The Department of Transportation secretary said replacing the MTA as the project's lead will save $120 million.

The bank’s messaging on climate represents a delicate balancing act between the institution and the U.S., its largest shareholder.

The Solar Energy Industries Association is intensifying its defense of climate law incentives as Republicans hone in on repeals.

The hesitancy comes as the White House has sought to crack down on state climate laws. Local trucking groups have raised concerns too.

The commission president’s visit comes as the U.K. and EU explore closer ties.

China and most other nations missed a February deadline to file the nationally determined contributions, which will set climate-related goals through 2035.

The Green Impact Exchange expects to begin trading early next year.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 21 April 2025; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02310-4

Urban heat islands are known to increase heat-related mortality, but a global analysis of more than 3,000 cities reveals that urban heat islands also substantially reduce cold-related mortality — a more than fourfold offset, globally. Although commonly used cooling strategies benefit some tropical cities, they harm others at higher latitudes, and instead a seasonally adaptive approach to heat mitigation is needed.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 21 April 2025; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02303-3

The urban heat island (UHI) effect can increase and decrease mortality depending on the season, yet global comparison is still lacking. This study finds that the UHI effect has net positive impact by reducing more cold-related mortality and highlights the necessity of place-based adaptive cooling strategies.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 21 April 2025; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02304-2

Many governments have adopted policies to reduce fossil fuel subsidies, but these policies almost always fail within three years. Policymakers should find new strategies to trim subsidies and promote renewable energy without triggering political backlash.

A live colossal squid was filmed for the first time in the ocean. It’s only a juvenile: a foot long.

As usual, you can also use this squid post to talk about the security stories in the news that I haven’t covered.

Ola Bini was first detained in Quito’s airport six years ago, called a “Russian hacker,” and accused of “alleged participation in the crime of assault on the integrity of computer systems.” It wouldn't take long for Ecuadorean authorities to find out that he was Swedish and an internationally respected free software developer and computer expert. 

Lacking evidence, authorities rapidly changed the criminal offense underpinning the accusation against Bini and struggled to build a case based on a mere image that shows no wrongdoing. Yet, Bini remained arbitrarily detained for 70 days in 2019 and outrageously remains under criminal prosecution.

This week, the Observation Mission monitoring Ola Bini’s case is again calling out the prosecution’s inaccuracies and abuses that weaponize misunderstandings about computer security, undermining both Bini’s rights and digital security more broadly. The Observation Mission is comprised of digital and human rights organizations, including EFF. Specifically, we highlight how Ecuadorean law enforcement authorities have tried to associate the use of Tor, a crucial privacy protection tool, with inherently suspicious activity. 

Following a RightsCon 2025 session about the flaws and risks of such an interpretation, we are releasing this week a technical statement (see below) pointing out why Ecuadorean courts must reaffirm Bini’s innocence and repudiate misconceptions about technology and technical knowledge that only disguise the prosecutor’s lack of evidence supporting the accusations against Bini. 

Let’s not forget that Bini was unanimously acquitted in early 2023. Nonetheless, the Prosecutor’s Office appealed and the majority of the appeals court considered him guilty of attempted unauthorized access of a telecommunications system. The reasoning leading to this conclusion has many problems, including mixing the concepts of private and public IP addresses and disregarding key elements of the acquittal sentence.  

The ruling also refers to the use of Tor. Among other issues, the prosecution argued that Tor is not a tool known by any person except for technical experts since its purpose is to hide your identity on the internet while leaving no trace you're using it. As we stressed at RightsCon, this argument turns the use of a privacy-protective, security-enhancing technology into an indication of suspicious criminal activity, which is a dangerous extrapolation of the “nothing-to-hide argument.” 

The prosecutor’s logic, which the majority appeal ruling endorses, is if you’re keeping your online activities private it’s because you’re most likely doing something wrong, instead of we all have privacy rights, so we are entitled to use technologies that ensure privacy and security by default. 

Backing such an understanding in a court ruling sets an extremely worrying precedent for privacy and security online. The use of Tor must not be up for grabs when a prosecutor lacks actual evidence to sustain a criminal case.

Bini’s defense has appealed the unfounded conviction. We remain vigilant, hoping that the Ecuadorean judicial system will correct the course as per basic tenets of the right to a fair trial, recognizing the weakness of the case rather than surrendering to pressure and prejudice. It's past time for justice to prevail in this case. Six years of a lingering flimsy prosecution coupled with the undue restriction of Bini’s fundamental rights is already far too long.

Read the English translation of the statement below (see here the original one in Spanish):

TECHNICAL STATEMENT
Ola Bini’s innocence must be reaffirmed 

In the context of RightsCon Taipei 2025, the Observation Mission of the Ola Bini case and the Tor Project organized a virtual session to analyze the legal proceedings against the digital security expert in Ecuador and to discuss to what extent and with what implications the use of the Tor digital tool is criminalized1. In that session, which included organizations and speakers from civil society from different countries, we reached the following conclusions and technical consensuses: 

1. The criminal case against Bini was initiated by political motivations and actors and has been marked by dozens of irregularities and illegalities that undermine its legal legitimacy and technical viability. Rather than a criminal case, this is a persecution. 
2. The way the elements of conviction of the case were established sets a dangerous precedent for the protection of digital rights and expert knowledge in the digital realm in Ecuador and the region. 
3. The construction of the case and the elements presented as evidence by the Ecuadorian Attorney General’s Office (EAG) are riddled with serious procedural distortions and/or significant technical errors2. 
4. Furthermore, to substantiate the crime supposedly under investigation, the EAG has not even required a digital forensic examination that demonstrate whether any kind of system (be it computer, telematic, or telecommunications) was accessed without authorization. 
5. The reasoning used by the Appeals Court to justify its guilty verdict lacks sufficient elements to prove that Ola Bini committed the alleged crime. This not only violates the rights of the digital expert but also creates precedents of arbitrariness that are dangerous for the rule of law3. 
6. More specifically, because of the conviction, part of the Ecuadorian judiciary is creating a concerning precedent for the exercise of the rights to online security and privacy, by holding that the mere use of the Tor tool is sufficient indication of the commission of a criminal act. 
7. Furthermore, contrary to the global trend that should prevail, this ruling could even inspire courts to criminalize the use of other digital tools used for the defense of human rights online, such as VPNs, which are particularly useful for key actors—like journalists, human rights defenders, academics, and others—in authoritarian political contexts. 
8. Around the world, millions of people, including state security agencies, use Tor to carry out their activities. In this context, although the use of Tor is not the central focus of analysis in the present case, the current conviction—part of a politically motivated process lacking technical grounding—constitutes a judicial interpretation that could negatively impact the exercise of the aforementioned rights. 

For these reasons, and six years after the beginning of Ola Bini’s criminal case, the undersigned civil society organizations call on the relevant Ecuadorian judicial authorities to reaffirm Bini’s presumption of innocence at the appropriate procedural stage, as was the first instance ruling demonstrated.

The Observation Mission will continue monitoring the development of the case until its conclusion, to ensure compliance with due process guarantees and to raise awareness of the case’s implications for the protection of digital rights.

1. RightsCon is the leading global summit on human rights in the digital age, organized by Access Now. ↩

2. See https://www.accessnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Informe-final-Caso-Ola-Bini.pdf ↩

3. The Tribunal is composed of Maritza Romero, Fabián Fabara and Narcisa Pacheco. The majority decision is from Fabara and Pacheco. ↩

In 2000, Patrick J. McGovern ’59 and Lore Harp McGovern made an extraordinary gift to establish the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, driven by their deep curiosity about the human mind and their belief in the power of science to change lives. Their $350 million pledge began with a simple yet audacious vision: to understand the human brain in all its complexity, and to leverage that understanding for the betterment of humanity.
 
Twenty-five years later, the McGovern Institute stands as a testament to the power of interdisciplinary collaboration, continuing to shape our understanding of the brain and improve the quality of life for people worldwide.

In the beginning

“This is, by any measure, a truly historic moment for MIT,” said MIT’s 15th president, Charles M. Vest, during his opening remarks at an event in 2000 to celebrate the McGovern gift agreement. “The creation of the McGovern Institute will launch one of the most profound and important scientific ventures of this century in what surely will be a cornerstone of MIT scientific contributions from the decades ahead.”
 
Vest tapped Phillip A. Sharp, MIT Institute professor emeritus of biology and Nobel laureate, to lead the institute, and appointed six MIT professors — Emilio Bizzi, Martha Constantine-Paton, Ann Graybiel PhD ’71, H. Robert Horvitz ’68, Nancy Kanwisher ’80, PhD ’86, and Tomaso Poggio — to represent its founding faculty.  Construction began in 2003 on Building 46, a 376,000 square foot research complex at the northeastern edge of campus. MIT’s new “gateway from the north” would eventually house the McGovern Institute, the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, and MIT’s Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.

Robert Desimone, the Doris and Don Berkey Professor of Neuroscience at MIT, succeeded Sharp as director of the McGovern Institute in 2005, and assembled a distinguished roster of 22 faculty members, including a Nobel laureate, a Breakthrough Prize winner, two National Medal of Science/Technology awardees, and 15 members of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
 
A quarter century of innovation

On April 11, 2025, the McGovern Institute celebrated its 25th anniversary with a half-day symposium featuring presentations by MIT Institute Professor Robert Langer, alumni speakers from various McGovern labs, and Desimone, who is in his 20th year as director of the institute.

Desimone highlighted the institute’s recent discoveries, including the development of the CRISPR genome-editing system, which has culminated in the world’s first CRISPR gene therapy approved for humans — a remarkable achievement that is ushering in a new era of transformative medicine. In other milestones, McGovern researchers developed the first prosthetic limb fully controlled by the body’s nervous system; a flexible probe that taps into gut-brain communication; an expansion microscopy technique that paves the way for biology labs around the world to perform nanoscale imaging; and advanced computational models that demonstrate how we see, hear, use language, and even think about what others are thinking. Equally transformative has been the McGovern Institute’s work in neuroimaging, uncovering the architecture of human thought and establishing markers that signal the early emergence of mental illness, before symptoms even appear.

Synergy and open science
 
“I am often asked what makes us different from other neuroscience institutes and programs around the world,” says Desimone. “My answer is simple. At the McGovern Institute, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.”
 
Many discoveries at the McGovern Institute have depended on collaborations across multiple labs, ranging from biological engineering to human brain imaging and artificial intelligence. In modern brain research, significant advances often require the joint expertise of people working in neurophysiology, behavior, computational analysis, neuroanatomy, and molecular biology. More than a dozen different MIT departments are represented by McGovern faculty and graduate students, and this synergy has led to insights and innovations that are far greater than what any single discipline could achieve alone.
 
Also baked into the McGovern ethos is a spirit of open science, where newly developed technologies are shared with colleagues around the world. Through hospital partnerships for example, McGovern researchers are testing their tools and therapeutic interventions in clinical settings, accelerating their discoveries into real-world solutions.

The McGovern legacy  

Hundreds of scientific papers have emerged from McGovern labs over the past 25 years, but most faculty would argue that it’s the people — the young researchers — that truly define the McGovern Institute. Award-winning faculty often attract the brightest young minds, but many McGovern faculty also serve as mentors, creating a diverse and vibrant scientific community that is setting the global standard for brain research and its applications. Kanwisher, for example, has guided more than 70 doctoral students and postdocs who have gone on to become leading scientists around the world. Three of her former students, Evelina Fedorenko PhD ’07, Josh McDermott PhD ’06, and Rebecca Saxe PhD ’03, the John W. Jarve (1978) Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, are now her colleagues at the McGovern Institute. Other McGovern alumni shared stories of mentorship, science, and real-world impact at the 25th anniversary symposium.

Looking to the future, the McGovern community is more committed than ever to unraveling the mysteries of the brain and making a meaningful difference in lives of individuals at a global scale.
 
“By promoting team science, open communication, and cross-discipline partnerships,” says institute co-founder Lore Harp McGovern, “our culture demonstrates how individual expertise can be amplified through collective effort. I am honored to be the co-founder of this incredible institution — onward to the next 25 years!”

The firefighter health program was researching firefighters’ chemical exposures in electric vehicle fires — a first step to developing protective equipment.

Liberty Energy's latest quarterly profit of $165 million represented its worst quarter since the start of 2022.

A new report says 20 governments are creating or considering establishing carbon markets, including India, Turkey and Vietnam.

More than a third of the 100 most prestigious U.S. firms received an F on a scorecard issued by the Law Students for Climate Accountability.

While President Donald Trump and Elon Musk are attacking the $100 billion plan, Democrats hold the real power over its fate — and they're not fully on board.

Finding ways to cut emissions often requires analyzing vast datasets and identifying new patterns — something computers do better and faster than humans.

Extreme weather and natural disasters make it harder for blood donors to reach donation locations and slow the transport of perishable blood products.