microsoft Word and Excel, and some other things. I was a bit of a nerd and didn’t have too many friends interested in the sort of things I was, but the teacher of that technology class, Mrs. Camarena, would let me stay for a bit after school and encouraged me to explore more of my interests. She helped me become more confident in wanting to go into computer science, and now here I am. 

Q: What’s your favorite trivia factoid?

A: Every floor in Building 13 is painted as a different MBTA line. I don’t know why and can’t really find anything about it online, but once you notice it you can’t unsee it!

Q: Do you have any pets? 

A: I do! His name is Skateboard, and he is the most quintessentially orange cat. I got him off reuse@mit.edu during my first year here at MIT (shout out to Patty K), and he’s been with me ever since. He’s currently five years old, and he’s a big fan of goldfish and stepping on my face at 7 a.m. Best decision I’ve ever made. 

Q: Are you a re-reader or a re-watcher? If so, what are your comfort books, shows, or movies?

A: Definitely a re-watcher, and definitely “Doctor Who.” I’ve watched far too much of that show and there are episodes I can recite from memory (looking at you, “The Eleventh Hour”). Anyone I know will tell you that I can go on about that show for hours, and before anyone asks, my favorite doctor is Matt Smith (sorry to the David Tennant fans; I like him too, though!)

Q: Do you have a bucket list? If so, share one or two of the items on it.

A: I’ve been wanting to take a cross-country Amtrak trip for a while … I think I might try going to the West Coast and some national parks during IAP [Independent Activities Period], if I have the time. Now that it’s on here, I definitely have to do it!

Why did humans evolve the eyes we have today?

While scientists can’t go back in time to study the environmental pressures that shaped the evolution of the diverse vision systems that exist in nature, a new computational framework developed by MIT researchers allows them to explore this evolution in artificial intelligence agents.

The framework they developed, in which embodied AI agents evolve eyes and learn to see over many generations, is like a “scientific sandbox” that allows researchers to recreate different evolutionary trees. The user does this by changing the structure of the world and the tasks AI agents complete, such as finding food or telling objects apart.

This allows them to study why one animal may have evolved simple, light-sensitive patches as eyes, while another has complex, camera-type eyes.

The researchers’ experiments with this framework showcase how tasks drove eye evolution in the agents. For instance, they found that navigation tasks often led to the evolution of compound eyes with many individual units, like the eyes of insects and crustaceans.

On the other hand, if agents focused on object discrimination, they were more likely to evolve camera-type eyes with irises and retinas.

This framework could enable scientists to probe “what-if” questions about vision systems that are difficult to study experimentally. It could also guide the design of novel sensors and cameras for robots, drones, and wearable devices that balance performance with real-world constraints like energy efficiency and manufacturability.

“While we can never go back and figure out every detail of how evolution took place, in this work we’ve created an environment where we can, in a sense, recreate evolution and probe the environment in all these different ways. This method of doing science opens to the door to a lot of possibilities,” says Kushagra Tiwary, a graduate student at the MIT Media Lab and co-lead author of a paper on this research.

He is joined on the paper by co-lead author and fellow graduate student Aaron Young; graduate student Tzofi Klinghoffer; former postdoc Akshat Dave, who is now an assistant professor at Stony Brook University; Tomaso Poggio, the Eugene McDermott Professor in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, an investigator in the McGovern Institute, and co-director of the Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines; co-senior authors Brian Cheung, a postdoc in the  Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines and an incoming assistant professor at the University of California San Francisco; and Ramesh Raskar, associate professor of media arts and sciences and leader of the Camera Culture Group at MIT; as well as others at Rice University and Lund University. The research appears today in Science Advances.

Building a scientific sandbox

The paper began as a conversation among the researchers about discovering new vision systems that could be useful in different fields, like robotics. To test their “what-if” questions, the researchers decided to use AI to explore the many evolutionary possibilities.

“What-if questions inspired me when I was growing up to study science. With AI, we have a unique opportunity to create these embodied agents that allow us to ask the kinds of questions that would usually be impossible to answer,” Tiwary says.

To build this evolutionary sandbox, the researchers took all the elements of a camera, like the sensors, lenses, apertures, and processors, and converted them into parameters that an embodied AI agent could learn.

They used those building blocks as the starting point for an algorithmic learning mechanism an agent would use as it evolved eyes over time.

“We couldn’t simulate the entire universe atom-by-atom. It was challenging to determine which ingredients we needed, which ingredients we didn’t need, and how to allocate resources over those different elements,” Cheung says.

In their framework, this evolutionary algorithm can choose which elements to evolve based on the constraints of the environment and the task of the agent.

Each environment has a single task, such as navigation, food identification, or prey tracking, designed to mimic real visual tasks animals must overcome to survive. The agents start with a single photoreceptor that looks out at the world and an associated neural network model that processes visual information.

Then, over each agent’s lifetime, it is trained using reinforcement learning, a trial-and-error technique where the agent is rewarded for accomplishing the goal of its task. The environment also incorporates constraints, like a certain number of pixels for an agent’s visual sensors.

“These constraints drive the design process, the same way we have physical constraints in our world, like the physics of light, that have driven the design of our own eyes,” Tiwary says.

Over many generations, agents evolve different elements of vision systems that maximize rewards.

Their framework uses a genetic encoding mechanism to computationally mimic evolution, where individual genes mutate to control an agent’s development.

For instance, morphological genes capture how the agent views the environment and control eye placement; optical genes determine how the eye interacts with light and dictate the number of photoreceptors; and neural genes control the learning capacity of the agents.

Testing hypotheses

When the researchers set up experiments in this framework, they found that tasks had a major influence on the vision systems the agents evolved.

For instance, agents that were focused on navigation tasks developed eyes designed to maximize spatial awareness through low-resolution sensing, while agents tasked with detecting objects developed eyes focused more on frontal acuity, rather than peripheral vision.

Another experiment indicated that a bigger brain isn’t always better when it comes to processing visual information. Only so much visual information can go into the system at a time, based on physical constraints like the number of photoreceptors in the eyes.

“At some point a bigger brain doesn’t help the agents at all, and in nature that would be a waste of resources,” Cheung says.

In the future, the researchers want to use this simulator to explore the best vision systems for specific applications, which could help scientists develop task-specific sensors and cameras. They also want to integrate LLMs into their framework to make it easier for users to ask “what-if” questions and study additional possibilities.

“There’s a real benefit that comes from asking questions in a more imaginative way. I hope this inspires others to create larger frameworks, where instead of focusing on narrow questions that cover a specific area, they are looking to answer questions with a much wider scope,” Cheung says.

This work was supported, in part, by the Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Mathematics for the Discovery of Algorithms and Architectures (DIAL) program.

When Freesia Gaul discovered MIT Open Learning’s OpenCourseWare at just 14 years old, it opened up a world of learning far beyond what her classrooms could offer. Her parents had started a skiing company, and the seasonal work meant that Gaul had to change schools every six months. Growing up in small towns in Australia and Canada, she relied on the internet to fuel her curiosity.

“I went to 13 different schools, which was hard because you're in a different educational system every single time,” says Gaul. “That’s one of the reasons I gravitated toward online learning and teaching myself. Knowledge is something that exists beyond a curriculum.”

The small towns she lived in often didn’t have a lot of resources, she says, so a computer served as a main tool for learning. She enjoyed engaging with Wikipedia, ultimately researching topics and writing and editing content for pages. In 2018, she discovered MIT OpenCourseWare, part of MIT Open Learning, and took her first course. OpenCouseWare offers free, online, open educational resources from more than 2,500 MIT undergraduate and graduate courses. 

“I really got started with the OpenCourseWare introductory electrical engineering classes, because I couldn’t find anything else quite like it online,” says Gaul, who was initially drawn to courses on circuits and electronics, such as 6.002 (Circuits and Electronics) and 6.01SC (Introduction to Electrical Engineering and Computer Science). “It really helped me in terms of understanding how electrical engineering worked in a practical sense, and I just started modding things.”

In true MIT “mens et manus” (“mind and hand”) fashion, Gaul spent much of her childhood building and inventing, especially when she was able to access a 3D printer. She says that a highlight was when she built a life-sized, working version of a Mario Kart, constructed out of materials she had printed.

Gaul calls herself a “serial learner,” and has taken many OpenCourseWare courses. In addition to classes on circuits and electronics, she also took courses in linear algebra, calculus, and quantum physics — in which she took a particular interest. 

When she was 15, she participated in Qubit by Qubit. Hosted by The Coding School, in collaboration with universities (including MIT) and tech companies, this two-semester course introduces high schoolers to quantum computing and quantum physics. 

During that time she started a blog called On Zero, representing the “zero state” of a qubit. “The ‘zero state’ in a quantum computer is the representation of creativity from nothing, infinite possibilities,” says Gaul. For the blog, she found different topics and researched them in depth. She would think of a topic or question, such as “What is color?” and then explore it in great detail. What she learned eventually led her to start asking questions such as “What is a hamiltonian?” and teaching quantum physics alongside PhDs.

Building on these interests, Gaul chose to study quantum engineering at the University of New South Wales. She notes that on her first day of university, she participated in iQuHack, the MIT Quantum Hackathon. Her team worked to find a new way to approximate the value of a hyperbolic function using quantum logic, and received an honorable mention for “exceptional creativity.”

Gaul’s passion for making things continued during her college days, especially in terms of innovating to solve a problem. When she found herself on a train, wanting to code a personal website on a computer with a dying battery, she wondered if there might be a way to make a glove that can act as a type of Bluetooth keyboard — essentially creating a way to type in the air. In her spare time, she started working on such a device, ultimately finding a less expensive way to build a lightweight, haptic, gesture-tracking glove with applications for virtual reality (VR) and robotics.

Gaul says she has always had an interest in VR, using it to create her own worlds, reconstruct an old childhood house, and play Dungeons and Dragons with friends. She discovered a way to put into a glove some small linear resonant actuators, which can be found in a smartphone or gaming controller, and map to any object in VR so that the user can feel it.

An early prototype that Gaul put together in her dorm room received a lot of attention on YouTube. She went on to win the People’s Choice award for it at the SxSW Sydney 2025 Tech and Innovation Festival. This design also sparked her co-founding of the tech startup On Zero, named after her childhood blog dedicated to the love of creation from nothing.

Gaul sees the device, in general, as a way of “paying it forward,” making improved human-computer interaction available to many — from young students to professional technologists. She hopes to enable creative freedom in as many as she can. “The mind is just such a fun thing. I want to empower others to have the freedom to follow their curiosity, even if it's pointless on paper.

“I’ve benefited from people going far beyond what they needed to do to help me,” says Gaul. “I see OpenCourseWare as a part of that. The free courses gave me a solid foundation of knowledge and problem-solving abilities. Without these, it wouldn’t be possible to do what I’m doing now.”

Facing hospital closures, underfunded pediatric trials, and a persistent reliance on adult-oriented tools for children, the Hood Pediatric Innovation Hub welcomed nearly 200 leaders at Boston’s Museum of Science for MIT-Hood Pediatric Innovation 2025, an event focused on transforming the future of pediatric care through engineering and collaboration.

Hosted by the Hood Pediatric Innovation Hub — established at MIT through a gift by the Hood Foundation — the event brought together attendees from academia, health care, and industry to rethink how medical and technological breakthroughs can reach children faster. The gathering marked a new phase in the hub’s mission to connect scientific discovery with real-world impact.

“We have extraordinary science emerging every day, but the translation gap is widening,” said Joseph Frassica, professor of the practice in MIT’s Institute for Medical Engineering and Science and executive director of the Hood Pediatric Innovation Hub. “We can’t rely on the old model of innovation — we need new connective tissue between ideas, institutions, and implementation.”

Building collaboration across sectors

Speakers emphasized that pediatric medicine has long faced structural disadvantages compared with other fields — from smaller patient populations to limited commercial incentives. Yet they also described a powerful opportunity: to make pediatric innovation a proving ground for smarter, more human-centered health systems.

“The Hood Foundation has always believed that if you can improve care for children, you improve care for everyone,” said Neil Smiley, president of the Charles H. Hood Foundation. “Pediatrics pushes medicine to be smarter, more precise, and more humane — and that’s why this collaboration with MIT feels so right.”

Participants discussed how aligning efforts across universities, hospitals, and industry partners could help overcome the fragmentation that slows innovation, and ultimately translation. Speakers at the event highlighted case studies where cross-sector collaboration is already yielding results — from novel medical devices to data-driven clinical insights.

Connecting discovery to delivery

In his remarks, Elazer R. Edelman, the Edward J. Poitras Professor in Medical Engineering and Science at MIT and faculty lead for the Hood Pediatric Innovation Hub, reflected on how MIT’s engineering and medical communities can help close the loop between research and clinical application.

“This isn’t about creating something new for the sake of it — it’s about finally connecting the extraordinary expertise that already exists, from the lab to the clinic to the child’s bedside,” Edelman said. “That’s what MIT does best — we connect the dots.”

Throughout the day, attendees shared experiences from both the engineering and clinical viewpoints — acknowledging the complexities of regulation, funding, and adoption, while highlighting the shared responsibility to move faster on behalf of children.

A moment of convergence

The conversation also turned to the economics of innovation and the broader societal benefits of investing in pediatric health.

“The economic and social stakes couldn’t be higher,” said Jonathan Gruber, Ford Professor of Economics at MIT. “When we invest in children’s health, we invest in longer lives, stronger communities, and greater prosperity. The energy in this room shows what’s possible when we stop working in silos.”

By the end of the event, discussions had shifted from identifying barriers to designing solutions. Participants explored ideas ranging from translational fellowships and shared data platforms to new models for academic–industry partnership — each aimed at accelerating impact where it is needed most.

Looking ahead

“There’s a feeling that this is the moment,” Frassica said. “We have the tools, the data, and the will to transform how we care for children. The key now is keeping that spirit of collaboration alive — because when we do, we move the whole field forward.”

Building on the momentum from MIT-Hood Pediatric Innovation 2025, the Hood Pediatric Innovation Hub will continue to serve as a connector across disciplines and institutions, advancing projects that translate cutting-edge research into improved outcomes for children everywhere. In January, a new cohort of MIT Catalyst Fellows — early-career researchers embedded with frontline clinicians to identify unmet needs — will begin exploring solutions to challenges in pediatric and neonatal health care in partnership with the hub. 

This work is also part of a wider Institute effort. The Hood Pediatric Innovation Hub contributes to the broader mission of the MIT Health and Life Sciences Collaborative (HEALS), which brings together faculty, clinicians, and industry partners to accelerate breakthroughs across all areas of human health. As the hub deepens its own collaborations, its connection to HEALS helps ensure that advances in pediatric medicine are integrated into MIT’s larger push to improve health outcomes at scale.

The hub will also release a request for proposals in the coming months for the development of its first mentored projects — designed to bring together teams from engineering, medicine, and industry to accelerate progress in children’s health. Updates and details will be available at hoodhub.mit.edu.

As Smiley noted, progress in pediatric health often drives progress across all of medicine — and this gathering underscored that shared belief: when we work together for children, we build a healthier future for everyone.

As people age, their immune system function declines. T cell populations become smaller and can’t react to pathogens as quickly, making people more susceptible to a variety of infections.

To try to overcome that decline, researchers at MIT and the Broad Institute have found a way to temporarily program cells in the liver to improve T-cell function. This reprogramming can compensate for the age-related decline of the thymus, where T cell maturation normally occurs.

Using mRNA to deliver three key factors that usually promote T-cell survival, the researchers were able to rejuvenate the immune systems of mice. Aged mice that received the treatment showed much larger and more diverse T cell populations in response to vaccination, and they also responded better to cancer immunotherapy treatments.

If developed for use in patients, this type of treatment could help people lead healthier lives as they age, the researchers say.

“If we can restore something essential like the immune system, hopefully we can help people stay free of disease for a longer span of their life,” says Feng Zhang, the James and Patricia Poitras Professor of Neuroscience at MIT, who has joint appointments in the departments of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Biological Engineering.

Zhang, who is also an investigator at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, a core institute member at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, an investigator in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and co-director of the K. Lisa Yang and Hock E. Tan Center for Molecular Therapeutics at MIT, is the senior author of the new study. Former MIT postdoc Mirco Friedrich is the lead author of the paper, which appears today in Nature.

A temporary factory

The thymus, a small organ located in front of the heart, plays a critical role in T-cell development. Within the thymus, immature T cells go through a checkpoint process that ensures a diverse repertoire of T cells. The thymus also secretes cytokines and growth factors that help T cells to survive.

However, starting in early adulthood, the thymus begins to shrink. This process, known as thymic involution, leads to a decline in the production of new T cells. By the age of approximately 75, the thymus is greatly reduced.

“As we get older, the immune system begins to decline. We wanted to think about how can we maintain this kind of immune protection for a longer period of time, and that's what led us to think about what we can do to boost immunity,” Friedrich says.

Previous work on rejuvenating the immune system has focused on delivering T cell growth factors into the bloodstream, but that can have harmful side effects. Researchers are also exploring the possibility of using transplanted stem cells to help regrow functional tissue in the thymus.

The MIT team took a different approach: They wanted to see if they could create a temporary “factory” in the body that would generate the T-cell-stimulating signals that are normally produced by the thymus.

“Our approach is more of a synthetic approach,” Zhang says. “We're engineering the body to mimic thymic factor secretion.”

For their factory location, they settled on the liver, for several reasons. First, the liver has a high capacity for producing proteins, even in old age. Also, it’s easier to deliver mRNA to the liver than to most other organs of the body. The liver was also an appealing target because all of the body’s circulating blood has to flow through it, including T cells.

To create their factory, the researchers identified three immune cues that are important for T-cell maturation. They encoded these three factors into mRNA sequences that could be delivered by lipid nanoparticles. When injected into the bloodstream, these particles accumulate in the liver and the mRNA is taken up by hepatocytes, which begin to manufacture the proteins encoded by the mRNA.

The factors that the researchers delivered are DLL1, FLT-3, and IL-7, which help immature progenitor T cells mature into fully differentiated T cells.

Immune rejuvenation

Tests in mice revealed a variety of beneficial effects. First, the researchers injected the mRNA particles into 18-month-old mice, equivalent to humans in their 50s. Because mRNA is short-lived, the researchers gave the mice multiple injections over four weeks to maintain a steady production by the liver.

After this treatment, T cell populations showed significant increases in size and function.

The researchers then tested whether the treatment could enhance the animals’ response to vaccination. They vaccinated the mice with ovalbumin, a protein found in egg whites that is commonly used to study how the immune system responds to a specific antigen. In 18-month-old mice that received the mRNA treatment before vaccination, the researchers found that the population of cytotoxic T-cells specific to ovalbumin doubled, compared to mice of the same age that did not receive the mRNA treatment.

The mRNA treatment can also boost the immune system’s response to cancer immunotherapy, the researchers found. They delivered the mRNA treatment to 18-month-old mice, who were then implanted with tumors and treated with a checkpoint inhibitor drug. This drug, which targets the protein PD-L1, is designed to help take the brakes off the immune system and stimulate T cells to attack tumor cells.

Mice that received the treatment showed much higher survival rates and longer lifespan that those that received the checkpoint inhibitor drug but not the mRNA treatment.

The researchers found that all three factors were necessary to induce this immune enhancement; none could achieve all aspects of it on their own. They now plan to study the treatment in other animal models and to identify additional signaling factors that may further enhance immune system function. They also hope to study how the treatment affects other immune cells, including B cells.

Other authors of the paper include Julie Pham, Jiakun Tian, Hongyu Chen, Jiahao Huang, Niklas Kehl, Sophia Liu, Blake Lash, Fei Chen, Xiao Wang, and Rhiannon Macrae.

The research was funded, in part, by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the K. Lisa Yang Brain-Body Center, part of the Yang Tan Collective at MIT, Broad Institute Programmable Therapeutics Gift Donors, the Pershing Square Foundation, J. and P. Poitras, and an EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowship.

This article may be updated.

Nuno Loureiro, a professor of nuclear science and engineering and of physics at MIT, has died. He was 47.

A lauded theoretical physicist and fusion scientist, and director of the MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Loureiro joined MIT’s faculty in 2016. His research addressed complex problems lurking at the center of fusion vacuum chambers and at the edges of the universe.

Loureiro’s research at MIT advanced scientists’ understanding of plasma behavior, including turbulence, and uncovered the physics behind astronomical phenomena like solar flares. He was the Herman Feshbach (1942) Professor of Physics at MIT and was named director of the Plasma Science and Fusion Center in 2024, though his contributions to fusion science and engineering began far before that.

His research on magnetized plasma dynamics, magnetic field amplification, and confinement and transport in fusion plasmas helped inform the design of fusion devices that could harness the energy of fusing plasmas, bringing the dream of clean, near-limitless fusion power closer to reality.

“Nuno was not only a brilliant scientist, he was a brilliant person,” says Dennis Whyte, the Hitachi America Professor of Engineering, who previously served as the head of the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering and director of the Plasma Science and Fusion Center. “He shone a bright light as a mentor, friend, teacher, colleague and leader, and was universally admired for his articulate, compassionate manner. His loss is immeasurable to our community at the PSFC, NSE and MIT, and around the entire fusion and plasma research world.”

“Nuno was a champion for plasma physics within the Physics Department, a wonderful and engaging colleague, and an inspiring and caring mentor for graduate students working in plasma science.  His recent work on quantum computing algorithms for plasma physics simulations was a particularly exciting new scientific direction,” says Deepto Chakrabarty, the William A. M. Burden Professor in Astrophysics and head of the Department of Physics.

Whether working on fusion or astrophysics research, Loureiro merged fundamental physics with technology and engineering, to maximize impact.

“There are people who are driven by technology and engineering, and others who are driven by fundamental mathematics and physics. We need both,” Loureiro said in 2019. “When we stimulate theoretically inclined minds by framing plasma physics and fusion challenges as beautiful theoretical physics problems, we bring into the game incredibly brilliant students — people who we want to attract to fusion development.”

Loureiro majored in physics at Instituto Superior Tecnico (IST) in Portugal and obtained a PhD in physics at Imperial College London in 2005. He conducted postdoctoral work at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory for the next two years before moving to the UKAEA Culham Center for Fusion Energy in 2007. Loureiro returned to IST in 2009, where he was a researcher at the Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion until coming to MIT in 2016.

He wasted no time contributing to the intellectual environment at MIT, spending part of his first two years at the Institute working on the vexing problem of plasma turbulence. Plasma is the super-hot state of matter that serves as the fuel for fusion reactors. Loureiro’s lab at PSFC illuminated how plasma behaves inside fusion reactors, which could help prevent material failures and better contain the plasma to harvest electricity.

“Nuno was not only an extraordinary scientist and educator, but also a tremendous colleague, mentor, and friend who cared deeply about his students and his community. His absence will be felt profoundly across NSE and far beyond,” Benoit Forget, the KEPCO Professor and head of the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, wrote in an email to the department today.

On other fronts, Loureiro’s work in astrophysics helped reveal fundamental mechanisms of the universe. He put forward the first theory of turbulence in pair plasmas, which differ from regular plasmas and may be abundant in space. The work was driven, in part, by unprecedented observations of a binary neutron star merger in 2018.

As an assistant professor and then a full professor at MIT, Loureiro taught course 22.612 (Intro to Plasma Physics) and course 22.615 (MHD Theory of Fusion Systems), for which he was twice recognized with the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering’s PAI Outstanding Professor Award.

Loureiro’s research earned him many prominent awards throughout his prolific career, including the National Science Foundation Career Award and the American Physical Society Thomas H. Stix Award for Outstanding Early Career Contributions to Plasma Physics Research. He was also an APS fellow. Earlier this year, he earned the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers.

The world’s most common construction material has a secret. Cement, the “glue” that holds concrete together, gradually “breathes in” and stores millions of tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the air over the lifetimes of buildings and infrastructure.  

A new study from the MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub quantifies this process, carbon uptake, at a national scale for the first time. Using a novel approach, the research team found that the cement in U.S. buildings and infrastructure sequesters over 6.5 million metric tons of CO2 annually. This corresponds to roughly 13 percent of the process emissions — the CO2 released by the underlying chemical reaction — in U.S. cement manufacturing. In Mexico, the same building stock sequesters about 5 million tons a year.   

But how did the team come up with those numbers? 

Scientists have known how carbon uptake works for decades. CO2 enters concrete or mortar — the mixture that glues together blocks, brick, and stones — through tiny pores, reacts with the calcium-rich products in cement, and becomes locked into a stable mineral called calcium carbonate, or limestone. 

The chemistry is well-known, but calculating the magnitude of this at scale is not. A concrete highway in Dallas sequesters CO2 differently than Mexico City apartments made from concrete masonry units (CMUs), also called concrete blocks or, colloquially, cinder blocks. And a foundation slab buried under the snow in Fairbanks, Alaska, “breathes in” CO2 at a different pace entirely. 

As Hessam AzariJafari, lead author and research scientist in the MIT Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, explains, “Carbon uptake is very sensitive to context. Four major factors drive it: the type of cement used, the product we make with it — concrete, CMUs, or mortar — the geometry of the structure, and the climate and conditions it’s exposed to. Even within the same structure, uptake can vary five-fold between different elements.” 

As no two structures sequester CO2 in the same way, estimating uptake nationwide would normally require simulating an array of cement-based elements: slabs, walls, beams, columns, pavements, and more. On top of that, each of those has its own age, geometry, mixture, and exposure condition to account for.  

Seeing that this approach would be like trying to count every grain of sand on a beach, the team took a different route. They developed hundreds of archetypes, typical designs that could stand in for different buildings and pieces of infrastructure. It’s a bit like measuring the beach instead by mapping out its shape, depth, and shoreline to estimate how much sand usually sits in a given spot.  

With these archetypes in hand, the team modeled how each one sequesters CO2 in different environments and how common each is across every state in the United States and Mexico. In this way, they could estimate not just how much CO2 structures sequester, but why those numbers differ.  

Two factors stood out. The first was the “construction trend,” or how the amount of new construction had changed over the previous five years. Because it reflects how quickly cement products are being added to the building stock, it shapes how much cement each state consumes and, therefore, how much of that cement is actively carbonating. The second was the ratio of mortar to concrete, since porous mortars sequester CO2 an order of magnitude faster than denser concrete. 

In states where mortar use was higher, the fraction of CO2 uptake relative to process emissions was noticeably greater. “We observed something unique about Mexico: Despite using half the cement that the U.S. does, the country has three-quarters of the uptake,” notes AzariJafari. “This is because Mexico makes more use of mortars and lower-strength concrete, and bagged cement mixed on-site. These practices are why their uptake sequesters about a quarter of their cement manufacturing emissions.” 

While care must be taken for structural elements that use steel reinforcement, as uptake can accelerate corrosion, it’s possible to enhance the uptake of many elements without negative impacts. 

Randolph Kirchain, director of the MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub, principal research scientist in the MIT Materials Research Laboratory, and the senior author of this study, explains: “For instance, increasing the amount of surface area exposed to air accelerates uptake and can be achieved by foregoing painting or tiling, or choosing designs like waffle slabs with a higher surface area-to-volume ratio. Additionally, avoiding unnecessarily stronger, less-porous concrete mixtures than required would speed up uptake while using less cement.” 

“There is a real opportunity to refine how carbon uptake from cement is represented in national inventories,” AzariJafari comments. “The buildings around us and the concrete beneath our feet are constantly ‘breathing in’ millions of tons of CO2. Nevertheless, some of the simplified values in widely used reporting frameworks can lead to higher estimates than what we observe empirically. Integrating updated science into international inventories and guidelines such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) would help ensure that reported numbers reflect the material and temporal realities of the sector.” 

By offering the first rigorous, bottom-up estimation of carbon uptake at a national scale, the team’s work provides a more representative picture of cement’s environmental impact. As we work to decarbonize the built environment, understanding what our structures are already doing in the background may be just as important as the innovations we pursue moving forward. The approach developed by MIT researchers could be extended to other countries by combining global building-stock databases with national cement-production statistics. It could also inform the design of structures that safely maximize uptake. 

The findings were published Dec. 15 in the  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Joining AzariJafari and Kirchain on the paper are MIT researchers Elizabeth Moore of the Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the MIT Climate Project and former postdocs Ipek Bensu Manav SM ’21, PhD ’24 and Motahareh Rahimi, along with Bruno Huet and Christophe Levy from the Holcim Innovation Center in France.

Researchers at MIT and Stanford University have developed a new way to stimulate the immune system to attack tumor cells, using a strategy that could make cancer immunotherapy work for many more patients.

The key to their approach is reversing a “brake” that cancer cells engage to prevent immune cells from launching an attack. This brake is controlled by sugar molecules known as glycans that are found on the surface of cancer cells.

By blocking those glycans with molecules called lectins, the researchers showed they could dramatically boost the immune system’s response to cancer cells. To achieve this, they created multifunctional molecules known as AbLecs, which combine a lectin with a tumor-targeting antibody.

“We created a new kind of protein therapeutic that can block glycan-based immune checkpoints and boost anti-cancer immune responses,” says Jessica Stark, the Underwood-Prescott Career Development Professor in the MIT departments of Biological Engineering and Chemical Engineering. “Because glycans are known to restrain the immune response to cancer in multiple tumor types, we suspect our molecules could offer new and potentially more effective treatment options for many cancer patients.”

Stark, who is also a member of MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, is the lead author of the paper. Carolyn Bertozzi, a professor of chemistry at Stanford and director of the Sarafan ChEM Institute, is the senior author of the study, which appears today in Nature Biotechnology.

Releasing the brakes

Training the immune system to recognize and destroy tumor cells is a promising approach to treating many types of cancer. One class of immunotherapy drugs known as checkpoint inhibitors stimulate immune cells by blocking an interaction between the proteins PD-1 and PD-L1. This removes a brake that tumor cells use to prevent immune cells like T cells from killing cancer cells.

Drugs targeting the PD-1- PD-L1 checkpoint have been approved to treat several kinds of cancer. In some of these patients, checkpoint inhibitors can lead to long-lasting remission, but for many others, they don’t work at all.

In hopes of generating immune responses in a greater number of patients, researchers are now working on ways to target other immunosuppressive interactions between cancer cells and immune cells. One such interaction occurs between glycans on tumor cells and receptors found on immune cells.

Glycans are found on nearly all living cells, but tumor cells often express glycans that are not found on healthy cells, including glycans that contain a monosaccharide called sialic acid. When sialic acids bind to lectin receptors, located on immune cells, it turns on an immunosuppressive pathway in the immune cells. These lectins that bind to sialic acid are known as Siglecs.

“When Siglecs on immune cells bind to sialic acids on cancer cells, it puts the brakes on the immune response. It prevents that immune cell from becoming activated to attack and destroy the cancer cell, just like what happens when PD-1 binds to PD-L1,” Stark says.

Currently, there aren’t any approved therapies that target this Siglec-sialic acid interaction, despite a number of drug development approaches that have been tried. For example, researchers have tried to develop lectins that could bind to sialic acids and prevent them from interacting with immune cells, but so far, this approach hasn’t worked well because lectins don’t bind strongly enough to accumulate on the cancer cell surface in large numbers.

To overcome that, Stark and her colleagues developed a way to deliver larger quantities of lectins by attaching them to antibodies that target cancer cells. Once there, the lectins can bind to sialic acid, preventing sialic acid from interacting with Siglec receptors on immune cells. This lifts the brakes off the immune response, allowing immune cells such as macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells to launch an attack on the tumor.

“This lectin binding domain typically has relatively low affinity, so you can’t use it by itself as a therapeutic. But, when the lectin domain is linked to a high-affinity antibody, you can get it to the cancer cell surface where it can bind and block sialic acids,” Stark says.

A modular system

In this study, the researchers designed an AbLec based on the antibody trastuzumab, which binds to HER2 and is approved as a cancer therapy to treat breast, stomach, and colorectal cancers. To form the AbLec, they replaced one arm of the antibody with a lectin, either Siglec-7 or Siglec-9.

Tests using cells grown in the lab showed that this AbLec rewired immune cells to attack and destroy cancer cells.

The researchers then tested their AbLecs in a mouse model that was engineered to express human Siglec receptors and antibody receptors. These mice were then injected with cancer cells that formed metastases in the lungs. When treated with the AbLec, these mice showed fewer lung metastases than mice treated with trastuzumab alone.

The researchers also showed that they could swap in other tumor-specific antibodies, such as rituximab, which targets CD20, or cetuximab, which targets EGFR. They could also swap in lectins that target other glycans involved in immunosuppression, or antibodies that target checkpoint proteins such as PD-1.

“AbLecs are really plug-and-play. They’re modular,” Stark says. “You can imagine swapping out different decoy receptor domains to target different members of the lectin receptor family, and you can also swap out the antibody arm. This is important because different cancer types express different antigens, which you can address by changing the antibody target.”

Stark, Bertozzi, and others have started a company called Valora Therapeutics, which is now working on developing lead AbLec candidates. They hope to begin clinical trials in the next two to three years.

The research was funded, in part, by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface, a Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Steven A. Rosenberg Scholar Award, a V Foundation V Scholar Grant, the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, a Merck Discovery Biologics SEEDS grant, an American Cancer Society Postdoctoral Fellowship, and a Sarafan ChEM-H Postdocs at the Interface seed grant.

Computer-aided design (CAD) systems are tried-and-true tools used to design many of the physical objects we use each day. But CAD software requires extensive expertise to master, and many tools incorporate such a high level of detail they don’t lend themselves to brainstorming or rapid prototyping.

In an effort to make design faster and more accessible for non-experts, researchers from MIT and elsewhere developed an AI-driven robotic assembly system that allows people to build physical objects by simply describing them in words.

Their system uses a generative AI model to build a 3D representation of an object’s geometry based on the user’s prompt. Then, a second generative AI model reasons about the desired object and figures out where different components should go, according to the object’s function and geometry.

The system can automatically build the object from a set of prefabricated parts using robotic assembly. It can also iterate on the design based on feedback from the user.

The researchers used this end-to-end system to fabricate furniture, including chairs and shelves, from two types of premade components. The components can be disassembled and reassembled at will, reducing the amount of waste generated through the fabrication process.

They evaluated these designs through a user study and found that more than 90 percent of participants preferred the objects made by their AI-driven system, as compared to different approaches.

While this work is an initial demonstration, the framework could be especially useful for rapid prototyping complex objects like aerospace components and architectural objects. In the longer term, it could be used in homes to fabricate furniture or other objects locally, without the need to have bulky products shipped from a central facility.

“Sooner or later, we want to be able to communicate and talk to a robot and AI system the same way we talk to each other to make things together. Our system is a first step toward enabling that future,” says lead author Alex Kyaw, a graduate student in the MIT departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) and Architecture.

Kyaw is joined on the paper by Richa Gupta, an MIT architecture graduate student; Faez Ahmed, associate professor of mechanical engineering; Lawrence Sass, professor and chair of the Computation Group in the Department of Architecture; senior author Randall Davis, an EECS professor and member of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL); as well as others at Google Deepmind and Autodesk Research. The paper was recently presented at the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.

Generating a multicomponent design

While generative AI models are good at generating 3D representations, known as meshes,  from text prompts, most do not produce uniform representations of an object’s geometry that have the component-level details needed for robotic assembly.

Separating these meshes into components is challenging for a model because assigning components depends on the geometry and functionality of the object and its parts.

The researchers tackled these challenges using a vision-language model (VLM), a powerful generative AI model that has been pre-trained to understand images and text. They task the VLM with figuring out how two types of prefabricated parts, structural components and panel components, should fit together to form an object.

“There are many ways we can put panels on a physical object, but the robot needs to see the geometry and reason over that geometry to make a decision about it. By serving as both the eyes and brain of the robot, the VLM enables the robot to do this,” Kyaw says.

A user prompts the system with text, perhaps by typing “make me a chair,” and gives it an AI-generated image of a chair to start.

Then, the VLM reasons about the chair and determines where panel components go on top of structural components, based on the functionality of many example objects it has seen before. For instance, the model can determine that the seat and backrest should have panels to have surfaces for someone sitting and leaning on the chair.

It outputs this information as text, such as “seat” or “backrest.” Each surface of the chair is then labeled with numbers, and the information is fed back to the VLM.

Then the VLM chooses the labels that correspond to the geometric parts of the chair that should receive panels on the 3D mesh to complete the design.

Human-AI co-design

The user remains in the loop throughout this process and can refine the design by giving the model a new prompt, such as “only use panels on the backrest, not the seat.”

“The design space is very big, so we narrow it down through user feedback. We believe this is the best way to do it because people have different preferences, and building an idealized model for everyone would be impossible,” Kyaw says.

“The human‑in‑the‑loop process allows the users to steer the AI‑generated designs and have a sense of ownership in the final result,” adds Gupta.

Once the 3D mesh is finalized, a robotic assembly system builds the object using prefabricated parts. These reusable parts can be disassembled and reassembled into different configurations.

The researchers compared the results of their method with an algorithm that places panels on all horizontal surfaces that are facing up, and an algorithm that places panels randomly. In a user study, more than 90 percent of individuals preferred the designs made by their system.

They also asked the VLM to explain why it chose to put panels in those areas.

“We learned that the vision language model is able to understand some degree of the functional aspects of a chair, like leaning and sitting, to understand why it is placing panels on the seat and backrest. It isn’t just randomly spitting out these assignments,” Kyaw says.

In the future, the researchers want to enhance their system to handle more complex and nuanced user prompts, such as a table made out of glass and metal. In addition, they want to incorporate additional prefabricated components, such as gears, hinges, or other moving parts, so objects could have more functionality.

“Our hope is to drastically lower the barrier of access to design tools. We have shown that we can use generative AI and robotics to turn ideas into physical objects in a fast, accessible, and sustainable manner,” says Davis.

Today, out of an estimated 1 trillion species on Earth, 99.999 percent are considered microbial — bacteria, archaea, viruses, and single-celled eukaryotes. For much of our planet’s history, microbes ruled the Earth, able to live and thrive in the most extreme of environments. Researchers have only just begun in the last few decades to contend with the diversity of microbes — it’s estimated that less than 1 percent of known genes have laboratory-validated functions. Computational approaches offer researchers the opportunity to strategically parse this truly astounding amount of information.

An environmental microbiologist and computer scientist by training, new MIT faculty member Yunha Hwang is interested in the novel biology revealed by the most diverse and prolific life form on Earth. In a shared faculty position as the Samuel A. Goldblith Career Development Professor in the Department of Biology, as well as an assistant professor at the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, Hwang is exploring the intersection of computation and biology.  

Q: What drew you to research microbes in extreme environments, and what are the challenges in studying them? 

A: Extreme environments are great places to look for interesting biology. I wanted to be an astronaut growing up, and the closest thing to astrobiology is examining extreme environments on Earth. And the only thing that lives in those extreme environments are microbes. During a sampling expedition that I took part in off the coast of Mexico, we discovered a colorful microbial mat about 2 kilometers underwater that flourished because the bacteria breathed sulfur instead of oxygen — but none of the microbes I was hoping to study would grow in the lab. 

The biggest challenge in studying microbes is that a majority of them cannot be cultivated, which means that the only way to study their biology is through a method called metagenomics. My latest work is genomic language modeling. We’re hoping to develop a computational system so we can probe the organism as much as possible “in silico,” just using sequence data. A genomic language model is technically a large language model, except the language is DNA as opposed to human language. It’s trained in a similar way, just in biological language as opposed to English or French. If our objective is to learn the language of biology, we should leverage the diversity of microbial genomes. Even though we have a lot of data, and even as more samples become available, we’ve just scratched the surface of microbial diversity. 

Q: Given how diverse microbes are and how little we understand about them, how can studying microbes in silico, using genomic language modeling, advance our understanding of the microbial genome? 

A: A genome is many millions of letters. A human cannot possibly look at that and make sense of it. We can program a machine, though, to segment data into pieces that are useful. That’s sort of how bioinformatics works with a single genome. But if you’re looking at a gram of soil, which can contain thousands of unique genomes, that’s just too much data to work with — a human and a computer together are necessary in order to grapple with that data. 

During my PhD and master’s degree, we were only just discovering new genomes and new lineages that were so different from anything that had been characterized or grown in the lab. These were things that we just called “microbial dark matter.” When there are a lot of uncharacterized things, that’s where machine learning can be really useful, because we’re just looking for patterns — but that’s not the end goal. What we hope to do is to map these patterns to evolutionary relationships between each genome, each microbe, and each instance of life. 

Previously, we’ve been thinking about proteins as a standalone entity — that gets us to a decent degree of information because proteins are related by homology, and therefore things that are evolutionarily related might have a similar function. 

What is known about microbiology is that proteins are encoded into genomes, and the context in which that protein is bounded — what regions come before and after — is evolutionarily conserved, especially if there is a functional coupling. This makes total sense because when you have three proteins that need to be expressed together because they form a unit, then you might want them located right next to each other. 

What I want to do is incorporate more of that genomic context in the way that we search for and annotate proteins and understand protein function, so that we can go beyond sequence or structural similarity to add contextual information to how we understand proteins and hypothesize about their functions. 

Q: How can your research be applied to harnessing the functional potential of microbes? 

A: Microbes are possibly the world’s best chemists. Leveraging microbial metabolism and biochemistry will lead to more sustainable and more efficient methods for producing new materials, new therapeutics, and new types of polymers. 

But it’s not just about efficiency — microbes are doing chemistry we don’t even know how to think about. Understanding how microbes work, and being able to understand their genomic makeup and their functional capacity, will also be really important as we think about how our world and climate are changing. A majority of carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling is undertaken by microbes; if we don’t understand how a given microbe is able to fix nitrogen or carbon, then we will face difficulties in modeling the nutrient fluxes of the Earth. 

On the more therapeutic side, infectious diseases are a real and growing threat. Understanding how microbes behave in diverse environments relative to the rest of our microbiome is really important as we think about the future and combating microbial pathogens. 

The National Academy of Inventors (NAI) has named nine MIT affiliates as members of the 2025 class of NAI Fellows. They include Ahmad Bahai, an MIT professor of the practice in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), and Kripa K. Varanasi, MIT professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, as well as seven additional MIT alumni. NAI fellowship is the highest professional distinction awarded solely to inventors. 

“NAI Fellows are a driving force within the innovation ecosystem, and their contributions across scientific disciplines are shaping the future of our world,” says Paul R. Sanberg, fellow and president of the National Academy of Inventors. “We are thrilled to welcome this year’s class of fellows to the academy.”

This year’s 169 U.S. fellows represent 127 universities, government agencies, and research institutions across 40 U.S. states. Together, the 2025 class hold more than 5,300 U.S. patents and include recipients of the Nobel Prize, the National Medal of Science and National Medal of Technology and Innovation, as well as members of the national academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, among others. 

Ahmad Bahai is professor of the practice in EECS. He was an adjunct professor at Stanford University from 2017 to 2022 and a professor in residence at the University of California at Berkeley from 2001 to 2010. Bahai has held a number of leadership roles, including director of research labs and chief technology officer of National Semiconductor, technical manager of a research group at Bell Laboratories, and founder of Algorex, a communication and acoustic integrated circuit and system company, which was acquired by National Semiconductor. 

Currently, Bahai is the chief technology officer and director of corporate research of Texas Instruments and director of Kilby Labs and corporate research, and is a member of the Industrial Advisory Committee of CHIPS Act. Bahai is an IEEE Fellow and an AIMBE Fellow; he has authored over 80 publications in IEEE/IEE journals and holds more than 40 patents related to systems and circuits.

He holds an MS in electrical engineering from Imperial College London and a doctorate degree in electrical engineering from UC Berkeley.

Kripa K. Varanasi SM ’02, PhD ’04, professor of mechanical engineering, is widely recognized for his significant contributions in the field of interfacial science, thermal fluids, electrochemical systems, advanced materials, and manufacturing. A member of the MIT faculty since 2009, he leads the interdisciplinary Varanasi Research Group, which focuses on understanding physico-chemical and biological phenomena at the interfaces of matter. His group develops innovative surfaces, materials, devices, processes, and associated technologies that improve efficiency and performance across industries, including energy, decarbonization, life sciences, water, agriculture, transportation, and consumer products. 

Varanasi has also scaled basic research into practical, market-ready technologies. He has co-founded six companies, including AgZen, Alsym Energy, CoFlo Medical, Dropwise, Infinite Cooling, and LiquiGlide, and his companies have been widely recognized for driving innovation across a range of industries. Throughout his career, Varanasi has been recognized for excellence in research and mentorship. Honors include the National Science Foundation CAREER Award, DARPA Young Faculty Award, SME Outstanding Young Manufacturing Engineer Award, ASME’s Bergles-Rohsenow Heat Transfer Award and Gustus L. Larson Memorial Award, Boston Business Journal’s 40 Under 40, and MIT’s Frank E. Perkins Award for Excellence in Graduate Advising​.

Varanasi earned his undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology Madras, and his master’s degree and PhD from MIT. Prior to joining the faculty, he served as lead researcher and project leader at the GE Global Research Center, where he received multiple internal awards for innovation, leadership, and technical excellence​. He was recently named faculty director of the Deshpande Center for Technological Innovation. 

The seven additional MIT alumni who were elected to the NAI for 2025 include:

• Robert William Brown PhD ’68 (Physics);
• André DeHon ’90, SM ’93, PhD ’96 (Electrical Engineering and Computer Science);
• Shanhui Fan PhD ’97 (Physics);
• Jun O. Liu PhD ’90 (Chemistry);
• Marios-Christos Papaefthymiou SM ’90, PhD ’93 (Electrical Engineering and Computer Science);
• Darryll J. Pines SM ’88, PhD ’92 (Mechanical Engineering); and
• Yasha Yi PhD ’04 (Physics).

The NAI Fellows program was founded in 2012 and has grown to include 2,253 distinguished researchers and innovators, who hold over 86,000 U.S. patents and 20,000 licensed technologies. Collectively, NAI Fellows’ innovations have generated an estimated $3.8 trillion in revenue and 1.4 million jobs. 

The 2025 class will be honored and presented with their medals by a senior official of the United States Patent and Trademark Office at the NAI 15th Annual Conference on June 4, 2026, in Los Angeles.

What if there were a way to solve one of the most significant obstacles to the use of nuclear energy — the disposal of high-level nuclear waste (HLW)? Dauren Sarsenbayev, a third-year doctoral student at the MIT Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering (NSE), is addressing the challenge as part of his research.

Sarsenbayev focuses on one of the primary problems related to HLW: decay heat released by radioactive waste. The basic premise of his solution is to extract the heat from spent fuel, which simultaneously takes care of two objectives: gaining more energy from an existing carbon-free resource while decreasing the challenges associated with storage and handling of HLW. “The value of carbon-free energy continues to rise each year, and we want to extract as much of it as possible,” Sarsenbayev explains.

While the safe management and disposal of HLW has seen significant progress, there can be more creative ways to manage or take advantage of the waste. Such a move would be especially important for the public’s acceptance of nuclear energy. “We’re reframing the problem of nuclear waste, transforming it from a liability to an energy source,” Sarsenbayev says.

The nuances of nuclear

Sarsenbayev had to do a bit of reframing himself in how he perceived nuclear energy. Growing up in Almaty, the largest city in Kazakhstan, the collective trauma of Soviet nuclear testing loomed large over the public consciousness. Not only does the country, once a part of the Soviet Union, carry the scars of nuclear weapon testing, Kazakhstan is the world’s largest producer of uranium. It’s hard to escape the collective psyche of such a legacy.

At the same time, Sarsenbayev saw his native Almaty choking under heavy smog every winter, due to the burning of fossil fuels for heat. Determined to do his part to accelerate the process of decarbonization, Sarsenbayev gravitated to undergraduate studies in environmental engineering at Kazakh-German University. It was during this time that Sarsenbayev realized practically every energy source, even the promising renewable ones, came with challenges, and decided nuclear was the way to go for its reliable, low-carbon power. “I was exposed to air pollution from childhood; the horizon would be just black. The biggest incentive for me with nuclear power was that as long as we did it properly, people could breathe cleaner air,” Sarsenbayev says.

Studying transport of radionuclides

Part of “doing nuclear properly” involves studying — and reliably predicting — the long-term behavior of radionuclides in geological repositories.

Sarsenbayev discovered an interest in studying nuclear waste management during an internship at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as a junior undergraduate student.

While at Berkeley, Sarsenbayev focused on modeling the transport of radionuclides from the nuclear waste repository’s barrier system to the surrounding host rock. He discovered how to use the tools of the trade to predict long-term behavior. “As an undergrad, I was really fascinated by how far in the future something could be predicted. It’s kind of like foreseeing what future generations will encounter,” Sarsenbayev says.

The timing of the Berkeley internship was fortuitous. It was at the laboratory that he worked with Haruko Murakami Wainwright, who was herself getting started at MIT NSE. (Wainwright is the Mitsui Career Development Professor in Contemporary Technology, and an assistant professor of NSE and of civil and environmental engineering).

Looking to pursue graduate studies in the field of nuclear waste management, Sarsenbayev followed Wainwright to MIT, where he has further researched the modeling of radionuclide transport. He is the first author on a paper that details mechanisms to increase the robustness of models describing the transport of radionuclides. The work captures the complexity of interactions between engineered barrier components, including cement-based materials and clay barriers, the typical medium proposed for the storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel.

Sarsenbayev is pleased with the results of the model’s prediction, which closely mirrors experiments conducted at the Mont Terri research site in Switzerland, famous for studies in the interactions between cement and clay. “I was fortunate to work with Doctor Carl Steefel and Professor Christophe Tournassat, leading experts in computational geochemistry,” he says.

Real-life transport mechanisms involve many physical and chemical processes, the complexities of which increase the size of the computational model dramatically. Reactive transport modeling — which combines the simulation of fluid flow, chemical reactions, and the transport of substances through subsurface media — has evolved significantly over the past few decades. However, running accurate simulations comes with trade-offs: The software can require days to weeks of computing time on high-performance clusters running in parallel.

To arrive at results faster by saving on computing time, Sarsenbayev is developing a framework that integrates AI-based “surrogate models,” which train on simulated data and approximate the physical systems. The AI algorithms make predictions of radionuclide behavior faster and less computationally intensive than the traditional equivalent.

Doctoral research focus

Sarsenbayev is using his modeling expertise in his primary doctoral work as well — in evaluating the potential of spent nuclear fuel as an anthropogenic geothermal energy source. “In fact, geothermal heat is largely due to the natural decay of radioisotopes in Earth’s crust, so using decay heat from spent fuel is conceptually similar,” he says. A canister of nuclear waste can generate, under conservative assumptions, the energy equivalent of 1,000 square meters (a little under a quarter of an acre) of solar panels.

Because the potential for heat from a canister is significant — a typical one (depending on how long it was cooled in the spent fuel pool) has a temperature of around 150 degrees Celsius — but not enormous, extracting heat from this source makes use of a process called a binary cycle system. In such a system, heat is extracted indirectly: the canister warms a closed water loop, which in turn transfers that heat to a secondary low-boiling-point fluid that powers the turbine.

Sarsenbayev’s work develops a conceptual model of a binary-cycle geothermal system powered by heat from high-level radioactive waste. Early modeling results have been published and look promising. While the potential for such energy extraction is at the proof-of-concept stage in modeling, Sarsenbayev is hopeful that it will find success when translated to practice. “Converting a liability into an energy source is what we want, and this solution delivers,” he says.

Despite work being all-consuming — “I’m almost obsessed with and love my work” — Sarsenbayev finds time to write reflective poetry in both Kazakh, his native language, and Russian, which he learned growing up. He’s also enamored by astrophotography, taking pictures of celestial bodies. Finding the right night sky can be a challenge, but the canyons near his home in Almaty are an especially good fit. He goes on photography sessions whenever he visits home for the holidays, and his love for Almaty shines through. “Almaty means 'the place where apples originated.' This part of Central Asia is very beautiful; although we have environmental pollution, this is a place with a rich history,” Sarsenbayev says.

Sarsenbayev is especially keen on finding ways to communicate both the arts and sciences to future generations. “Obviously, you have to be technically rigorous and get the modeling right, but you also have to understand and convey the broader picture of why you’re doing the work, what the end goal is,” he says. Through that lens, the impact of Sarsenbayev’s doctoral work is significant. The end goal? Removing the bottleneck for nuclear energy adoption by producing carbon-free power and ensuring the safe disposal of radioactive waste.

All starting from the same DNA, neurons ultimately take on individual characteristics in the brain and body. Differences in which genes they transcribe into RNA help determine which type of neuron they become, and from there, a new MIT study shows, individual cells edit a selection of sites in those RNA transcripts, each at their own widely varying rates.

The new study surveyed the whole landscape of RNA editing in more than 200 individual cells commonly used as models of fundamental neural biology: tonic and phasic motor neurons of the fruit fly. One of the main findings is that most sites were edited at rates between the “all-or-nothing” extremes many scientists have assumed based on more limited studies in mammals, says senior author Troy Littleton, the Menicon Professor in the MIT departments of Biology and Brain and Cognitive Sciences. The resulting dataset and open-access analyses, recently published in eLife, set the table for discoveries about how RNA editing affects neural function and what enzymes implement those edits.

“We have this ‘alphabet’ now for RNA editing in these neurons,” Littleton says. “We know which genes are edited in these neurons, so we can go in and begin to ask questions as to what is that editing doing to the neuron at the most interesting targets.”

Andres Crane PhD ’24, who earned his doctorate in Littleton’s lab based on this work, is the study’s lead author.

From a genome of about 15,000 genes, Littleton and Crane’s team found, the neurons made hundreds of edits in transcripts from hundreds of genes. For example, the team documented “canonical” edits of 316 sites in 210 genes. Canonical means that the edits were made by the well-studied enzyme ADAR, which is also found in mammals, including humans. Of the 316 edits, 175 occurred in regions that encode the contents of proteins. Analysis indeed suggested 60 are likely to significantly alter amino acids. But they also found 141 more editing sites in areas that don’t code for proteins but instead affect their production, which means they could affect protein levels, rather than their contents.

The team also found many “non-canonical” edits that ADAR didn’t make. That’s important, Littleton says, because that information could aid in discovering more enzymes involved in RNA editing, potentially across species. That, in turn, could expand the possibilities for future genetic therapies.

“In the future, if we can begin to understand in flies what the enzymes are that make these other non-canonical edits, it would give us broader coverage for thinking about doing things like repairing human genomes where a mutation has broken a protein of interest,” Littleton says.

Moreover, by looking specifically at fly larvae, the team found many edits that were specific to juveniles, versus adults, suggesting potential significance during development. And because they looked at full gene transcripts of individual neurons, the team was also able to find editing targets that had not been cataloged before.

Widely varying rates

Some of the most heavily edited RNAs were from genes that make critical contributions to neural circuit communication such as neurotransmitter release, and the channels that cells form to regulate the flow of chemical ions that vary their electrical properties. The study identified 27 sites in 18 genes that were edited more than 90 percent of the time.

Yet neurons sometimes varied quite widely in whether they would edit a site, which suggests that even neurons of the same type can still take on significant degrees of individuality.

“Some neurons displayed ~100 percent editing at certain sites, while others displayed no editing for the same target,” the team wrote in eLife. “Such dramatic differences in editing rate at specific target sites is likely to contribute to the heterogeneous features observed within the same neuronal population.”

On average, any given site was edited about two-thirds of the time, and most sites were edited within a range well between all-or-nothing extremes.

“The vast majority of editing events we found were somewhere between 20 percent and 70 percent,” Littleton says. “We were seeing mixed ratios of edited and unedited transcripts within a single cell.”

Also, the more a gene was expressed, the less editing it experienced, suggesting that ADAR could only keep up so much with its editing opportunities.

Potential impacts on function

One of the key questions the data enables scientists to ask is what impact RNA edits have on the function of the cells. In a 2023 study, Littleton’s lab began to tackle this question by looking at just two edits they found in the most heavily edited gene: complexin. Complexin’s protein product restrains release of the neurotransmitter glutamate, making it a key regulator of neural circuit communication. They found that by mixing and matching edits, neurons produced up to eight different versions of the protein with significant effects on their glutamate release and synaptic electrical current. But in the new study, the team reports 13 more edits in complexin that are yet to be studied.

Littleton says he’s intrigued by another key protein, called Arc1, that the study shows experienced a non-canonical edit. Arc is a vitally important gene in “synaptic plasticity,” which is the property neurons have of adjusting the strength or presence of their “synapse” circuit connections in response to nervous system activity. Such neural nimbleness is hypothesized to be the basis of how the brain can responsively encode new information in learning and memory. Notably, Arc1 editing fails to occur in fruit flies that model Alzheimer’s disease.

Littleton says the lab is now working hard to understand how the RNA edits they’ve documented affect function in the fly motor neurons.

In addition to Crane and Littleton, the study’s other authors are Michiko Inouye and Suresh Jetti.

The National Institutes of Health, The Freedom Together Foundation, and The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory provided support for the study.

A number of advanced energy technologies — including fuel cells, electrolyzers, and an emerging class of low-power electronics — use protons as the key charge carrier. Whether or not these devices will be widely adopted hinges, in part, on how efficiently they can move protons.

One class of materials known as metal oxides has shown promise in conducting protons at temperatures above 400 degrees Celsius. But researchers have struggled to find the best materials to increase the proton conductivity at lower temperatures and improve efficiency.

Now, MIT researchers have developed a physical model to predict proton mobility across a wide range of metal oxides. In a new paper, the researchers ranked the most important features of metal oxides for facilitating proton conduction, and demonstrated for the first time how much the flexibility of the materials’ oxide ions improves their ability to transfer protons.

The researchers believe their findings can guide scientists and engineers as they develop materials for more efficient energy technologies enabled by protons, which are lighter, smaller, and more abundant than more common charge carriers like lithium ions.

“If you understand the mechanism of a process and what material traits govern that mechanism, then you can tune those traits to improve the speed of that process — in this case, proton conduction,” says Bilge Yildiz, the Breen M. Kerr Professor in the departments of Nuclear Science and Engineering (NSE) and Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE) at MIT and the senior author of a paper describing the work. “For this application, we need to understand these quantitative relations between the proton transfer and the material’s structural, chemical, electronic, and dynamic traits. Establishing these relations can help us screen material databases to find compounds that satisfy those material traits, or even go beyond screening. There could be ways to use generative AI tools to create compounds that optimize for those traits.”

The paper appears in the journal Matter. Joining Yildiz are Heejung W. Chung, the paper’s first author and an MIT PhD student in DMSE; Pjotrs Žguns, a former postdoc in DMSE; and Ju Li, the Carl Richard Soderberg Professor of Power Engineering in NSE and DMSE.

Making protons hop

Protons are already used at scale in electrolyzers for hydrogen production and in fuel cells. They are also expected to be used in promising energy-storage technologies such as proton batteries, which could be water-based and rely on cheaper materials than lithium-ion batteries. A more recent and exciting application is low-energy, brain-inspired computing to emulate synaptic functions in devices for artificial intelligence.

“Proton conductors are important materials in different energy conversion technologies for clean electricity, clean fuels, and clean industrial chemical synthesis,” explains Yildiz. “Inorganic, scalable proton conductors that work at room temperature are also needed for energy-efficient brain-inspired computing.”

Protons, which are the positively charged state of hydrogen, are different from lithium or sodium ions because they don’t have their own electrons — protons consist of just the bare nucleus. Therefore, protons prefer to embed into the electron clouds of nearby ions, hopping from one to the next. In metal oxides, protons embed into oxygen ions, forming a covalent bond, and hop to a nearby oxygen ion through a hydrogen bond. After every hop, the covalent H-O bond rotates to prevent the proton from shuttling back and forth.

All that hopping and rotating got MIT’s researchers thinking that the flexibility of those oxide ion sublattices must be important for conducting protons. Indeed, their previous studies in another class of proton conductors had shown how lattice flexibility impacts proton transport.

For their study, the researchers created a metric to quantify lattice flexibility across materials that they call “O…O fluctuation,” which measures the change in spacing between oxygen ions contributed by phonons at finite temperature. They also created a dataset of other material features that influence proton mobility and set out to quantify how important each one is for facilitating proton conduction.

“We were trying to better understand how protons move through these inorganic materials so that we can optimize them and improve the efficiency of downstream energy and computing applications,” Chung explains.

The researchers ranked the importance of all seven features they studied, which also included structural and chemical traits of materials, and trained a model on the findings to predict how well materials would conduct protons. The model found that the two most important features in predicting proton transfer barriers are the hydrogen bond length and the oxygen sublattice flexibility characterized by the O…O fluctuation metric. The shorter the hydrogen bond length, the better the material was at transporting protons, which aligned with previous studies of metal oxides. The researchers’ O…O fluctuation metric was the new and the second most important feature they studied. The more flexible the oxygen ion chains, the better the proton conduction.

Better proton conductors

The researchers believe their model could be used to estimate proton conduction across a broader range of materials.

“We always have to be cautious about generalizing findings, but the local chemistries and structures we studied have a wide enough spectrum that we think this finding is broadly applicable to a range of inorganic proton conductors,” Yildiz says.

Beyond being used to screen for promising materials, the researchers say their findings could also be used to train generative AI models to create materials optimized for proton transfer. As our understanding of materials improves, that could enable a new class of hyper-efficient clean energy technologies.

“There are very large materials databases generated recently in the field, for example those by Google and Microsoft, that could be screened for these relations we’ve found,” Yildiz says. “If the material compound that satisfies these parameters does not exist, we could also use these parameters to generate new compounds. That would enable increases in the energy efficiency and viability of clean energy conversion and low-power computing devices. For that, we need to figure out how to get more flexible oxide ion sublattices that are percolated. What are the composition and structure metrics that I can use to design the material to have that flexibility? Those are the next steps.”

The research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Frontier Center – Hydrogen in Energy and Information Sciences – and the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program.

During early development, tissues and organs begin to bloom through the shifting, splitting, and growing of many thousands of cells.

A team of MIT engineers has now developed a way to predict, minute by minute, how individual cells will fold, divide, and rearrange during a fruit fly’s earliest stage of growth. The new method may one day be applied to predict the development of more complex tissues, organs, and organisms. It could also help scientists identify cell patterns that correspond to early-onset diseases, such as asthma and cancer.

In a study appearing today in the journal Nature Methods, the team presents a new deep-learning model that learns, then predicts, how certain geometric properties of individual cells will change as a fruit fly develops. The model records and tracks properties such as a cell’s position, and whether it is touching a neighboring cell at a given moment.

The team applied the model to videos of developing fruit fly embryos, each of which starts as a cluster of about 5,000 cells. They found the model could predict, with 90 percent accuracy, how each of the 5,000 cells would fold, shift, and rearrange, minute by minute, during the first hour of development, as the embryo morphs from a smooth, uniform shape into more defined structures and features.

“This very initial phase is known as gastrulation, which takes place over roughly one hour, when individual cells are rearranging on a time scale of minutes,” says study author Ming Guo, associate professor of mechanical engineering at MIT. “By accurately modeling this early period, we can start to uncover how local cell interactions give rise to global tissues and organisms.”

The researchers hope to apply the model to predict the cell-by-cell development in other species, such zebrafish and mice. Then, they can begin to identify patterns that are common across species. The team also envisions that the method could be used to discern early patterns of disease, such as in asthma. Lung tissue in people with asthma looks markedly different from healthy lung tissue. How asthma-prone tissue initially develops is an unknown process that the team’s new method could potentially reveal.

“Asthmatic tissues show different cell dynamics when imaged live,” says co-author and MIT graduate student Haiqian Yang. “We envision that our model could capture these subtle dynamical differences and provide a more comprehensive representation of tissue behavior, potentially improving diagnostics or drug-screening assays.”

The study’s co-authors are Markus Buehler, the McAfee Professor of Engineering in MIT’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering; George Roy and Tomer Stern of the University of Michigan; and Anh Nguyen and Dapeng Bi of Northeastern University.

Points and foams

Scientists typically model how an embryo develops in one of two ways: as a point cloud, where each point represents an individual cell as point that moves over time; or as a “foam,” which represents individual cells as bubbles that shift and slide against each other, similar to the bubbles in shaving foam.

Rather than choose between the two approaches, Guo and Yang embraced both.

“There’s a debate about whether to model as a point cloud or a foam,” Yang says. “But both of them are essentially different ways of modeling the same underlying graph, which is an elegant way to represent living tissues. By combining these as one graph, we can highlight more structural information, like how cells are connected to each other as they rearrange over time.”

At the heart of the new model is a “dual-graph” structure that represents a developing embryo as both moving points and bubbles. Through this dual representation, the researchers hoped to capture more detailed geometric properties of individual cells, such as the location of a cell’s nucleus, whether a cell is touching a neighboring cell, and whether it is folding or dividing at a given moment in time.

As a proof of principle, the team trained the new model to “learn” how individual cells change over time during fruit fly gastrulation.

“The overall shape of the fruit fly at this stage is roughly an ellipsoid, but there are gigantic dynamics going on at the surface during gastrulation,” Guo says. “It goes from entirely smooth to forming a number of folds at different angles. And we want to predict all of those dynamics, moment to moment, and cell by cell.”

Where and when

For their new study, the researchers applied the new model to high-quality videos of fruit fly gastrulation taken by their collaborators at the University of Michigan. The videos are one-hour recordings of developing fruit flies, taken at single-cell resolution. What’s more, the videos contain labels of individual cells’ edges and nuclei — data that are incredibly detailed and difficult to come by.

“These videos are of extremely high quality,” Yang says. “This data is very rare, where you get submicron resolution of the whole 3D volume at a pretty fast frame rate.”

The team trained the new model with data from three of four fruit fly embryo videos, such that the model might “learn” how individual cells interact and change as an embryo develops. They then tested the model on an entirely new fruit fly video, and found that it was able to predict with high accuracy how most of the embryo’s 5,000 cells changed from minute to minute.

Specifically, the model could predict properties of individual cells, such as whether they will fold, divide, or continue sharing an edge with a neighboring cell, with about 90 percent accuracy.

“We end up predicting not only whether these things will happen, but also when,” Guo says. “For instance, will this cell detach from this cell seven minutes from now, or eight? We can tell when that will happen.”

The team believes that, in principle, the new model, and the dual-graph approach, should be able to predict the cell-by-cell development of other multiceullar systems, such as more complex species, and even some human tissues and organs. The limiting factor is the availability of high-quality video data.

“From the model perspective, I think it’s ready,” Guo says. “The real bottleneck is the data. If we have good quality data of specific tissues, the model could be directly applied to predict the development of many more structures.”

This work is supported, in part, by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Throughout campus and across the river in Boston and Brookline, MIT hosts a vibrant network of 43 fraternities and sororities, with more than 35 percent of undergraduate students belonging to one of these value-based communities. Each fraternity and sorority is a unique community that not only fosters leadership and builds lifelong friendships, but also takes its role in giving back seriously.

Keeping up a 143-year-long tradition of philanthropy, several fraternities and sororities raised funds for a variety of local charities this fall, including the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Boston Area Rape Crisis Center, and Dignity Matters of Boston.

With donations still coming in, Liz Jason, associate dean of Fraternities, Sororities and Independent Living Groups (FSILG) at MIT, says, “Philanthropy is a defining tradition within our FSILG community; it’s where values become action. When chapters give back, they strengthen their bonds, uplift others, and demonstrate what it truly means to be part of MIT: using talent, passion, and collective effort to make a real difference.”

To raise money, the fraternities and sororities hosted a variety of fun, clever, and even unique events and challenges over the course of the fall semester.

Sorority Alpha Chi Omega held an event called Walk a Mile in Her Shoes, where participants donned heels for a relay race-style event to raise awareness of gender stereotypes, domestic violence, and sexual assault. They also held a bake sale at the event, with funds going to the Boston Area Rape Crisis Center.

The Interfraternity Council (IFC) hosted a Greek Carnival on Kresge Oval in October to benefit the Boston Area Rape Crisis Center and to raise awareness about sexual violence. They held a variety of games and activities, including a dunk tank, a bake sale, a tug-of-war competition, and other field-day games.

“In my own chapter, Delta Tau Delta, I’ve seen an interest in increasing our philanthropic efforts, and as a member of the IFC Executive Board, I realized we could take the initiative to reduce barriers to entry for all chapters through a single large fundraising event,” says senior Luc Gaitskell.

In mid-November, the MIT Panhellenic Association created an event in which members of the community donated clothing, and then Panhel used the clothing to set up a one-time thrift shop where community members could come buy second-hand clothes at discounted prices. All the money raised was donated to Dignity Matters.

“Service has always been at the heart of what MIT Panhel does,” says senior Sabrina Chen. “We chose to partner with Dignity Matters because their mission of helping individuals stay healthy and regain self-confidence resonates with our commitment to supporting women and advancing equity. Our thrift shop was a perfect way to raise money for the organization while encouraging affordable, sustainable fashion.”

Division of Student Life vice chancellor Suzy Nelson explains, “Our students are committed to a range of causes; their dedication reflects not only their generosity, but also the spirit of engaging the MIT community in giving back through philanthropy.”

Students interested in joining a fraternity, sorority, or an independent living group can find more information on the Division of Student Life website.

In February, President Sally Kornbluth announced the appointment of Professor Angela Koehler as faculty director of the MIT Health and Life Sciences Collaborative (MIT HEALS), with professors Iain Cheeseman and Katharina Ribbeck as associate directors. Since then, the leadership team has moved quickly to shape HEALS into an ambitious, community-wide platform for catalyzing research, translation, and education at MIT and beyond — at a moment when advances in computation, biology, and engineering are redefining what’s possible in health and the life sciences.

Rooted in MIT’s long-standing strengths in foundational discovery, convergence, and translational science, HEALS is designed to foster connections across disciplines — linking life scientists and engineers with clinicians, computational scientists, humanists, operations researchers, and designers. The initiative builds on a simple premise: that solving today’s most pressing challenges in health and life sciences requires bold thinking, deep collaboration, and sustained investment in people.

“HEALS is an opportunity to rethink how we support talent, unlock scientific ideas, and translate them into impact,” says Koehler, the Charles W. and Jennifer C. Johnson Professor in the Department of Biological Engineering and associate director of the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research. “We’re building on MIT’s best traditions — convergence, experimentation, and entrepreneurship — while opening new channels for interdisciplinary research and community building.”

Koehler says her own path has been shaped by that same belief in convergence. Early collaborations between chemists, engineers, and clinicians convinced her that bringing diverse people together — what she calls “induced proximity” — can spark discoveries that wouldn’t emerge in isolation.

A culture of connection

Since stepping into their roles, the HEALS leadership team has focused on building a collaborative ecosystem that enables researchers to take on bold, interdisciplinary challenges in health and life sciences. Rather than creating a new center or department, their approach emphasizes connecting the MIT community across existing boundaries — disciplinary, institutional, and cultural.

“We want to fund science that wouldn’t otherwise happen — projects that bridge gaps, open new doors, and bring researchers together in ways that are genuinely constructive and collaborative,” says Iain Cheeseman, the Herman and Margaret Sokol Professor of Biology, core member of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, and associate head of the Department of Biology.

That vision is already taking shape through initiatives like the MIT HEALS seed grants, which support bold new collaborations between MIT principal investigators; the MIT–Mass General Brigham Seed Program, which supports joint research between investigators at MIT and clinicians at MGB; and the Biswas Postdoctoral Fellowship Program, designed to bring top early-career researchers to MIT to pursue cross-cutting work in areas such as computational biology, biomedical engineering, and therapeutic discovery.

The leadership team sees these programs not as endpoints, but as starting points for a broader shift in how MIT supports health and life sciences research.

For Cheeseman, whose lab is working to build on their fundamental discoveries on how human cells function to impact cancer treatment and rare human disease, HEALS represents a way to connect deep biological discovery with the translational insights emerging from MIT’s engineering and clinical communities. He puts it simply: “to me, this is deeply personal, recognizing the limitations that existed for my own work and hoping to unlock these possibilities for researchers across MIT.”

Training the next generation

Ribbeck, a biologist focused on mucus and microbial ecosystems, sees HEALS as a way to train scientists who are as comfortable discussing patient needs as they are conducting experiments at the bench. She emphasizes that preparing the next generation of researchers means equipping them with fluency in areas like clinical language, regulatory processes, and translational pathways — skills many current investigators lack. “Many PIs, although they do clinical research, may not have dedicated support for taking their findings to the next level — how to design a clinical trial, or what regulatory questions need to be addressed — reflecting a broader structural gap in translational training” she says.

A central focus for the HEALS leadership team is building new models for training researchers to move fluidly between disciplines, institutions, and methods of translation. Ribbeck and Koehler stress the importance of giving students and postdocs hands-on opportunities that connect research with real-world experience. That means expanding programs like the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP), the Advanced UROP (SuperUROP), and the MIT New Engineering Education Transformation, and creating new ways for trainees to engage with industry, clinical partners, and entrepreneurship. They are learning at the intersection of engineering, biology, and medicine — and increasingly across disciplines that span economics, design, the social sciences, and the humanities, where students are already creating collaborations that do not yet have formal pathways. 

Koehler, drawing from her leadership at the Deshpande Center for Technological Innovation and the Koch Institute, notes that “if we invest in the people, the solutions to problems will naturally arise.” She envisions HEALS as a platform for induced proximity — not just of disciplines, but of people at different career stages, working together in environments that support both risk-taking and mentorship.

“For me, HEALS builds on what I’ve seen work at MIT — bringing people with different skill sets together to tackle challenges in life sciences and medicine,” she says. “It’s about putting community first and empowering the next generation to lead across disciplines.”

A platform for impact

Looking ahead, the HEALS leadership team envisions the collaborative as a durable platform for advancing health and life sciences at MIT. That includes launching flagship events, supporting high-risk, high-reward ideas, and developing partnerships across the biomedical ecosystem in Boston and beyond. ​​As they see it, MIT is uniquely positioned for this moment: More than three-quarters of the Institute’s faculty work in areas that touch health and life sciences, giving HEALS a rare opportunity to bring that breadth together in new configurations and amplify impact across disciplines.

From the earliest conversations, the leaders have heard a clear message from faculty across MIT — a strong appetite for deeper connection, for working across boundaries, and for tackling urgent societal challenges together. That shared sense of momentum is what gave rise to HEALS, and it now drives the team’s focus on building the structures that can support a community that wants to collaborate at scale.

“Faculty across MIT are already reaching out — looking to connect with clinics, collaborate on new challenges, and co-create solutions,” says Koehler. “That hunger for connection is why HEALS was created. Now we have to build the structures that support it.”

Cheeseman adds that this collaborative model is what makes MIT uniquely positioned to lead. “When you bring together people from different fields who are motivated by impact,” he says, “you create the conditions for discoveries that none of us could achieve alone.”

As language models (LMs) improve at tasks like image generation, trivia questions, and simple math, you might think that human-like reasoning is around the corner. In reality, they still trail us by a wide margin on complex tasks. Try playing Sudoku with one, for instance, where you fill in numbers one through nine in such a way that each appears only once across the columns, rows, and sections of a nine-by-nine grid. Your AI opponent will either fail to fill in boxes on its own or do so inefficiently, although it can verify if you’ve filled yours out correctly.

Whether an LM is trying to solve advanced puzzles, design molecules, or write math proofs, the system struggles to answer open-ended requests that have strict rules to follow. The model is better at telling users how to approach these challenges than attempting them itself. Moreover, hands-on problem-solving requires LMs to consider a wide range of options while following constraints. Small LMs can’t do this reliably on their own; large language models (LLMs) sometimes can, particularly if they’re optimized for reasoning tasks, but they take a while to respond, and they use a lot of computing power.

This predicament led researchers from MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) to develop a collaborative approach where an LLM does the planning, then divvies up the legwork of that strategy among smaller ones. Their method helps small LMs provide more accurate responses than leading LLMs like OpenAI’s GPT-4o, and approach the precision of top reasoning systems such as o1, while being more efficient than both. Their framework, called “Distributional Constraints by Inference Programming with Language Models” (or “DisCIPL”), has a large model steer smaller “follower” models toward precise responses when writing things like text blurbs, grocery lists with budgets, and travel itineraries.

The inner workings of DisCIPL are much like contracting a company for a particular job. You provide a “boss” model with a request, and it carefully considers how to go about doing that project. Then, the LLM relays these instructions and guidelines in a clear way to smaller models. It corrects follower LMs’ outputs where needed — for example, replacing one model’s phrasing that doesn’t fit in a poem with a better option from another.

The LLM communicates with its followers using a language they all understand — that is, a programming language for controlling LMs called “LLaMPPL.” Developed by MIT's Probabilistic Computing Project in 2023, this program allows users to encode specific rules that steer a model toward a desired result. For example, LLaMPPL can be used to produce error-free code by incorporating the rules of a particular language within its instructions. Directions like “write eight lines of poetry where each line has exactly eight words” are encoded in LLaMPPL, queuing smaller models to contribute to different parts of the answer.

MIT PhD student Gabriel Grand, who is the lead author on a paper presenting this work, says that DisCIPL allows LMs to guide each other toward the best responses, which improves their overall efficiency. “We’re working toward improving LMs’ inference efficiency, particularly on the many modern applications of these models that involve generating outputs subject to constraints,” adds Grand, who is also a CSAIL researcher. “Language models are consuming more energy as people use them more, which means we need models that can provide accurate answers while using minimal computing power.”

“It's really exciting to see new alternatives to standard language model inference,” says University of California at Berkeley Assistant Professor Alane Suhr, who wasn’t involved in the research. “This work invites new approaches to language modeling and LLMs that significantly reduce inference latency via parallelization, require significantly fewer parameters than current LLMs, and even improve task performance over standard serialized inference. The work also presents opportunities to explore transparency, interpretability, and controllability of model outputs, which is still a huge open problem in the deployment of these technologies.”

An underdog story

You may think that larger-scale LMs are “better” at complex prompts than smaller ones when it comes to accuracy and efficiency. DisCIPL suggests a surprising counterpoint for these tasks: If you can combine the strengths of smaller models instead, you may just see an efficiency bump with similar results.

The researchers note that, in theory, you can plug in dozens of LMs to work together in the DisCIPL framework, regardless of size. In writing and reasoning experiments, they went with GPT-4o as their “planner LM,” which is one of the models that helps ChatGPT generate responses. It brainstormed a plan for several “Llama-3.2-1B” models (smaller systems developed by Meta), in which those LMs filled in each word (or token) of the response.

This collective approach competed against three comparable ones: a follower-only baseline powered by Llama-3.2-1B, GPT-4o working on its own, and the industry-leading o1 reasoning system that helps ChatGPT figure out more complex questions, such as coding requests and math problems.

DisCIPL first presented an ability to write sentences and paragraphs that follow explicit rules. The models were given very specific prompts — for example, writing a sentence that has exactly 18 words, where the fourth word must be “Glasgow,” the eighth should be “in”, and the 11th must be “and.” The system was remarkably adept at handling this request, crafting coherent outputs while achieving accuracy and coherence similar to o1.

Faster, cheaper, better

This experiment also revealed that key components of DisCIPL were much cheaper than state-of-the-art systems. For instance, whereas existing reasoning models like OpenAI’s o1 perform reasoning in text, DisCIPL “reasons” by writing Python code, which is more compact. In practice, the researchers found that DisCIPL led to 40.1 percent shorter reasoning and 80.2 percent cost savings over o1.

DisCIPL’s efficiency gains stem partly from using small Llama models as followers, which are 1,000 to 10,000 times cheaper per token than comparable reasoning models. This means that DisCIPL is more “scalable” — the researchers were able to run dozens of Llama models in parallel for a fraction of the cost.

Those weren’t the only surprising findings, according to CSAIL researchers. Their system also performed well against o1 on real-world tasks, such as making ingredient lists, planning out a travel itinerary, and writing grant proposals with word limits. Meanwhile, GPT-4o struggled with these requests, and with writing tests, it often couldn’t place keywords in the correct parts of sentences. The follower-only baseline essentially finished in last place across the board, as it had difficulties with following instructions.

“Over the last several years, we’ve seen some impressive results from approaches that use language models to ‘auto-formalize’ problems in math and robotics by representing them with code,” says senior author Jacob Andreas, who is an MIT electrical engineering and computer science associate professor and CSAIL principal investigator. “What I find most exciting about this paper is the fact that we can now use LMs to auto-formalize text generation itself, enabling the same kinds of efficiency gains and guarantees that we’ve seen in these other domains.” 

In the future, the researchers plan on expanding this framework into a more fully-recursive approach, where you can use the same model as both the leader and followers. Grand adds that DisCIPL could be extended to mathematical reasoning tasks, where answers are harder to verify. They also intend to test the system on its ability to meet users’ fuzzy preferences, as opposed to following hard constraints, which can’t be outlined in code so explicitly. Thinking even bigger, the team hopes to use the largest possible models available, although they note that such experiments are computationally expensive.

Grand and Andreas wrote the paper alongside CSAIL principal investigator and MIT Professor Joshua Tenenbaum, as well as MIT Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Principal Research Scientist Vikash Mansinghka and Yale University Assistant Professor Alex Lew SM ’20 PhD ’25. CSAIL researchers presented the work at the Conference on Language Modeling in October and IVADO’s “Deploying Autonomous Agents: Lessons, Risks and Real-World Impact” workshop in November.

Their work was supported, in part, by the MIT Quest for Intelligence, Siegel Family Foundation, the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab, a Sloan Research Fellowship, Intel, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Office of Naval Research, and the National Science Foundation.

Artificial intelligence can enhance decision-making and enable action with reduced risk and greater precision, making it a critical tool for national security. A new program offered jointly by the MIT departments of Mechanical Engineering (Course 2, MechE) and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Course 6, EECS) will provide breadth and depth in technical studies for naval officers, as well as a path for non-naval officers studying at MIT, to grow in their understanding of applied AI for naval and military applications.

“The potential for artificial intelligence is just starting to be fully realized. It’s a tool that dramatically improves speed, efficiency, and decision-making with countless applications,” says Commander Christopher MacLean, MIT associate professor of the practice in mechanical engineering, naval construction, and engineering. “AI is a force multiplier that can be used for data processing, decision support, unmanned and autonomous systems, cyber defense, logistics and supply chains, energy management, and many other fields.”

The program, called “2N6: Applied Artificial Intelligence Program for Naval Officers,” comprises a two-year master of science degree in mechanical engineering with an accompanying AI certificate awarded by the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing.

“The officers entering this program will learn from the world’s experts, and conduct cutting-edge relevant research, and will exit the program best prepared for their roles as leaders across the U.S. naval enterprise,” says MacLean.

The 2N6 curriculum is application focused, and the content is built to satisfy the U.S. Navy’s sub-specialty code for Applied Artificial Intelligence. Students will learn core AI concepts, as well as applications to special topics, such as decision-making for computational exercises; AI for manufacturing and design, with special emphasis on navy applications; and AI for marine autonomy of surface and underwater vehicles.

“The expanding influence of artificial intelligence is redefining our approach to problem-solving. AI holds the potential to address some of the most pressing issues in nearly every field,” says Dan Huttenlocher, dean of the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing and Henry Ellis Warren Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. “I’m honored that the college can contribute to and support such a vital program that will equip our nation’s naval officers with the technical expertise they need for mission-relevant challenges.”

MIT has been a leading center of ship research and design for over a century, with work at the Institute today representing significant advancements in fluid mechanics and hydrodynamics, acoustics, offshore mechanics, marine robotics and sensors, and ocean sensing and forecasting. The 2N program will celebrate its 125th year at MIT in 2026.

“In MechE, we are embracing the use of AI to explore new frontiers in research and education, with deep grounding in the fundamentals, design, and scaling of physical systems,” says John Hart, the Class of 1922 Professor and head of MechE. “With the 2N6 program, we’re proud to be at the helm of such an important charge in training the next generation of leaders for the Navy.”

“Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence are reshaping society and advancing human decision-making and creativity,” says Asu Ozdaglar, deputy dean of the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, head of EECS, and MathWorks Professor. “We are delighted to partner with the Department of Mechanical Engineering in launching this important collaboration with the U.S. Navy. The program will explore not only the forefront of AI advances, but also its effective application in Navy operations.”

2N6 was created following a visit to campus from Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, with MIT Provost Anantha Chandrakasan, who was then dean of engineering and chief innovation and strategy officer.

“[Admiral Paparo] was given an overview of some of the cutting-edge work and research that MIT has done and is doing in the field of AI, [and was introduced to the 2N program],” says MacLean. “The admiral made the connection, envisioning an applied AI program similar to 2N.”

2N6 will run as a pilot program for at least two years. The program’s first cohort will comprise only U.S. Navy officers, with plans to expand more broadly.

“We are thrilled to build on the long-standing relationship between MIT and the U.S. Navy with this new program,” says Themis Sapsis, William I. Koch Professor in mechanical engineering and the director of the Center for Ocean Engineering at MIT. “It is specifically designed to train naval officers on the fundamentals and applications of AI, but also involve them in research that has direct impact to the Navy. We believe that 2N6 can model a new paradigm for advanced AI education focused more broadly on supporting national security.”